Showing posts with label public health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public health. Show all posts

Oct 9, 2025

Belle Explains




Six surgeons general: It’s our duty to warn the nation about RFK Jr.

We took an oath to declare dangers when we found them. We’re doing that again today.


By Jerome Adams, Richard Carmona, Joycelyn Elders, Vivek Murthy, Antonia Novello and David Satcher

The writers are all former U.S. surgeons general.

As former U.S. surgeons general appointed by every Republican and Democratic president since George H.W. Bush, we have collectively spent decades in service as the Nation’s Doctor. We took two sacred oaths in our lifetimes: first, as physicians who swore to care for our patients and, second, as public servants who committed to protecting the health of all Americans.

Today, in keeping with those oaths, we are compelled to speak with one voice to say that the actions of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. are endangering the health of the nation. Never before have we issued a joint public warning like this. But the profound, immediate and unprecedented threat that Kennedy’s policies and positions pose to the nation’s health cannot be ignored.

Despite differences in perspectives, we have always been united in an unwavering commitment to science and evidence-based public health. It is that shared principle that led us to this moment.

Over recent months, we have watched with increasing alarm as the foundations of our nation’s public health system have been undermined. Science and expertise have taken a back seat to ideology and misinformation. Morale has plummeted in our health agencies, and talent is fleeing at a time when we face rising threats — from resurgent infectious diseases to worsening chronic illnesses.

Repairing this damage requires a leader who respects scientific integrity and transparency, listens to experts and can restore trust to the federal health apparatus. Instead, Kennedy has become a driving force behind this crisis.

HHS is the one of the largest civilian agencies in the federal government, with a nearly $2 trillion budget and oversight of programs and agencies that touch every American family and business: Medicare, Medicaid, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and more. It requires steady, ethical leadership grounded in science.

By contrast, Kennedy has spent decades advancing dangerous and discredited claims about vaccines — most notoriously, the thoroughly discredited theory that childhood vaccines cause autism. He has promoted misinformation about the HPV vaccine, which protects against cervical cancer, and he has repeatedly misrepresented the risks of mRNA technology and coronavirus vaccines, despite their lifesaving impact during the pandemic.

This year, as the United States faced its worst measles outbreak in more than 30 years, Kennedy de-emphasized vaccination and directed agency resources toward unproven vitamin therapies. The result: months-long outbreak, three preventable deaths and the first measles-related child death in the U.S. in over two decades.

More recently, Kennedy removed every member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, replacing its scientific experts with individuals who often lacked basic qualifications, some of whom are vaccine conspiracy theorists. The new committee has already begun casting doubt on the hepatitis B vaccine for newborns, despite decades of data affirming its effectiveness and strong safety profile.

Discrediting vaccines undermines one of the most important public health tools in American history. Thanks to widespread immunization, we eradicated smallpox, eliminated polio in the U.S. and prevented an estimated 1.1 million deaths and 508 million infections among children born between 1994 and 2023. Operation Warp Speed, initiated under President Donald Trump, brought lifesaving mRNA vaccines to the world in record time.

Yet Kennedy continues to ignore science and the public’s wishes. Most recently, HHS proposed new warning labels on products containing acetaminophen (Tylenol), citing a supposed link between prenatal use and autism. This move has been widely condemned by the scientific and medical communities, who have pointed out that the available research is inconclusive and insufficient to justify such a warning. In an extraordinary and unprecedented response, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and other leading health organizations issued public guidance urging physicians and patients to disregard HHS’s recommendation. Instead of helping pregnant women make informed decisions during a critical period in their lives, Kennedy’s decisions risk causing confusion, fear and harm.

Rather than combating the rapid spread of health misinformation with facts and clarity, Kennedy is amplifying it. The consequences aren’t abstract. They are measured in lives lost, disease outbreaks and an erosion of public trust that will take years to rebuild.

It is essential to note that good science and public health require not only evidence but also people — the scientists, public health professionals and civil servants whose expertise protects millions of Americans. Yet under Kennedy’s leadership, the HHS workforce has been badly damaged. He has silenced and sidelined hundreds of scientists, public health officials and medical professionals, creating an atmosphere of fear and distrust. Many of the nation’s top public health professionals — people we have worked with during crises — have resigned or retired early. They describe a culture of intimidation, where scientific findings are censored, evidence is disregarded and career officials are pressured to rubber stamp conclusions that are not backed by science.

The shooting at CDC headquarters in Atlanta this year only deepened the crisis. As former commanding officers of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, we know that caring for your people is the sacred duty of a leader. Yet, in the face of tragedy, Kennedy denigrated CDC staff as corrupt and repeated conspiracy theories that contribute to the targeting of the very staff he is charged with protecting. We will not soon forget the heartbreaking calls we received from CDC employees, expressing how scared and betrayed they felt for simply doing their jobs to serve the American people.

It’s worth reminding ourselves what Kennedy puts at risk. The FDA approves lifesaving drugs and holds pharmaceutical companies to high standards of safety and effectiveness. NIH pursues and funds cutting-edge research. CDC leads in emergencies from pandemics to opioids to natural disasters. Agencies at HHS spearhead efforts to address issues regarding mental health, substance-use disorders, primary care shortages and health insurance coverage for millions of seniors, disabled individuals, and low-income Americans. Mismanaging HHS endangers America’s health, undermines national security and damages our economic resilience and international credibility.

America’s public health systems are essential to the well-being of the nation. We are clear-eyed about the fact that these systems need to be improved, including paying more attention to areas such as disease prevention, mental health and chronic illness. But reform must be grounded in truth, transparency and scientific evidence. Without this foundation, we risk not only halting progress but reversing it — costing lives in the process.

Secretary Kennedy is entitled to his views. But he is not entitled to put people’s health at risk. He has rejected science, misled the public and compromised the health of Americans. The nation deserves a health and human services secretary who is committed to scientific integrity and can restore morale and trust in our public health agencies. Having served at senior levels in government, we know that politics are complicated. But this is bigger than politics. It’s about putting the health of Americans first.

Sep 17, 2025

Trump Is Killing Us

He allowed DOGE to cut all funding to and through USAID. As a result, 12-15 million people will die.

His Big Bamboozle Bill cut a trillion dollars from healthcare, and hundreds of billions from research - cancer, diabetes, heart disease, birth anomalies, environmental risks, food and drug safety, perinatal care, Alzheimer's, and and and.

The ignorant pricks in Trump's White House, and the gutless fucks on Capitol Hill stand by doing nothing while childhood diseases are given a chance to kill kids - and adults - because of BKjr's unbelievably stupid conspiracy fantasies.

This shit hits home for all of us in one way or another. We're all no more than a couple of degrees separated from someone who has, or will have, some kind of cancer. Biden committed us to a moon-shot-level effort to find a cure for cancer, and Trump gutted it - because (IMO) it was Biden's thing.

This is going to get worse for quite a while, and the time we spend letting it get worse, will be orders of magnitude less than the time we'll have to spend trying to get back to where we were a lousy six months ago.

Trump's legacy is Cruelty, Immiseration, and Death.



Takeaways from fired CDC director’s Senate testimony

Susan Monarez told the Senate health committee that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pressured her to back changes to the childhood vaccine schedule.


Susan Monarez, who was fired last month as director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told senators Wednesday that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pressured her to support changes to the childhood vaccine schedule, subverting the agency’s scientific expertise and endangering public health.

The former CDC chief who served in the position for only 29 days, told the Senate’s health committee that Kennedy told her that “he spoke to the president every day about changing the childhood vaccine schedule” and that she “needed to be on board” with coming changes in September. The recommendations from the CDC call for administering multiple vaccines at key milestones, and potential changes to the schedule have alarmed major medical associations who worry the nation’s vaccine infrastructure may crack.

Monarez’s testimony on Capitol Hill marks her first public appearance since the White House fired her in late August. She told the panel she was fired for “holding the line on scientific integrity,” citing concerns about her ability to continue leading the agency while “preserving evidence-based decision-making.”

Throughout the hearing, some senators critical of Kennedy, who has an extensive history of anti-vaccine advocacy, sought to highlight what they believe is at stake: the potential for infectious diseases to reemerge and erosion of trust in public health. Some Republican senators allied with Kennedy pressed Monarez on the details of her meetings with Kennedy, casting her as out of step with the Trump administration and suggesting she was not trustworthy.

Monarez and her lawyers have accused Kennedy of pressuring her to rubber-stamp his vaccine policies and fire vaccine scientists. In a Senate hearing earlier this month, Kennedy told lawmakers he asked Monarez to resign because she admitted she was not “trustworthy,” while conceding that he asked her to fire senior staff.

Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesman, pushed back against Monarez’s testimony, alleging her remarks have “factual inaccuracies” and “leave out important details.” On X, the official HHS account highlighted testimony from Republican senators who were critical of Monarez during the hearing

“Here’s the reality: Susan Monarez was tasked with returning the CDC to its core mission after decades of bureaucratic inertia, politicized science and mission creep corroded its purpose and squandered public trust,” Nixon said in a statement. “Instead, she acted maliciously to undermine the President’s agenda and was fired as a result.”

Here are takeaways from the hearing:

Monarez alleged political interference
Monarez told senators that Kennedy demanded on Aug. 25 that she commit in advance to approving every recommendation from an influential vaccine advisory panel.

Kennedy recently purged the panel and replaced it with his handpicked members, many of whom have criticized coronavirus vaccine policy. Kennedy also directed her to dismiss career officials responsible for vaccine policy, she said, and to work with political appointees he had put in place at CDC instead of career scientists.

“I had refused to commit to approving vaccine recommendations without evidence, fire career officials without cause, or resign — and I had shared my concerns with this committee,” Monarez said. “I told the secretary that if he believed he could not trust me, he could fire me.”

Monarez also alleged that Kennedy said that agency employees were “killing children, and they don’t care.”

Before Monarez’s ouster, a top aide to Kennedy had informed her that all major CDC policy decisions needed prior political approval.

“I wanted to elevate the absolute need for political review of major policy decisions at CDC,” HHS Chief of Staff Matthew Buckham wrote in an Aug. 19 email, which was obtained and first reported by The Washington Post and highlighted by senators in the hearing. He added that Kennedy’s office and CDC political leadership should “have eyes on the decisions for approval/changes before they go into effect.”

Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said the process Buckham described “is nothing new.”

“As with all federal agencies, major policy and staffing decisions must go through established clearance channels,” he said in a statement. “Susan Monarez bypassed this established process, which is unacceptable.”

Childhood vaccine schedule in the spotlight
Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), the health committee’s chair, asked Monarez whether Kennedy ever discussed the childhood vaccine schedule.

During her testimony, Monarez said that Kennedy told her the schedule would be changing as of September — and that she “needed to be on board with it.” An influential vaccine advisory panel is set to meet Thursday and Friday to potentially vote on recommendations for hepatitis B administered to infants after birth and coronavirus vaccines.

Monarez also said Kennedy asked her speak to Aaron Siri, a lawyer for a top anti-vaccine organization and an ally to Kennedy. Siri previously petitioned the government to reconsider its approval of one of the polio vaccines.

In his confirmation hearings, Kennedy told senators “I support the childhood schedule,” but since he assumed the top health post, he has taken steps to revisit it. Public health experts have credited that schedule for reducing the spread of vaccine-preventable diseases and saving lives, while Kennedy and his allies have countered that it imposes too many shots on young children.

RFK Jr.'s showdown with the Senate
The health and human services secretary is facing fire from both sides of the aisle. Plus, red and blue states are splintering on vaccine policy.

Some of Kennedy’s allies on the panel, such as Sens. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) and Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), pressed Monarez on whether children receive too many shots. She said she was open to discussing the science but also defended the evidence around the schedule.

“The data associated with those recommendations has been validated and vetted, and that is the current schedule,” Monarez said in a response to questioning from Marshall.

Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said the agency will not restrict access to vaccines.

“We are simply restoring the doctor-patient relationship,” Nixon said. “Anyone can get a vaccine in consultation with their healthcare provider.”

The White House defended the administration’s vaccine plans, citing its recent MAHA Strategy Report that called for developing “the best” childhood vaccine recommendations in the world.

“No one, including Secretary Kennedy and President Trump, is calling to throw out the entire childhood vaccine schedule or eliminate access to lifesaving vaccines,” White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement. “Anyone suggesting that such actions are even on the table does not know what they are talking about.”

Ahead of a key vaccine meeting, hepatitis B vaccine gets airtime
Senators of both parties repeatedly brought up the hepatitis B vaccine ahead of a Thursday meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to reconsider the long-standing recommendation to provide the vaccine at birth. Such a move would mark the first major shift on a routine childhood immunization under Kennedy.

Democrats and Cassidy blasted the effort, arguing it could reverse progress to curtail a serious liver infection.

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) pressed Monarez on why newborns receive the shot — skepticism that Kennedy and his allies have echoed, arguing most children are not at risk.

“I was open to the science,” Monarez responded. “I just would not pre-commit to approving all the ACIP recommendations without the science.”

Cassidy, a gastroenterologist and liver specialist, gave a forceful defense of the hepatitis B vaccine in his closing remarks. He said the number of babies who get infected with hepatitis B has been substantially reduced since they began receiving the shot.

“That is an accomplishment to make America healthy again,” Cassidy said in reference to Kennedy’s MAHA movement to address chronic disease and childhood illness. “And we should stand up and salute the people that made that decision, because there’s people who would otherwise be dead if those mothers were not given that option to have their child vaccinated.”

Former top CDC career scientist said Kennedy bypassed scientific process
Earlier this year, Kennedy directed the CDC to no longer recommend the coronavirus vaccine for healthy pregnant women and healthy children. Debra Houry, the CDC’s former chief medical officer who resigned after Monarez’s ouster, said she learned of this from Kennedy’s X post announcing the move.

“After the tweet came out, we asked for a written memo from HHS because I couldn’t implement guidance off of a tweet,” Houry said.

Cassidy frames approach as ‘radical transparency’
Cassidy, who openly wrestled with whether to support Kennedy’s confirmation before voting for the nominee, said he invited Monarez to testify as a “direct response” to President Donald Trump’s call for “radical transparency” into how the government functions. Monarez said she was instructed not to speak directly to senators.

Cassidy is up for reelection next year and has had to weigh flexing his oversight power against a desire to remain in Trump’s good graces. He said he was inviting HHS officials, including Kennedy, to speak with the panel to rebutany remarks at Wednesday’s hearing.

“I don’t prejudge. I don’t know if you’re telling the truth or not. And when Secretary Kennedy comes, I’m keeping an open mind. Let me just say that,” Cassidy said in his closing remarks.

Republican senators allied with Kennedy rushed to his defense.

“Ma’am, all we’re looking for is you to be honest. And you haven’t been,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma) said. GOP senators also focused on Monarez’s decision to retain legal counsel, including an extended exchange with Sen. Ashley Moody (R-Florida) when Monarez balked at naming her lawyers Mark S. Zaid and Abbe Lowell. Zaid is a critic of Trump, while Lowell has counted members of Trump’s orbit such as Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump among his high-profile Washington clients.

Jun 2, 2025

MAHA

More from Rebecca Watson on bullshit public policy coming from BKjr's gang at HHS.

And the main problem seems to be that we're allowing these jagoffs to run the joint almost solely on the premise that A.I. is the be-all and end-all in management - to the point where they just turn the thing on and we're all supposed to do whatever the fucking computer pukes out.

The machine works for me -
not the other way around.


May 14, 2025

Today's Hawk

18 million Americans stand to lose their healthcare coverage if the Republicans get their "One Big Beautiful Bill" passed.
  • lower income Americans
  • kids
  • seniors in need of home care or skilled nursing
  • expecting/delivering moms
18,000,000 Americans -
because Republicans
think billionaires
need more Yacht Money



Make the call
202-224-3121

Mar 27, 2025

Rip Tear Shred Shred



Department of Health and Human Services will lay off 10,000 workers in a major restructuring plan

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a major overhaul, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will lay off 10,000 workers and shut down entire agencies, including ones that oversee billions of dollars in funds for addiction services and community health centers across the country.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized the department he oversees as an inefficient “sprawling bureaucracy” in a video announcing the restructuring Thursday. He faulted the department’s 82,000 workers for a decline in Americans’ health.

“I want to promise you now that we’re going to do more with less,” Kennedy said in the video, posted to social media.

Kennedy acknowledged that it will be a “painful period” for the nation’s top health agencies, which are responsible for monitoring infectious diseases, inspecting foods and hospitals and overseeing health insurance programs for nearly half the country.

Overall, the department will downsize to 62,000 positions — losing 10,000 jobs through layoffs and another 10,000 workers who took early retirement and voluntary separation offers encouraged by President Donald Trump’s administration.

HHS provided on Thursday a breakdown of cuts at the Food and Drug Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services:
  • 3,500 jobs at the FDA, which inspects and sets safety standards for medications, medical devices and foods.
  • 2,400 jobs at the CDC, which monitors for infectious disease outbreaks and works with public health agencies nationwide.
  • 1,200 jobs at the NIH, the world’s leading public health research arm.
  • 300 jobs at CMS, which oversees the Affordable Care Act marketplace, Medicare and Medicaid.
In its statement, HHS said it anticipates the changes will save $1.8 billion per year, but it did not provide a breakdown or any other details about the savings. The department has a $1.7 trillion annual budget, most of which is dedicated to funding Medicare and Medicaid programs used by older, disabled and poor Americans.

That $1.8 billion is a big number - not exactly chump change. But it represents a savings of 0.1% of the HHS annual budget.
So, on the face of it, that money is a drop in the bucket. The real impact - even if we decide to ignore what a truly shitty thing it is to put those 20,000 people out of work - will be felt in the economy, especially as you add it to the possibly trillions of dollars that Elon's merry band of incels is removing from the equation.
Keynesian Economics is a real thing. If you significantly disrupt government spending, you will disrupt your economy. And like the man said: When the US sneezes, the whole world catches cold.

Beyond losing workers, Kennedy said he will shut down entire agencies, some of which were established by Congress decades ago.

Several agencies will be folded into a new Administration for a Healthy America, Kennedy said.

Those include the Health Resources and Services Administration, which oversees and provides funding for hundreds of community health centers around the country, as well as the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which funds clinics and oversees the national 988 hotline. Both agencies pump billions of dollars into on-the-ground work in local communities.

The Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, created by a law signed by then-President George W. Bush and responsible for maintaining the national stockpile that was quickly drained during the COVID-19 pandemic, will be folded into the CDC.

Sep 21, 2023

On Dogs

Again: This is Colorado, where's it's practically illegal to say anything critical about dogs.

It's not so much the dogs I worry about. It's the owners.

And honest, I get it. Here we are in 2023, a time when sometimes it's fashionable to say you care about people, even as your behavior proves otherwise.

But if you can't figure out how to give a fuck about your neighbors, at least show me you give enough of a fuck about your dog to train it properly.

Chart depicts dog breeds that killed ≥13 people during the 13-year period.
33 dog breeds contributed to ≤9 deaths and are excluded from this chart.
9.5% of all fatal attacks involved multiple breeds,
so the total number of deaths attributed to each breed
will always exceed the actual number of deaths.


Boy, 6, attacked by two large dogs near Lakewood park

Diego Manuel Domínguez Inungaray, 6, was attacked by two Malamutes in Lakewood on Aug. 9.


A 6-year-old boy is recovering after he was attacked by two large dogs in Lakewood last month.

LAKEWOOD, Colo. — A 6-year-old boy is recovering after he was attacked by two large dogs in Lakewood last month.

Diego Manuel Inungaray's family said the boy was attacked on Aug. 9 when he and his family were walking to a nearby park.

“It’s been very difficult," said Diego's mother, Perla Inungaray Anderson, in Spanish.

Anderson, who is from Mexico, said she and her two younger kids were in Lakewood visiting family at the time of the incident.

Anderson said Diego was bitten seven times in the face and once in the back. She was not at the scene at the time but rushed to his side as soon as soon as she got the call.

“He looked terrible. He was crying," she said.

Lakewood police said the dogs' owner was walking the two Alaskan Malamutes — 14 and 19 months old — on leashes when the owner lost control of the dogs, and the animals took off after the boy.

The owners were cited for possession of a dangerous animal and leash law violations. The two animals have since been euthanized.


Nearly a month after the attack, Diego still has some pain in his eye but his mother said he has made good progress in his healing journey.

“He has recovered a lot," she said.

The family is now having to stay in Colorado longer than expected to deal with court and Diego's medical needs.

They are unsure how long they'll have to stay and said they are dealing with unexpected financial obstacles.

Despite all of the unknowns, Anderson said it's her faith and her kids that are helping her push through.

A friend of the family has launched a GoFundMe fundraiser to help them in their time of need.

Jun 9, 2023

It Burns

We have no right to be shocked and surprised by any of this. Not when the smart guys have been telling us for decades that this is the kinda shit we can expect.

Yes, we should be moved by the emotional appeal of seeing people's lives disrupted (ie: upended, fucked up completely, snuffed out, whatever - pick one, they're all bad) but we also have to see this as an opportunity to stomp some conservative ass and make the point that Republicans (mostly) are getting people killed because of their foot-dragging at best, and their outright counter-humanity policies at worst.

This is really really bad, you guys.



Satellite pix of Canada on fire.


‘How Could This Happen?’

Canadian Fires Burning Where They Rarely Have Before

Of the more than 400 fires burning in Canada, more than one-third are in Quebec, which has little experience with so many and such large wildfires.


When Liz Gouari was making plans to move from Africa to join her husband in a rural stretch of northern Quebec, he promised her that Canada was a tranquil nation.

But on Wednesday, the couple was among dozens of people sitting in stunned disbelief in an evacuation center after the entire city where they lived was forced to flee from a raging wildfire.

The blaze tore through the forest and bore down on their city, Chibougamau, one of the countless Canadian communities affected by an extraordinary outbreak of forest fires whose smoke has blotted out skies across swaths of North America and forced millions indoors because of hazardous air quality.

Growing up in the Republic of Congo, Ms. Gouari and her husband, Rey Steve Mabiala, said they were familiar with evacuations of all sorts — he had once fled fighting by hiding in a tropical forest — and with how floods and droughts made worse by climate change were causing major displacements on the continent.

“Back home in Africa, there are many climate refugees, but I never thought I would become one in Canada," said Mr. Mabiala, 42, who arrived in Canada in 2018, and was joined last month by Ms. Gouari, 39, after he became a permanent resident and sponsored her admission into the country.

With three months left in Canada’s wildfire season, blazes have already scorched more than 10 times the acres of land burned by this time last year. The size and intensity of the fires are believed to be linked to drought and heat brought on by a changing climate.

Fires are burning in forests in all of Canada’s provinces and territories, except the province of Prince Edward Island and Nunavut, a northern territory that sits above the tree line, where temperatures are too low for trees to survive.

“My wife keeps telling me, ‘But how could this happen? You always promised me that Canada was a peaceful country, but now we’re starting to flee as if we’re back home,’” Mr. Mabiala said, glancing at his wife, who had a blank stare and could only murmur that she was “shocked.”

The outbreak has hit not only the western provinces traditionally prone to wildfires, but also provinces in the east, like Quebec, where it is rare for so many fires to burn simultaneously and whose residents have little experience evacuating from such blazes.

Of the more than 400 fires now burning in Canada, more than one-third are in Quebec, which has already registered its worst wildfire season on record.

Climate Forward There’s an ongoing crisis — and tons of news. Our newsletter keeps you up to date. Get it in your inbox.
“It’s really an exceptional year,” said Josée Poitras, a spokeswoman for Quebec’s wildfire prevention agency.

As even extremely cold regions in Canada become warmer, increasing temperatures and a “vapor-pressure deficit,’’ or a lack of moisture in the air, are making trees drier, said Tanzina Mohsin, a professor of physical and environmental sciences at the University of Toronto.

“We are facing some unprecedented events, including droughts, accelerated fires and heat waves, and there will be more over time, especially forest fires,” Ms. Mohsin said.

The wildfires in Quebec were sparked last week by a single lightning strike near Val-d’Or, a city about 200 miles southwest of Chibougamau, following an unusually dry spring, Ms. Poitras said, adding, “In one day, we got 200 alerts from people reporting that they had seen smoke, and that resulted in more than a hundred fires, which have gradually increased.”

In Chibougamau — a city of 7,500 people about 430 miles north of Montreal by road — city officials issued an evacuation order late Tuesday, only hours after having said that a firewall would contain the encroaching blaze. But with the fires only 15 miles away and picking up speed, residents jumped into vehicles and began heading south.

Many arrived in Roberval, a city about 150 miles southeast of Chibougamau. A drive that usually takes a couple of hours took two to three times longer as a caravan of cars and trailers moved slowly down the highway in the middle of the night.

“I’ve lived in Chibougamau for more than 40 years, and I’ve never experienced a situation like this,” said Francis Côté, 71, who was staying with other evacuees at a sports center in Roberval. “It’s the first time I’ve had to evacuate because of a wildfire.”

It was the first time that all of Chibougamau had to evacuate because of wildfires, though residents in parts of the city had been forced to leave in 2005.

Inside the large sports center where evacuees were sheltering, people sat and slept on cots, with single suitcases next to them. Some had brought along their pets.

The authorities had blocked all roads leading up to Chibougamau and other areas threatened by the wildfires, and it was unclear when residents would be allowed to return or what they would find once they did.

In an odd twist, while smoke from the wildfires was wafting across the East Coast of the United States, there was no smell or visible smoke in Roberval and other areas just south of Chibougamau on Thursday.

A combination of factors, fire officials said, laid the groundwork for the spread of wildfires in the Chibougamau area: freezing rain that weighed down trees and littered the forest floor with broken branches that became tinder; and unusually dry ground because snow melted earlier than usual and there was little rain in the spring.

Built on mining and the logging industry, Chibougamau is one of the few bold names on maps of Quebec’s vast, thinly populated northern regions. For many in Quebec, it is a mysterious place associated with remoteness and extreme cold.

But Chibougamau is also being hit by the effects of global warming. Longtime residents said that the evacuation followed years of change in their community.

Since retiring as a mining worker a decade ago, Mr. Côté has managed an outdoor skating rink in Chibougamau. Fewer months with below freezing temperatures have shortened the skating season, and erratic temperatures have made it more difficult to maintain a clean, smooth ice surface.

“This year, there was a thaw in January,” he said. “It melted, I had to start over, and it took a week to remake the ice.”

“We can really see that it’s global warming that’s impacting us more and more," Mr. Côté added. “Every year, it gets worse.”

When Guy Boisvert, 79, moved to Chibougamau as a child, a white fog blanketed much of the city in winter, as temperatures regularly dropped to minus 45 Fahrenheit. Winters were long, and May brought a lot of showers, making wildfires rare and manageable.

“Sometime we’d see a small wildfire, and it would last a day or two," Mr. Boisvert said.

His wife, Shirley Gallon, 75, who has lived in Chibougamau for 53 years, added, “We never imagined we’d have to evacuate from Chibougamau.”

More recently, because of warming temperatures, the golf season has lengthened in Chibougamau, said Jonathan Mattson, 42, a city councilor and fervent golfer.

A couple years ago, the golf season began starting a full month earlier, in mid-April. Normally, the golf course feels wet.

“But this year, when I walked on the course, it was crispy — very, very dry,’’ Mr. Mattson said.

But perhaps most surprised were newcomers to Chibougamau, like Mr. Mabiala, from the Republic of Congo, who came to work in logging.

Two women from the Philippines, Ruth Cabrera and Anna Huerte, said they had experienced evacuations back home after floods and volcano eruptions.

A familiar dread — of being at the mercy of natural forces beyond their control — returned as the wildfires approached Chibougamau, turning the sky red and yellow.

Ms. Cabrera, 49, who works at a McDonald’s in Chibougamau, and Ms. Huerte, 38, who works in logging, said they did not realize how climate change could upend lives in Canada.

The two women said that their relatives in the Philippines had been astonished to learn about their evacuation.

“They were asking, ‘Oh, is there such a thing in Canada?’ ’’ Ms. Cabrera said.


How to Protect Your Health From Wildfire Smoke

Do masks work?
The best thing to do to prevent breathing in pollutants is to stay indoors. If you have to go outside, put on a mask. But a surgical mask, scarf or bandanna won’t do much to protect you from pollutants. Instead, use a N95 face mask or respirator mask. Cover both your nose and mouth.

How can I keep indoor air clean?
By some estimates, a good air filtration system can cut smoke pollution indoors by about 50 to 80%. If you have central air or an air-conditioning unit, close your windows and switch your system’s filtration settings to recirculate. Portable air purifiers with HEPA filters can work well in smaller spaces. Portable fans and ceiling fans can also help.

Who is most at risk?
All children and adults with respiratory or cardiovascular conditions are among the most vulnerable to toxins in smoke. Older adults and pregnant women are also at higher risk of serious health effects. These people should seek medical assistance if experiencing discomfort or heightened symptoms.

What should I do if I have a headache?
Breathing in wildfire smoke can cause headaches. To ward that off, restrict the amount of time you spend outdoors, and try to optimize the quality of your indoor air. The most effective treatment for headaches can vary from person to person, but over-the-counter medications like Tylenol or Advil can help. Staying hydrated is also critical.

Can I go for a run?
You probably shouldn’t, especially if you suffer from chronic respiratory conditions like asthma. During exercise, we largely breathe through our mouths, which — unlike noses — don’t have a natural filtration system for pollutants. Exercising in a highly polluted environment has been linked to cardiovascular health risks. Smoky conditions can also hinder visibility.

How can I monitor the quality of the air?
Several apps, including AirNow Mobile App, can help you track air quality levels. Home air quality monitors are limited in their abilities and reliability; keep that in mind if you choose to use one.

Oct 15, 2021

This Thing Called Science

Smallpox killed an estimated 300,000,000 people just in the 20th century. A number almost the equivalent of the current total population of USAmerica, Inc.


300,000,000 dead - in just under 80 years.


Did you catch the part about the economics of it?

We put enormous amounts of time, energy and tax money into the effort to eradicate smallpox over a span of decades. And that cost is recouped here in USAmerica Inc every 6 days.

Every.
Six.
Days.

The extremely positive economic benefits of good public health policy should be obvious, and we should be shouting it to the heavens.

And good public health policy comes from good government.

Not more government - not necessarily bigger or smaller - but better.

I want a government that does good work for me at a reasonable price.