It took three ER visits and 20 hours before a hospital admitted Nevaeh Crain, 18, as her condition worsened. Doctors insisted on two ultrasounds to confirm âfetal demise.â Sheâs one of at least two Texas women who died under the stateâs abortion ban.
Candace Fails screamed for someone in the Texas hospital to help her pregnant daughter. âDo something,â she pleaded, on the morning of Oct. 29, 2023.
Nevaeh Crain was crying in pain, too weak to walk, blood staining her thighs. Feverish and vomiting the day of her baby shower, the 18-year-old had gone to two different emergency rooms within 12 hours, returning home each time worse than before.
The first hospital diagnosed her with strep throat without investigating her sharp abdominal cramps. At the second, she screened positive for sepsis, a life-threatening and fast-moving reaction to an infection, medical records show. But doctors said her six-month fetus had a heartbeat and that Crain was fine to leave.
Now on Crainâs third hospital visit, an obstetrician insisted on two ultrasounds to âconfirm fetal demise,â a nurse wrote, before moving her to intensive care.
By then, more than two hours after her arrival, Crainâs blood pressure had plummeted and a nurse had noted that her lips were âblue and dusky.â Her organs began failing.
Hours later, she was dead.

Fails, who would have seen her daughter turn 20 this Friday, still cannot understand why Crainâs emergency was not treated like an emergency.
But that is what many pregnant women are now facing in states with strict abortion bans, doctors and lawyers have told ProPublica.
âPregnant women have become essentially untouchables,â said Sara Rosenbaum, a health law and policy professor emerita at George Washington University.
Texasâs abortion ban threatens prison time for interventions that end a fetal heartbeat, whether the pregnancy is wanted or not. It includes exceptions for life-threatening conditions, but still, doctors told ProPublica that confusion and fear about the potential legal repercussions are changing the way their colleagues treat pregnant patients with complications.
In states with abortion bans, such patients are sometimes bounced between hospitals like âhot potatoes,â with health care providers reluctant to participate in treatment that could attract a prosecutor, doctors told ProPublica. In some cases, medical teams are wasting precious time debating legalities and creating documentation, preparing for the possibility that theyâll need to explain their actions to a jury and judge.
Dr. Jodi Abbott, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Boston University School of Medicine, said patients are left wondering: âAm I being sent home because I really am OK? Or am I being sent home because theyâre afraid that the solution to whatâs going on with my pregnancy would be ending the pregnancy, and theyâre not allowed to do that?â
There is a federal law to prevent emergency room doctors from withholding lifesaving care.
Passed nearly four decades ago, it requires emergency rooms to stabilize patients in medical crises. The Biden administration argues this mandate applies even in cases where an abortion might be necessary.
No state has done more to fight this interpretation than Texas, which has warned doctors that its abortion ban supersedes the administrationâs guidance on federal law, and that they can face up to 99 years in prison for violating it.
ProPublica condensed more than 800 pages of Crainâs medical records into a four-page timeline in consultation with two maternal-fetal medicine specialists; reporters reviewed it with nine doctors, including researchers at prestigious universities, OB-GYNs who regularly handle miscarriages, and experts in emergency medicine and maternal health.
Some said the first ER missed warning signs of infection that deserved attention. All said that the doctor at the second hospital should never have sent Crain home when her signs of sepsis hadnât improved. And when she returned for the third time, all said there was no medical reason to make her wait for two ultrasounds before taking aggressive action to save her.
âThis is how these restrictions kill women,â said Dr. Dara Kass, a former regional director at the Department of Health and Human Services and an emergency room physician in New York. âIt is never just one decision, itâs never just one doctor, itâs never just one nurse.â
While they were not certain from looking at the records provided that Crainâs death could have been prevented, they said it may have been possible to save both the teenager and her fetus if she had been admitted earlier for close monitoring and continuous treatment.
There was a chance Crain could have remained pregnant, they said. If she had needed an early delivery, the hospital was well-equipped to care for a baby on the edge of viability. In another scenario, if the infection had gone too far, ending the pregnancy might have been necessary to save Crain.
Doctors involved in Crainâs care did not respond to several requests for comment. The two hospitals, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas and Christus Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth, declined to answer detailed lists of questions about her treatment.
Fails and Crain believed abortion was morally wrong. The teen could only support it in the context of rape or life-threatening illness, she used to tell her mother. They didnât care whether the government banned it, just how their Christian faith guided their own actions.
When they discovered Crain was pregnant with a girl, the two talked endlessly about the little dresses they could buy, what kind of mother she would be. Crain landed on the name Lillian. Fails could not wait to meet her.
But when her daughter got sick, Fails expected that doctors had an obligation to do everything in their power to stave off a potentially deadly emergency, even if that meant losing Lillian. In her view, they were more concerned with checking the fetal heartbeat than attending to Crain.
âI know it sounds selfish, and God knows I would rather have both of them, but if I had to choose,â Fails said, âI would have chosen my daughter.â
âIâm in a Lot of Painâ
Crain had just graduated from high school in her hometown of Vidor, Texas, in May of 2023 when she learned that she was pregnant.
She and her boyfriend of two years, Randall Broussard, were always hip to hip, wrestling over vapes or snuggling on the couch watching vampire movies. Crain was drawn to how gentle he was. He admired how easily she built friendships and how quickly she could make people laugh. Though they were young, theyâd already imagined starting a family. Broussard, who has eight siblings, wanted many kids; Crain wanted a daughter and the kind of relationship she had with her mom. Earlier that year, Broussard had given Crain a small diamond ring â âa promise,â he told her, âthat I will always love you.â
On the morning of their baby shower, Oct. 28, 2023, Crain woke with a headache. Her mom decorated the house with pink balloons and Crain laid out Halloween-themed platters. Soon, nausea set in. Crain started vomiting and was running a fever. When guests arrived, Broussard opened gifts â onesies and diapers and bows â while Crain kept closing her eyes.
Around 3 p.m., her family told her she needed to go to the hospital.
Broussard drove Crain to Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas. They sat in the waiting room for four hours. When Crain started vomiting, staff brought her a plastic pan. When she wasnât retching, she lay her head in her boyfriendâs lap.
New here?
A nurse practitioner ordered a test for strep throat, which came back positive, medical records show. But in a pregnant patient, abdominal pain and vomiting should not be quickly attributed to strep, physicians told ProPublica; a doctor should have also evaluated her pregnancy.
Instead, Baptist Hospitals discharged her with a prescription for antibiotics. She was home at 9 p.m. and quickly dozed off, but within hours, she woke her mother up. âMom, my stomach is still hurting,â she said into the dark bedroom at 3 a.m. âIâm in a lot of pain.â
Fails drove Broussard and Crain to another hospital in town, Christus Southeast Texas St. Elizabeth. Around 4:20 a.m., OB-GYN William Hawkins saw that Crain had a temperature of 102.8 and an abnormally high pulse, according to records; a nurse noted that Crain rated her abdominal pain as a seven out of 10.
Her vital signs pointed to possible sepsis, records show. Itâs standard medical practice to immediately treat patients who show signs of sepsis, which can overtake and kill a person quickly, medical experts told ProPublica. These patients should be watched until their vitals improve. Through tests and scans, the goal is to find the source of the infection. If the infection was in Crainâs uterus, the fetus would likely need to be removed with a surgery.
In a room at the obstetric emergency department, a nurse wrapped a sensor belt around Crainâs belly to check the fetal heart rate. âBabyâs fine,â Broussard told Fails, who was sitting in the hallway.
After two hours of IV fluids, one dose of antibiotics, and some Tylenol, Crainâs fever didnât go down, her pulse remained high, and the fetal heart rate was abnormally fast, medical records show. Hawkins noted that Crain had strep and a urinary tract infection, wrote up a prescription and discharged her.
Hawkins had missed infections before. Eight years earlier, the Texas Medical Board found that he had failed to diagnose appendicitis in one patient and syphilis in another. In the latter case, the board noted that his error âmay have contributed to the fetal demise of one of her twins.â The board issued an order to have Hawkinsâ medical practice monitored; the order was lifted two years later. (Hawkins did not respond to several attempts to reach him.)
All of the doctors who reviewed Crainâs vital signs for ProPublica said she should have been admitted. âShe should have never left, never left,â said Elise Boos, an OB-GYN in Tennessee.
Kass, the New York emergency physician, put it in starker terms: When they discharged her, they were âpushing her down the path of no return.â
âItâs bullshit,â Fails said as Broussard rolled Crain out in a wheelchair; she was unable to walk on her own. Fails had expected the hospital to keep her overnight. Her daughter was breathing heavily, hunched over in pain, pale in the face. Normally talkative, the teen was quiet.
Back home, around 7 a.m., Fails tried to get her daughter comfortable as she cried and moaned. She told Fails she needed to pee, and her mother helped her into the bathroom. âMom, come here,â she said from the toilet. Blood stained her underwear.
The blood confirmed Failsâ instinct: This was a miscarriage.
At 9 a.m, a full day after the nausea began, they were back at Christus St. Elizabeth. Crainâs lips were drained of color and she kept saying she was going to pass out. Staff started her on IV antibiotics and performed a bedside ultrasound.
Around 9:30 a.m., the OB on duty, Dr. Marcelo Totorica, couldnât find a fetal heart rate, according to records; he told the family he was sorry for their loss.
Standard protocol when a critically ill patient experiences a miscarriage is to stabilize her and, in most cases, hurry to the operating room for delivery, medical experts said. This is especially urgent with a spreading infection. But at Christus St. Elizabeth, the OB-GYN just continued antibiotic care. A half-hour later, as nurses placed a catheter, Fails noticed her daughterâs thighs were covered in blood.
At 10 a.m., Melissa McIntosh, a labor and delivery nurse, spoke to Totorica about Crainâs condition. The teen was now having contractions. âDr. Totorica states to not move patient,â she wrote after talking with him. âDr. Totorica states there is a slight chance patient may need to go to ICU and he wants the bedside ultrasound to be done stat for sure before admitting to room.â
Though he had already performed an ultrasound, he was asking for a second.
The first hadnât preserved an image of Crainâs womb in the medical record. âBedside ultrasounds arenât always set up to save images permanently,â said Abbott, the Boston OB-GYN.
The stateâs laws banning abortion require that doctors record the absence of a fetal heartbeat before intervening with a procedure that could end a pregnancy. Exceptions for medical emergencies demand physicians document their reasoning. âPretty consistently, people say, âUntil we can be absolutely certain this isnât a normal pregnancy, we canât do anything, because it could be alleged that we were doing an abortion,ââ said Dr. Tony Ogburn, an OB-GYN in San Antonio.
At 10:40 a.m, Crainâs blood pressure was dropping. Minutes later, Totorica was paging for an emergency team over the loudspeakers.
Around 11 a.m., two hours after Crain had arrived at the hospital, a second ultrasound was performed. A nurse noted: âBedside ultrasound at this time to confirm fetal demise per Dr. Totoricaâs orders.â
When doctors wheeled Crain into the ICU at 11:20 a.m., Fails stayed by her side, rubbing her head, as her daughter dipped in and out of consciousness. Crain couldnât sign consent forms for her care because of âextreme pain,â according to the records, so Fails signed a release for âunplanned dilation and curettageâ or âunplanned cesarean section.â
But the doctors quickly decided it was now too risky to operate, according to records. They suspected that she had developed a dangerous complication of sepsis known as disseminated intravascular coagulation; she was bleeding internally.
Frantic and crying, Fails locked eyes with her daughter. âYouâre strong, Nevaeh,â she said. âGod made us strong.â
âThe Law Is on Our Sideâ
Crain is one of at least two pregnant Texas women who died after doctors delayed treating miscarriages, ProPublica found.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has successfully made his state the only one in the country that isnât required to follow the Biden administrationâs efforts to ensure that emergency departments donât turn away patients like Crain.
After the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion, the administration issued guidance on how states with bans should follow the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. The federal law requires hospitals that receive funding through Medicare â which is virtually all of them â to stabilize or transfer anyone who arrives in their emergency rooms. That goes for pregnant patients, the guidance argues, even if that means violating state law and providing an abortion.
Paxton responded by filing a lawsuit in 2022, saying the federal guidance âforces hospitals and doctors to commit crimes,â and was an âattempt to use federal law to transform every emergency room in the country into a walk-in abortion clinic.â
Part of the battle has centered on who is eligible for abortion. The federal EMTALA guidelines apply when the health of the pregnant patient is in âserious jeopardy.â Thatâs a wider range of circumstances than the Texas abortion restriction, which only makes exceptions for a ârisk of deathâ or âa serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function.â
The lawsuit worked its way through three layers of federal courts, and each time it was met by judges nominated by former President Donald Trump, whose court appointments were pivotal to overturning Roe v. Wade.
After U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix, a Trump appointee, quickly sided with Texas, Paxton celebrated the triumph over âleft-wing bureaucrats in Washington.â
âThe decision last night proves what we knew all along,â Paxton added. âThe law is on our side.â
This year, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit upheld the order in a ruling authored by Kurt D. Engelhardt, another judge nominated by Trump.
The Biden administration appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, urging the justices to make it clear that some emergency abortions are allowed.
Even amid news of preventable deaths related to abortion bans, the Supreme Court declined to do so last month.
Paxton called this âa major victoryâ for the stateâs abortion ban.
He has also made clear that he will bring charges against physicians for performing abortions if he decides that the cases donât fall within Texasâ narrow medical exceptions.
Last year, he sent a letter threatening to prosecute a doctor who had received court approval to provide an emergency abortion for a Dallas woman. He insisted that the doctor and her patient had not proven how, precisely, the patientâs condition threatened her life.
Many doctors say this kind of message has encouraged doctors to âpuntâ patients instead of treating them.
Since the abortion bans went into effect, an OB-GYN at a major hospital in San Antonio has seen an uptick in pregnant patients being sent to them from across Southern Texas, as they suffer from complications that could easily be treated close to home.
The well-resourced hospital is perceived to have more institutional support to provide abortions and miscarriage management, the doctor said. Other providers âare transferring those patients to our centers because, frankly, they donât want to deal with them.â
After Crain died, Fails couldnât stop thinking about how Christus Southeast Hospital had ignored her daughterâs condition. âShe was bleeding,â she said. âWhy didnât they do anything to help it along instead of wait for another ultrasound to confirm the baby is dead?â
It was the medical examiner, not the doctors at the hospital, who removed Lillian from Crainâs womb. His autopsy didnât resolve Failsâ lingering questions about what the hospitals missed and why. He called the death ânaturalâ and attributed it to âcomplications of pregnancy.â He did note, however, that Crain was ârepeatedly seeking medical care for a progressive illnessâ just before she died.
Last November, Fails reached out to medical malpractice lawyers to see about getting justice through the courts. A different legal barrier now stood in her way.
If Crain had experienced these same delays as an inpatient, Fails would have needed to establish that the hospital violated medical standards. That, she believed, she could do. But because the delays and discharges occurred in an area of the hospital classified as an emergency room, lawyers said that Texas law set a much higher burden of proof: âwillful and wanton negligence.â
No lawyer has agreed to take the case.
If Crain had experienced these same delays as an inpatient, Fails would have needed to establish that the hospital violated medical standards. That, she believed, she could do. But because the delays and discharges occurred in an area of the hospital classified as an emergency room, lawyers said that Texas law set a much higher burden of proof: âwillful and wanton negligence.â
No lawyer has agreed to take the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment