It's A Wonderment

In a democracy - Representative Democracy; Democratic Republic; Republican Democracy; whatever - shouldn't it actually be a good thing for the government to grow in size appropriate to the population?

In 1790, there were about 33,000 people for every Congress Critter in the House of Representatives.  Right now, every Critter "represents" more than 700,000 Americans.

If we're supposed to be self-governed; if the individual is supposed to have the power; then why do we insist on diluting that power by keeping the number of Reps the same while the population increases?  Every Critter "represents" 21 times the number of citizens now as they represented in 1790.  It may not be a straight 1-to-1 thing, but to me that means each Critter's power is something like 21 times greater than it used to be, and each citizen's power has gone down by 95%.

I don't like Big Government any better than I like Big Union, or Big Oil, or Big Anything - but if we simply go blindly along with this knee-jerk rhetorical aversion to 'gubmint', then we're delivering more and more power into fewer and fewer hands - which makes the government "bigger" in the only way that matters - thereby accomplishing the very thing we say we're trying to avoid.

It's a wonderment.