Slouching Towards Oblivion

Sunday, July 17, 2022

Today's Lesson

Allan Savory is a Zimbabwean scientist, livestock farmer, and president and co-founder of the Savory Institute. He originated Holistic management, a systems thinking approach to managing resources.

Savory advocates using bunched and moving livestock to what he claims mimics nature, as a means to heal the environment, stating "only livestock can reverse desertification. There is no other known tool available to humans with which to address desertification that is contributing not only to climate change but also to much of the poverty, emigration, violence, etc. in the seriously affected regions of the world."

"Only livestock can save us." He believes grasslands hold the potential to sequester enough atmospheric carbon dioxide to reverse climate change. Praised by cattle farmers, his controversial ideas have sparked opposition from academics; ranging from debate on evidence for treatment effects to the scope of the potential impact for carbon sequestration.

Savory received the 2003 Banksia International Award and won the 2010 Buckminster Fuller Challenge. Prince Charles called him "a remarkable man" and noted farmer Joel Salatin wrote, "History will vindicate Allan Savory as one of the greatest ecologists of all time."

In contrast, James E. McWilliams described Savory as having "adherence to scientifically questionable conclusions in the face of evidence to the contrary". George Monbiot said of him, "his statements are not supported by empirical evidence and experimental work, and that in crucial respects his techniques do more harm than good." However, this comment has been subject to criticism in a later article published in The Guardian by Hunter Lovins, titled "Why George Monbiot is wrong: grazing livestock can save the world".


TED Talk - "Desertification is a fancy word for land that is turning to desert"


It sounds perfectly logical, and definitely something we should be trying, even though "mimicking nature" is a pretty tall order, and often a pretty good indication that we're being almost naively hubristic thinking we can just "do as nature does" when we can't possibly know everything nature knows.

That said, we have to take a very broad approach, and at least be willing to consider practically every idea.

BTW: I can't think of the last time I heard an environmentalist admit he arranged for the killing of 40,000 elephants, and then go on to say straight out that it was a fucked up stoopid thing to do.

No comments:

Post a Comment