Aug 23, 2026

Calling All Recalls

Breaking the government is the point. And punishing people is meant to rally them to the cause.

"See? The government's all fucked up. And there's no fixing it, but you can stop your suffering by supporting us as we replace it with a corporate plutocracy."

OK, so it's not quite as bad as all that - not yet anyway - but I think it's healthy to maintain my very low confidence in this MAGA gang. IMO, it's more than justified, and it's likely to get worse before we have a real chance to make it better.


Lettuce. Blueberries. Eggs. JalapeƱos. Why are there so many food-safety scares this summer?

Bill Marler's business is booming — and that's not great for the rest of us.

Marler is a food safety lawyer, defending people who've been sickened by foodborne illness. He has been doing this for 33 years, with such high-profile wins that he's become a towering figure in the food safety world.

This year, he's so slammed with foodborne-illness cases that, for the first time in years, he's expanding his team — hiring another lawyer and a couple of paralegals. "We just have too much shit to do," Marler said.

This summer alone, Americans have been warned about a massive Cyclospora outbreak linked to iceberg lettuce — 10,930 confirmed illnesses, 454 hospitalizations, and two deaths — plus Salmonella in jalapeƱos and eggs and E. coli in frozen blueberries. Then there are the recalls: bread that may contain metal fragments, fruit bars that may contain glass, and foods pulled for possible bacterial contamination or undeclared allergens.

By August, the FDA's 2026 public health advisories had covered what felt like everything, from cheese to infant formula.

"As a consumer, you're looking at this like, well, what the hell's safe to eat?" Marler said.

America is having a headline-grabbing food-safety summer. Some of that is perception: We're better at finding outbreaks, and recall counts can be misleading.


But long-standing vulnerabilities in our food system — compounded by cuts to the public health infrastructure designed to catch problems — are also at play. Whether it represents something more significant is harder to say.

"It's real, and it looks bad," Marler said.

Recall counts can be misleading

This summer looks more exceptional than it actually is, said Craig Hedberg, a professor and foodborne-disease epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota.

"Certainly the magnitude of the cyclospora outbreak is unprecedented, but in terms of all of the things that are going on with food, it's not all that unusual," Hedberg said.

Summer is typically a busy season for foodborne illness, he said, and outbreaks involving foods like sprouts, berries, and produce recur year after year. What's truly extraordinary in 2026 is cyclospora — "an order of magnitude bigger than anything we've seen in previous years."

Recall counts can also exaggerate the number of distinct problems. Jennifer McEntire, founder of Food Safety Strategy, a consulting firm that works with industry groups, pointed out that when a single contaminated ingredient is used in many foods, each finished product may trigger its own recall.

"This makes the recall numbers look high, even though the number of 'root causes' may be much lower," McEntire said.

Take California Dairies, which recalled certain bulk batches of powdered milk and buttermilk in April due to potential Salmonella contamination. These products had been sold to wholesale distributors and manufacturers, triggering downstream recalls.

That meant the recall rippled across the sector, with over a dozen products pulled from shelves — from potato chips to ranch seasoning.

We're finding issues we couldn't find before

There's another reason today's food-safety problems may be more visible: We're better at finding them.

"We clearly have better tools and are using them more effectively to identify outbreaks," Hedberg said.

In the last five to 10 years, public health laboratories have increasingly used whole-genome sequencing to link seemingly isolated Salmonella or E. coli cases by their genetic fingerprints.

That means some of what appears to be an increase in foodborne illness is actually better surveillance. "We're finding ones that may have been missed previously," said Melanie Firestone, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota, who studies foodborne-disease surveillance.

Those tools, however, aren't as readily available for Cyclospora, in part because the parasite can't be grown in a lab; investigators rely more heavily on finding common exposures among sick people.

Our food system has changed — and one mistake can go a very long way

The food system itself has also transformed. Americans can now buy fresh produce year-round, including fruits and vegetables.

"Foods don't go out of season. We just go to the season where they're being produced, and we bring them in," Hedberg said.

Still, a food system optimized for year-round availability, convenience, long supply chains, and massive distribution networks can also amplify failures.

Marler points to the massive 2006 E. coli outbreak linked to bagged spinach, a crisis so consequential that he said the leafy-greens industry came to refer to it as its "9/11."

Investigators traced the spinach to a single 20-acre farm that had a wild-pig invasion. Not every crop was infected, but harvesting and processing allowed it to spread. The bags were then shipped around the country, turning what Marler argued might once have been scattered illnesses into a national outbreak.

Ultimately, when something does go wrong, the modern food system can make it go spectacularly wrong.

"The reality is that with a lot of our fresh produce, once contamination occurs, we have limited ability to decontaminate the produce items," Hedberg said.

Parts of our safety net weakened

One explanation for the increased number of headlines about food safety has loomed particularly large this summer: the Trump administration's DOGE cuts.

In 2025, the administration cut thousands of jobs across federal health agencies and billions of dollars in grants to state and local health departments.

Those cuts landed on a public-health system that was already stretched. "Our public health systems have been chronically underfunded for a long time, and we're seeing that worsen," Firestone said.

In a statement, the FDA said that "frontline FDA investigators are critical to the FDA's mission and were exempt from past workforce reductions."

The agency said that while there are more foodborne illness clusters in 2026 than in previous years, it is "constantly working to improve laboratory detection of foodborne illness," such as Cyclospora. "Still, Cyclospora remains a challenging agent and epidemiology, and traceback are key elements of an outbreak investigation."

Food safety cuts predate the Trump administration. In 2012, under the Obama administration, the USDA's Microbiological Data Program ended after its funding was eliminated. The program had sampled and tested selected fruits and vegetables for foodborne pathogens, reporting its findings to federal and state public health agencies — proactive surveillance, rather than waiting for reports of infections to crop up.

Some food-safety hazards, Hedberg said, are well understood and "just require constant attention on the part of producers to be able to prevent."

So, should I be scared of my groceries?

Hedberg doesn't think this summer should change the way Americans eat. "Most of the food moving through the system is free of contamination," he said.

Fresh produce remains an important part of a healthy diet, and he cautioned against allowing a single enormous outbreak to distort our sense of risk.

That doesn't mean accepting outbreaks as inevitable.

Thirty years ago, hamburgers kept Marler incredibly busy: more than 90% of his E. coli cases involved them. Today, he said, it's practically zero. "That's because of government intervention and industry stepping up."

After the deadly 1993 Jack in the Box outbreak, regulators and the meat industry introduced new rules, testing, and other safeguards that made hamburger substantially safer.

So, is this summer unusually riskier? The Cyclospora outbreak is. Beyond that, many of the problems are familiar ones. And the hamburger example shows that which foods pose the biggest risks can change substantially over time.

The Subconscious Shows Up

Guys like BKjr can't help but self-sabotage eventually. They have to blow themselves up, and they go way out of their way to take a lot of us with them - their egos demand it.




Dave Columbo


Trump's dumbassery is without limit.

A TweeXt


Aug 22, 2026

Maggie


The probability is low, bit it ain't zero - not with this fuckin' crew.

More Belle

It's really so simple, even Trump could understand it. But he doesn't - because he's such a fuckin' dumbass.


Aaron Parnas

Our Canuckistani cousins ain't havin' it.

Here I am in MAGA-occupied America, cheering for an "opponent" to kick our ass.

And maybe I'm being a little over-dramatic, but it feels pretty weird - like maybe this is how the French or the Dutch felt in 1944, waiting for liberation.

Got get 'em, Cousins


Belle

Trump's #1 preferred go-to response to everything is force - one kind or another, he's going to use or threaten force to get his way.

Kinda what a malignant narcissistic abusive rapist does, isn't it?


The Bubble

"Earnings are opinion. Cash flow is fact."


Opinion: The bond market is going to burst the stock-market bubble

Rising yields threaten everything, especially overextended equities


When it comes to stock-market downturns, listen to the Bible. Even if one is coming, “of that day and that hour knoweth no man,” not even “the angels which are in heaven.”

But one is surely coming, and the unraveling of the long-term bond market is raising the chances that one is imminent.

It is already absurdly obvious that we are in a massive stock-market bubble. Former Federal Reserve governor Bill Dudley just pointed out many of the signs, which will likely come as no surprise to regular readers of MarketWatch but which are worth repeating.


While Dudley listed a number of different issues, they boil down to three big ones. First, stock-market valuations are already crazy by any number of measures. Second, the entire artificial-intelligence financial boom is now in the kind of classic Ponzi-style loop that always happens in financial manias, and which has always been followed by a downturn or worse. And third, the rise in long-term interest rates in the U.S. and around the world are exactly the kind of thing that could burst the bubble.

The interest-rate argument is most timely. It looks increasingly like the U.S. Treasury, the global lender of last resort, is losing control of long-term rates. The alleged Treasury “buyback” program that sparked a brief rally was far less than it seemed; it involved trivial sums of money and no new money.

And the bond rally is already over: By early Thursday, the yield or interest rate on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note was already back to where it was before the announcement.

The underlying cause is that both the U.S. and other major developed countries, including Japan and in Europe, have been piling on debt like crazy for decades and lenders, at long last, are starting to ask some serious questions about how sustainable it all is. Epic levels of debt added during the COVID lockdowns, following hefty additions during the global financial crisis, have changed the financial picture.

The word “credit” comes from Latin, and means “he or she believes.” People extend credit because they believe they will get their money back plus interest. Once they start to question that belief, things can spiral very quickly. This happened to the Middle Eastern emirate of Dubai in late 2009, and the so-called PIIGS — Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain — in the years that followed.


Every single financial bubble has burst when some people have started to ask whether they will really get all their money back. In the aftermath, the motto among high-net-worth advisers is that return “of” capital is more important than return “on” capital. Then, as markets boom in the next bubble, the lesson is forgotten.

There are astonishingly few people around on Wall Street who remember the bubble of the mid-2000s, which was followed by the cataclysmic global financial crisis of 2007-09. There are even fewer who remember the great stock-market bubble of the late 1990s, followed by the crash of 2000-03. Alarmingly, there are also astonishingly few people who seem to understand math, or how all these things are connected.

The interest rate on U.S. Treasury bonds, especially on the 10-year note, is the bedrock upon which the entire financial system is based. Back when I was still soaking wet behind the ears and being trained by business-school professors in the arcane world of “corporate finance” and “valuation,” everything started with the “risk-free rate,” meaning the rate of interest an investor could earn on supposedly risk-free investments — meaning U.S. Treasury bonds.

All “risky” assets, meaning all stocks and corporate bonds, are priced in relation to this so-called risk-free rate, using a variety of calculations. If the market starts to worry about U.S. debt levels and pushes up the rate of interest on Treasury bonds to compensate, this in turn pushes up the rates of return demanded by everything else.

And that’s even before you factor in any rise in actual risk aversion caused by a financial crisis.

So if the Treasury is losing control of the Treasury bond market, that isn’t just a matter for bondholders — it’s a matter for everyone. From their peaks in 2007, the various stock markets of the PIIGS each fell between 65% and 85%, when measured in U.S. dollars, before hitting rock bottom around 2012.

So what is happening in the bond market right now is deeply ominous.


Meanwhile, Dudley highlighted the circular financing loop involved in AI. Right now, AI investment is driving the economy and the stock market.

In other words, rising equity prices get reported as corporate earnings, which are then used as an excuse to … raise equity prices still further.

The phrase for this is Ponzi finance. It’s absurd double counting.


Matt Miskin, co-chief investment strategist at Manulife John Hancock Investments, says that the second quarter amply highlights the old adage that “earnings are a matter of opinion, while cash flow is a matter of fact.” In cash-flow terms, he notes, many of the biggest tech companies are now cash flow negative as they spend gigantic sums of money on new AI data centers. They have been forced to issue bonds and even new stock to raise the sums needed.

And the assumptions needed to suggest these investments will earn a good return on capital are somewhere between challenging and preposterous, depending on whom you ask, how well they know you and how much their job depends on keeping the whole thing going.

Sadly, those who warn about stock-market manias, bubbles and Ponzi finance always look wrong until they look right. Actually, they look increasingly wrong until they look right. The late 1990s was littered with the careers of people who had called the stock-market bubble, but too early. Ditto the mid-2000s with the housing boom.

Nobody knows the day or the hour. But that doesn’t mean it won’t come.

A Bit Of Irony


Makes me wonder if Trump's going to send the FBI after that guy for threatening the president.

Of course, he never mentions who that "local pedophile" might be, but the reaction is pretty consistent - Trump's whole gang got knots in their Underoos when Ossoff mentioned "traveling around with Natalie", without making any reference to anything untoward.

It seems, collectively, MAGA has a very dirty mind. And maybe we all do where Trump is concerned, but I think he's given us very good reason for it.


Trump Rally Interrupted by Man Wearing Shirt Saying, ‘Kill Your Local Pedophile’

President Donald Trump’s speech was interrupted Friday when a man wearing a shirt that read “Kill Your Local Pedophile” was removed from the crowd.

The moment came during a rally in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, in support of Sen. Darline Graham (R-SC), who was appointed to her late brother Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-SC) seat at Trump’s urging and is now in a runoff GOP primary against Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC).

After asking the crowd to “pretend, please, that I’m on the ballot” and vote, the president continued about a potential midterms loss, “I’m going to be impeached. They’re gonna impeach me. They have no idea why.”

He then started to tell a story, detailing, “I saw today a congressman said on one of the shows, ‘We’re gonna impeach President Trump. We’re going to impeach him.’ ‘Oh really? Why?’ the person was asking. A neutral commentator, for a change. I like neutral commentators. ‘Oh, I see. You’re gonna impeach him. Why?’ ‘Uh, well, I don’t know.'”

It’s not clear who Trump was referring to, though Fox News did air a clip of an interview Thursday with Florida State Rep. Angie Nixon (D), who won her state’s Senate Democratic primary on Tuesday. In the clip, she said, “I’m looking forward to going to Washington, D.C. to provide everyday, hardworking people with some relief after we work to, you know, impeach.”

After his story, Trump moved away from the podium to listen to what he seemed to think were jeers from the crowd at this alleged plot to impeach him. The Fox News broadcast then went to a split screen, though, showing someone being escorted by security out of the event. He was wearing a shirt that said: “KILL YOUR LOCAL PEDOPHILE.”

“That’s alright,” Trump said of the man’s t-shirt. “That person’s going home to mom, gonna get scolded, ’cause mom is voting for us.”

Either picking up on his train of thought or just retelling the story altogether, the president went on, “They’re gonna impeach. But did you see it this morning? This congressman. It’s a big story. He’s on. ‘We’re going to impeach President Trump.’ ‘Why are you going to impeach him?’ the commentator — ‘Uh.’ ‘Why are you gonna impeach him? What has he done wrong?’ ‘Um, I don’t know.'”