WIth all the negative sentiment toward The Gummint that's been building up over the last 30 years, it's a little surprising we haven't seen more home-grown attacks like the bombing in Oklahoma City, especially considering the relentless rhetorical assault on W, and now Obama.
So I wonder about the intended affects of all this Security Theater. The apparent aim is to prevent attacks from the outside, but since government almost never tells us the real reasons for what they do, is it not possible that a big part of what DHS is doing is aimed at keeping US citizens quiet as well?
When will we see the first strike against Wall St? or Bank of America? or whatever?
Will most of us condemn the attackers as domestic terrorists? Or will we see the rise of the new American anti-hero? - the kind of people who were robbing banks in the 1930s' who were hunted down (and mostly shot down like dogs) by the Feds; but were lionized by a big bunch of people who saw the actions of the outlaws more in terms of simple payback against a system that had become corrupt and oppressive.
How bad do things hafta get before Blowin' Shit Up becomes a reasonable response?
Take a look at this by Bruce Schneier.
No comments:
Post a Comment