Mar 14, 2026

Overheard


The most important shift in our lifetimes is the effort to decouple 'subsistence' from 'employment'.

If we don't address this with some kind of Universal Basic Income and Universal Healthcare, then the rise of AI won't lead to a 'golden age of abundance' - it will become a crisis of survival.

Mar 13, 2026

Break Time


I have to go a little dark for a while.

Feeling a bit burned out.

I'll be around - I just have to step away
and do something recreational.

Behave yourselves, but look for good trouble.

$200 Oil








Why oil could be headed to $200 a barrel, according to a former IMF economist
  • Oil prices have surged amid unprecedented supply disruptions from the war in Iran.
  • Former IMF economist Olivier Blanchard said compounding risks suggest oil could hit $200 a barrel.
  • Energy Secretary Chris Wright said this week he saw that scenario as unlikely.
  • Oil prices have climbed as the war in Iran rages on, but a former International Monetary Fund economist said prices could have further to rise.
Olivier Blanchard, an economist and former IMF official, outlined the factors influencing oil's volatile price moves.

"I find it hard not to have as a central scenario where oil prices will remain very high for a long time, higher than the market current prices," Blanchard wrote on Thursday.

The economist explained the two principal reasons behind this thinking: Fully protecting ships in the Strait of Hormuz is virtually impossible, and there's "no reason" for Iran to stop threatening ships in the Strait.

The second point reinforces the idea that the market can't rely on the TACO trade again, since the president can't simply decide on his own how the conflict ultimately ends.

TACO, which stands for Trump always chickens out, describes the idea that the president tends to pivot or back down from policies that upset markets, such as his Greenland threats and tariff talk.

There's no TACO fix for Wall Street as oil prices surge due to the war, Marko Kolanovic, the former quant chief at JPMorgan warned.

"There is no reason, whether or not Trump declares that war is over, to think that Iran will not continue for some time to threaten to destroy the ships that try," Blanchard noted.

Supply dynamics signal oil prices could go to $150-$200

JPMorgan analysts estimate a 16 million barrel per day shortfall from the ongoing shipping disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical bottleneck point for global trade.

There are policy levers to address the oil price spike, like reserves, export controls, and lifting the Jones Act, but securing the flow of ships through the Strait remains the paramount hurdle to lowering oil prices.

The International Energy Agency, which announced it will release 400 million barrels of oil from its reserve, said the ongoing conflict marks "the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market."

Blanchard said the supply deficit, combined with the very low demand elasticity for oil, signals prices should be closer to $150 or $200 per barrel, or even higher, rather than current levels around $100.

Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, meanwhile, said it's "unlikely" that oil prices would hit $200, but didn't definitively rule it out.

The official told CNBC in a separate Thursday morning interview that it's "likely" that the US Navy will be able to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz by the end of the month.

Earlier in the week, Wright posted on X that the US had successfully escorted an oil tanker through the Strait. The comment sent oil prices immediately lower, though they bounced back after he deleted the post and after the White House confirmed the US had not escorted any tankers.

Shifting

In the six months since last August, favorability in the Ohio race for Governor has shifted 20 points to the left.


Poll: Amy Acton leads Vivek Ramaswamy by 10 points in Ohio governor's race

A new poll of likely November 2026 Ohio voters shows Democrat Amy Acton leading Republican Vivek Ramaswamy by 10 percentage points in the race for governor — a striking reversal from just six months ago, when Ramaswamy held a double-digit lead of his own.

The survey, conducted by EMC Research from Feb. 10 to Feb. 22, found Acton leading 53% to 43% among 1,343 likely November 2026 voters, with a margin of error of ±2.7 percentage points. Newsweek was among the first outlets to report on the results.

The result is the latest indicator of a race that has moved sharply in Acton’s direction. In August 2025, an Emerson College poll had Ramaswamy up by 10 points — 49% to Acton’s 39%. By December, that same pollster found the race statistically tied, with Acton at 46% and Ramaswamy at 45%. The new February numbers represent an additional lurch in Acton’s favor, driven in part by what analysts and polling data suggest are several compounding vulnerabilities for the Republican front-runner.

Ramaswamy struggling with his own party

Perhaps the most telling number in the new poll is among Republican voters: Ramaswamy is drawing only 65% support from his own base. Acton, by contrast, has consolidated 82% of Democratic voters. Independent voters are breaking 51%-46% for the Democrat.

That weak Republican number tracks with what political observers have noted throughout the campaign. Despite holding the endorsement of President Donald Trump and the Ohio Republican Party — which made an unusually early endorsement of Ramaswamy last spring — the candidate has faced persistent skepticism within GOP ranks.

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, who is term-limited and cannot run again, worked behind the scenes to block the party’s early endorsement of Ramaswamy, according to reporting by NBC News. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who eventually suspended his own gubernatorial campaign after the party coalesced around Ramaswamy, was previously blunt in his criticism. “Mr. Ramaswamy quit on President Trump and DOGE on day one, he quit on Ohio and moved his company to Texas, and he quit his presidential campaign after a devastating fourth-place finish in Iowa,” Yost said when Ramaswamy entered the race.

The Texas problem

That “moved his company to Texas” line has not gone away. Ramaswamy founded Strive Asset Management in Columbus, but the firm relocated to Dallas in November 2024, before he announced his gubernatorial bid. Ramaswamy has said the move was made by the new CEO after a merger and that it actually motivated him to run for governor — “to make Ohio more competitive than Texas.” But Democrats have seized on the optics, framing him as an absentee billionaire with no real stake in the state’s economic future.

“It’s really difficult for a billionaire who has spent $1 million of his own money on a private jet on the campaign to win the argument that he understands what people are going through,” one Democratic strategist told NOTUS.

Favorability and the outsider problem

Ramaswamy enters the general election with a 40% approval rating and a 41% disapproval rating — essentially upside down — according to earlier polling reported by NOTUS. Acton’s favorability numbers sit in the 30s, but she also carries far less name recognition, which analysts say gives her more room to grow.

Republican primary challenger Casey Putsch, a Northwest Ohio business owner, has made the outsider critique central to his campaign. “He clearly doesn’t care about the people of Ohio or America,” Putsch told the Ohio Capital Journal. “It’s kind of a globalist corporate billionaire interest.”

Ramaswamy has also been dealing with a persistent far-right harassment campaign on social media — a problem that drew enough attention that he publicly addressed it earlier this year, calling on his supporters to reject racism and bigotry. His accounts have faced an ongoing stream of slurs from accounts associated with segments of the far-right, according to the Ohio Capital Journal.

The Nazi reenactor donation

TiffinOhio.net previously reported that Ramaswamy’s campaign accepted a $500 donation on Aug. 15 from Richard Iott, a former northwest Ohio Republican congressional candidate whose 2010 House campaign collapsed after photographs emerged of him wearing a Nazi SS Waffen uniform. Iott participated in reenactments of the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, a unit linked to the genocide of Hungarian Jews, and previously told The Atlantic that Nazi Germany “accomplished incredible things” from a military standpoint. As of late February, Ramaswamy’s campaign had issued no statement on the donation and had not indicated plans to return the funds.

A tax plan with big questions

Ramaswamy has centered his campaign on eliminating Ohio’s personal income tax, pitching the policy as an economic engine that would drive business back to the state. A February 2026 report from Innovation Ohio found that the proposal would create a nearly $10 billion hole in the state budget — roughly 21% of the General Revenue Fund. The analysis concluded the plan would require either a 20% increase in property taxes or a 65% hike in sales taxes to offset the lost revenue, and would trigger cuts to Medicaid, public schools, and local services including police and fire departments. Innovation Ohio noted that Kansas attempted a similar approach in 2012; the Republican-controlled legislature reversed the cuts years later after the state saw slower population growth, education funding reductions, and multiple credit rating downgrades.

Acton’s path

Acton, a physician who served as Ohio Department of Health director under DeWine, has leaned heavily on her biography — raised in Youngstown, a working-class background she contrasts directly with Ramaswamy’s billionaire profile. She raised $5 million in 2025, a record for a Democratic gubernatorial nominee in an off-year election, though Ramaswamy’s $19.8 million haul dwarfs that figure.

Women voters have been a key factor in Acton’s rise. In August, women were split nearly evenly between the two candidates. By December, women had shifted toward Acton, breaking for her 56% to 37%, according to Emerson College Polling Director Spencer Kimball. The February numbers suggest that shift has continued.

The historical hill

Despite Acton’s lead, the structural math in Ohio still favors Republicans. Democrats have not won a gubernatorial election in Ohio since Ted Strickland’s 2006 victory. The Ohio Republican Party controls the governorship, both U.S. Senate seats, a legislative supermajority, and nearly every seat on the Ohio Supreme Court.

Still, the trend line in polling is difficult for Ramaswamy’s campaign to dismiss. A 20-point swing in the head-to-head matchup — from Ramaswamy +10 to Acton +10 — over a six-month stretch is a significant shift for a race still eight months from Election Day.

The May 5 primary is the next major milestone. Ramaswamy is expected to win the Republican nomination. Acton faces no significant Democratic opposition.

Today's SNAFU

Markets hate uncertainty.



Panic-stricken markets are losing faith in Donald Trump

The president’s contradictory statements on the Iran war have sent trading into chaos


In roughly 14 years of trading oil, including during the pandemic when crude prices briefly went negative, Greg Newman has never seen a market like this.

“It’s almost a broken market. People don’t know what to do,” the chief executive of Onyx Commodities says.

Onyx employs 60 traders across London, Dubai and Singapore who buy and sell oil contracts covering things such as crude oil and jet fuel. They trade with everyone from oil producers to trading houses and hedge funds, helping the market flow.

Knowing which way prices are going is a key part of the job: buy high and sell low and you’ll soon be out of business.

Yet working out where oil will go as war rages in the Middle East has proved unusually difficult.

Past crises also saw wild swings in the price of oil but the big physical trading houses, which have vast control over oil flows and the hedge funds that have become increasingly prominent players were still largely in control.

This time, it’s different. The reason? Donald Trump, the US president.

Oil has been sensitive to Trump’s comments about the US war in Iran. Yet his view of it seems to change hour by hour.

As oil futures began to trade in Asia on Sunday night, prices surged close to $120 a barrel as the US president said expensive fuel was a “small price to pay” for world peace.

Yet by Monday afternoon, Trump was saying the war in Iran was “very complete, pretty much”, sending crude prices plummeting to below $90. It was the biggest daily swing in dollar terms on record.

Hours later, Trump threatened to hit Iran “20 times harder” if they blocked oil flows, prompting another rise in prices.

The course of the war matters hugely to oil prices. Around a fifth of the world’s supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow Gulf waterway shut by Iran since the conflict began.

The International Energy Agency has said the disruption is the biggest shock to supply in history.

Trump’s stream of often contradictory statements on the future of the war has left oil prices on a roller-coaster ride.

“This week, everyone in the industry feels like we’re in a washing machine on spin mode,” says Pierre Chapuis, the head of petroleum and green fuels trading at Axpo, Switzerland’s largest energy company. “You come home and put the TV on, and you watch live news. We’re constantly glued to our phones.”

He adds: “I was talking with some colleagues on the desk. We have the feeling that we’re binge-watching Netflix. You want to know what’s happening next.

“You know it is coming in imminently, and it will be unexpected. Eventually, you say it cannot be true, but it is. That’s a bit the way that we’re following the news [from the White House].”

‘Headlines remain unreliable’

The Trump administration has shown an extreme willingness to put downward pressure on the cost of oil, with rumours that the treasury department was even considering actively trading oil futures contracts in an effort to tame prices.

The president’s public statements on the war often appear to be part of that campaign, with Trump trying to talk down the price even as ships burn in the waters off Iran.

Yet the increasingly contradictory nature of his statements has left many questioning whether they can trust the messaging coming from the administration.

Prices whipsawed earlier in the week after Chris Wright, Trump’s energy secretary, posted on X that the US navy was escorting an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz, before promptly deleting the message.

The White House denied any escort shortly after and said the incident was an error. Yet, it didn’t stop Iran’s foreign minister from accusing the Trump administration of deliberate market manipulation.

“US officials are posting fake news to manipulate markets,” Seyed Abbas Araghchi posted on X. “It won’t protect them from inflationary tsunami they’ve imposed on Americans.”

Paul Gooden, the head of global natural resources at asset manager Ninety One, says a “PR battle” is raging over oil. While Trump insists prices will soon “drop very rapidly”, Iran is telling the world to brace for $200 a barrel.

“Headlines remain unreliable,” Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates, part of the world’s largest energy and commodities broker, says. “Headlines remain very difficult to try to translate or interpret, but their impact ever since the Iranian crisis broke out is much larger than before.”

A trader at a London firm puts it more succinctly: “If you’re trading just on [headlines], you’re just gonna get f-----.”

Some of the world’s largest hedge funds and trading houses have found themselves caught offside. One hedge fund run by Caxton Associates reportedly lost at least $600m (£449m) in this month’s market upheaval.

Trafigura, one of the four largest commodity trading firms in the world, secured an extra $3bn banking facility to defend against any possible margin calls.

Hedge fund Citadel’s flagship Wellington fund lost 2pc last week, while Balyasny Asset Management dropped by 3.5pc. Two of its senior energy traders, Toby Sheppard and Max Iakovlev, left the firm last week, according to Bloomberg. A reason wasn’t given.

“They don’t know what’s going to happen, certainly minute to minute, but even day to day,” Newman says, referring to the hedge funds and trading houses. “So even they’re getting called out. Whereas clearly some people do know what’s going on. Political information and timely information is evidently everything.”

Some observers think they have the answer. Adam Kobeissi, a US analyst who runs an investment newsletter, claims to have identified Trump’s “conflict playbook”. It begins with intense pressure to strike a deal before rapid escalation and then de-escalation.

“One of the most overlooked elements of this strategy is the degree to which financial markets themselves become part of the negotiation environment,” the Kobeissi Letter, his X account, wrote earlier this month. “President Trump has consistently demonstrated awareness of equity market performance, energy prices, and inflation expectations as components of broader political optics.”

The US president’s sensitivity to markets led to speculation that “Taco” Trump could be returning earlier this week when he called a press conference in the wake of oil’s surge to $120. The “Taco” nickname – Trump always chickens out – came after he backed away from the worst of his trade war following a vicious market reaction.

Yet this time, Trump is trying to have his cake and eat it too. Asked at the Monday press conference whether the war was escalating or “very complete” as Trump had suggested, he replied: “You could say both.”

The result is confusion and significant volatility in oil.

‘Too much volatility is a killer’

Chapuis has traded oil for two decades. This week has been the most “intense” moment of his career.

“You’re so focused. We even forget about lunches and meetings,” he says.

The situation is far more complicated than previous periods of turmoil, such as the pandemic or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“This time, it’s so complex,” Chapuis says. “You have the Middle East, Israel, the States, then you have Europe that might step into it. Then you have Hormuz, then you have some fields that are shutting down.”

He adds: “We never had an environment that was as concentrated in terms of so many different events all over and all at once as what we have at the moment.”

He and his team buy and sell future contracts rather than physical oil barrels, providing producers, refiners and retailers with an ability to hedge against the risk of price swings.

Normally, having some movement in prices helps traders make money. But too much, and it can turn existential.

“Too much volatility is a killer. [It] can destroy the market,” says Chapuis.

When prices swing by as much as 30pc, it can trigger margin calls where banks that have lent people money to trade with ask for more capital to back up the position. Traders unable to do so risk getting wiped out, creating yet more volatility.

“The market volatility that we see right now is very unhealthy, especially when you’re talking about headline-driven swings that are confusing every market player,” Chapuis says.

“You have some funds that are used to manoeuvre more steady environments. And then all of a sudden, a black swan like this one happens, and it is very difficult for them then to manage it.”

Rumours are circulating in the City about entire teams being sacked on the spot after incurring big losses.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that price setters are struggling to provide accurate benchmarks for some of the world’s major oil grades. S&P Global Energy, better known as Platts, was forced to revise its methodology for its key Dubai oil price earlier this month after energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz were brought to a halt.

The uncertainty has led some traders to draw back from the market, leading prices to become increasingly untethered from reality.

“You just see people just trying to get the bare minimum done,” Newman at Onyx Commodities in London says. “It’s gotten to the point where it’s not healthy for this market.”

Chapuis believes there is no point trying to chase Trump’s statements, given how contradictory they can be.

Instead, he relies on a network of analysts monitoring the situation in the Middle East and Iran around the clock. Then Chapuis and his team make calls and try to stick to them.

“You need to be very, very strict and disciplined. You need to go into a trade with a clear plan and stops,” he says.

That’s easier said than done. One oil trader who has been in the market for more than a decade says every moment away from his screens has become “pure stress and anxiety”.

“You don’t have any confidence that [Trump] knows what he wants to do,” he says.

The last two Sundays have seen him trade at his desk at his home in Kent when the oil markets open at 11pm, getting only a few hours’ sleep between 2am and 6am before trading throughout each weekday.

“It’s hard to trade with any confidence and have any strong belief in your trade because it can just change on the flip of a dime,” the oil trader adds.


Every time things appear calmer, something else happens. Often, it’s a message on Truth Social from the president.


Transparency

The self-dealing is blatant.


Today's Stoopid

“The only thing prohibiting transit in the Strait right now is Iran shooting at shipping. It is open for transit should Iran not do that.”
--Pete Hegseth














Your Friday Amanda


Long Term Pain

... and short term "gain". That's a cute way to put it, but I can't see any kind of gain for anybody. 

Maybe Trump gets a bit of a delay in The Epstein Files drama, but that's not going away. In fact, the war just amplifies the suspicion for most people.

A hundred years from now, we'll still be the bad guys in this one. And we won't have to wait anywhere near that long to see the shit back up on us. It's already started.


Today's Today


Happy Triskaidekaphobia Day


Triskaidekaphobia is the fear of 13, a number commonly associated with bad luck in Western culture. While fear of the number 13 can be traced back to medieval times, the word triskaidekaphobia itself is of recent vintage, having been first coined by Coriat (1911; Simpson and Weiner 1992). It seems to have first appeared in the general media in a Nov. 8, 1953 New York Times article covering discussions of a United Nations committee.

This superstition leads some people to fear or avoid anything involving the number 13. In particular, this leads to interesting practices such as the numbering of floors as 1, 2, ..., 11, 12, 14, 15, ... (OEIS A011760; the "elevator sequence"), omitting the number 13, in many high-rise American hotels, the numbering of streets avoiding 13th Avenue, and so on.

Apparently, 13 hasn't always been considered unlucky. In fact, it appears that in ancient times, 13 was either considered in a positive light or (more commonly) not at all (Adams). The association of bad luck with the number 13 has been attributed to the fact there were 13 people at the Last Supper of Jesus, although this association seems to have originated only in medieval times.

The association has also been linked to that fact that lunisolar calendars (such as the Hebrew and Chinese calendars) must have 13 months in some years in order to synchronize the solar and lunar cycles, while the solar Gregorian calendar in universal current usage always has 12 months in a year.

Triskaidekaphobia also may be related to Norse mythology, which tells how the god Odin invited eleven of his closest friends to a dinner party at his home in Valhalla, only to have his party crashed by Loki, the god of evil and turmoil, thus giving a total of 13 people. The legend further relates how Balder, one of the most beloved gods, tried to throw Loki out of the party, resulting in a scuffle and ultimately Balder's death with a mistletoe-tipped arrow.

Fear of the number 13 also leads to fear of Friday the thirteenth (a fear recently dubbed paraskevidekatriaphobia), despite the fact that Friday turns out to be the most common weekday on which the 13th of a month can occur in the Gregorian calendar. The association of bad luck with Friday appeared in Chaucer's Canterbury Tales in the late 14th century ("and on a Friday fell all this misfortune"), but references to Friday as a day associated with ill luck in general first appear around the middle of the 17th century (Mikkelson and Mikkelson). In particular, it appeared in numerous publications as a particularly unlucky day to start a new venture (beginning a journey, giving birth, getting married, moving, starting a new job, etc.) beginning around 1800 (Mikkelson and Mikkelson).

While 13 is associated with the number of people at the Last Supper, the Crucifixion took place on a Friday, thus leading to an association of back luck with the combination of this number and day. Note that the association of Friday the thirteenth with the arrest of Jacques de Molay, Grand Master of the Knights Templar, on Friday, October 13, 1307 by King Philippe IV of France--as repeated, for example, in D. Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code (Brown 2003, p. 163)--is a modern-day invention (Mikkelson and Mikkelson).

Paraskevidekatriaphobia is probably the most widespread superstition in the United States, possibly affecting tens of millions of Americans. Interestingly, a study by Scanlon et al. (1993) published in the prestigious British Medical Journal which analyzed the relation between health, behavior, and superstition surrounding Friday 13th in the United Kingdom by comparing the ratio of traffic volume to traffic accidents on Friday the 6th and Friday the 13th over a period of years found that, "The risk of hospital admission as a result of a transport accident may be increased by as much as 52%. Staying at home is recommended."

While there does not appear to be hard evidence to support the claim, it has been suggested that $800 to $900 million are lost each Friday the 13th (Roach 2004) as a result of people avoiding travel, wedding plans, moving, and so on.