#ActInTimeDEADLINETime left to limit global warming to 1.5°C 4YRS097DAYS19:42:25 LIFELINEWorld's energy from renewables14.809727211%Nature protection is part of fundamental law in Amazon countries | One lawyer's groundbreaking work in shaping climate law | California tribes rekindle ancient fire traditions to heal the land & themselves | EU expects to add record renewable capacity in 2025 | Lego opens solar-powered Vietnam factory to cut emissions & supply Asia | Africa is proof that investing in climate resilience works | New global fund for forests is a bold experiment in conservation finance | Clean power provided 40% of the world's electricity last year | Cape Cod pilot brings clean energy upgrades to low-income homes | Nations are considering to set the 1st global tax on emissions for shipping | Nature protection is part of fundamental law in Amazon countries | One lawyer's groundbreaking work in shaping climate law | California tribes rekindle ancient fire traditions to heal the land & themselves | EU expects to add record renewable capacity in 2025 | Lego opens solar-powered Vietnam factory to cut emissions & supply Asia | Africa is proof that investing in climate resilience works | New global fund for forests is a bold experiment in conservation finance | Clean power provided 40% of the world's electricity last year | Cape Cod pilot brings clean energy upgrades to low-income homes | Nations are considering to set the 1st global tax on emissions for shipping |

Feb 20, 2014

Logical Fallacy #2 - False Cause




There's a good number of sub-headings under False Cause (aka: Questionable Cause).
I grabbed this one from Wikipedia just cuz it's my fave:
Post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin: "after this, therefore because of this") is a logical fallacy (of the questionable cause variety) that states "Since event Y followed event X, event Y must have been caused by event X." It is often shortened to simply post hoc. It is subtly different from the fallacy cum hoc ergo propter hoc (correlation does not imply causation), in which two things or events occur simultaneously or the chronological ordering is insignificant or unknown. Post hoc is a particularly tempting error because temporal sequence appears to be integral to causality. The fallacy lies in coming to a conclusion based solely on the order of events, rather than taking into account other factors that might rule out the connection.

No comments:

Post a Comment