This is the Q&A part.
David Axelrod makes a couple of great points:
1) If the Senate version of HC Reform is so bad, the insurance lobby wouldn't still be fighting so hard to kill it. There are some heavy regulatory reform items that should do good things for insurance consumers. For me, that's a pretty big deal.
2) Overall, getting something passed is better that getting nothing passed. I still have big doubts about the mandate, and they will stay with me until I hear something that balances it out.
The kicker is that this remains a must win for Obama.
No comments:
Post a Comment