Showing posts with label bigotry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bigotry. Show all posts

Aug 3, 2024

Meet The New Trump

Same as the old Trump.



Opinion
Trump’s ‘disciplined’ campaign is unraveling

The out of control Trump — suppressed in recent months with varying degrees of success — is back.


For the last year, we’ve been hearing about the “disciplined,” “competent” and “professional” campaign Donald Trump is running. After his chaotic 2016 and 2020 campaigns, he brought in longtime Republican operatives Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita to lead a “low-drama” operation.

Well, the cat lady is out of the bag.

The trauma caused by the broadly panned choice of Sen. JD Vance as a running mate, combined with President Biden’s withdrawal from the race and the massive outpouring of support for Vice President Harris, have had a terrible effect on Trump: They have caused him to revert to being himself.

Discipline has broken down, and the out-of-control Trump — suppressed in recent months with varying degrees of success — is back on full display.

“Christians, get out and vote just this time,” he told an evangelical audience a week ago. “In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good you’re not going to have to vote.”

His Fox News ally Laura Ingraham tried to tone down this apparent promise by Trump to make this election America’s last. “You will leave office after four years?” she asked him.

“Of course,” Trump replied. “By the way, and I did last time.”

How reassuring.

Vance, for his part, defended his attack on Harris and other people who do not have children as “childless cat ladies,” even as other Vance comments came to light, calling for a “war” against those who say it’s okay not to have children, attacking the “childless cabal” and proposing that people with children should have more votes in elections than the childless, who are “sad, lonely, pathetic.”

‘I do think she can win!’ Impromptu thoughts on Harris doubters.

What to expect when you’re expecting an abortion pill argument
OpinionWhat to expect when you’re expecting an abortion pill argument
Vance stood by “the substance of what I said” about cat ladies. “I’m sorry,” he told interviewer Megyn Kelly. “It is true.”

Campaigning in Reno, Vance expanded his oeuvre of ugliness, invoking the racist “great replacement” conspiracy theory. Harris, he said, “won’t stop until every single illegal immigrant that she let in becomes a voter, handing over control of your country to people who shouldn’t even be here.”

And then came Trump’s tour de force at a gathering of the National Association of Black Journalists, where he repeatedly attacked his questioners and challenged the ethnicity of Harris, the daughter of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father who went to Howard University and joined the Black sorority Alpha Kappa Alpha. “She was always of Indian heritage and she was only promoting Indian heritage,” Trump said on Wednesday. “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago when she happened to turn Black. And now she became a Black person.”

As if that weren’t evidence enough that the Trump campaign has gone off the rails, Trump ally and former adviser Sebastian Gorka could be seen on television calling Harris “a disaster whose only qualification is having a vagina and the right skin color. She’s a DEI hire, right? She’s a woman, she’s colored. Therefore she’s got to be good.”

And there on Fox News was host Jesse Watters, a Trump mouthpiece, telling viewers that he “heard the scientists say the other day that when a man votes for a woman, he actually transitions into a woman.”

Also on that esteemed network, Sen. John Neely Kennedy (R-La.), a frequent Trump surrogate, repeatedly called Harris a “ding dong” while also faulting her for giggling and identifying her as a “loon.” The host, Neil Cavuto, criticized the “bash-a-thon of name-calling at her” as “dumb” and asked, “Do you worry how that comes across?”

Kennedy did not.


The dog whistles are trumpets and fog horns and tornado sirens. The GOP message is clear:
It's bad to be a woman, and it's bad to be black, and it's bad to have anything to do with any kind of immigrant.

Neither was Trump spokesman Steven Cheung concerned about appearances, taking to social media to attack “the pieces of sh-- in the media” and the Harris campaign.

Trump, that paragon of self-control, was on Truth Social this week posting or reposting messages declaring Nancy Pelosi “BAT S--- CRAZY” and an “evil witch”; calling the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol an “inside job” and Election Day 2020 “the real insurrection”; proclaiming himself to be what “God has ordained”; railing against Fox News (running ads from “perverts”); repeating a common QAnon slogan; and lamenting that low fuel prices could help “CRAZY KAMALA HARRIS WIN.” Later in the week, he shared a conspiracy theorist’s bogus claim that “Harris’s own birth certificate [proves] she is lying about being Black” and disparaging the deal that secured the release from Russia of Paul Whelan, Evan Gershkovich, Vladimir Kara-Murza and others: “Our ‘negotiators’ are always an embarrassment to us!”

Above all, he was attending to his top priority: enriching himself. He urged his social media followers to “Get your Bitcoin Sneakers now” and directed them to a website where they could pay up to $499 for a pair of high-tops that say “Trump Crypto President.” The sneakers, along with “Victory Cologne,” coolers and other sneakers commemorating the failed assassination attempt on Trump, are being sold by CIC Ventures LLC — a company owned by Trump. “FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT” announce the $299, shooting-themed sneakers, showing an image of a bloodied (but lean and muscular) Trump raising his fist.

Trump is now using his assassination attempt to make a buck — not for his campaign, not for the family of the man killed in the shooting, but for himself. Meet the new Trump, same as the old Trump.

It’s as though the near-death experience brought out all of Trump’s worst attributes. “They all say, ‘I think he’s changed since two weeks ago. Something affected him,’” Trump told a rally crowd in Minnesota. “No, I haven’t changed. Maybe I’ve gotten worse, actually.”

At his speech to evangelical Christians, he said of Harris, “She doesn’t like Jewish people.” (She is married to one.) He said he “took a bullet for democracy. ... I might have taken it because of their rhetoric.” (The shooter was a registered Republican and a motive hasn’t been identified.) He spoke of “defeating Kamala Harris in a landslade,” mispronouncing both her name and the geological phenomenon, before correcting the latter.

At the Minnesota rally, he bragged about his golf game and revived old attacks against Hunter Biden and a fantasy about mixed martial arts fighters taking on migrants. He also said that he “will not give one penny to any school that has a vaccine mandate,” which would risk reviving the childhood diseases of polio, measles, mumps and chickenpox.

On Ingraham’s show, Trump talked some more about the shooting (“my hand was loaded up with blood”) and said he took it as a good sign that his wife was concerned: “She either likes or loves me, and that’s nice.” He explained his reticence to debate Harris, who he says has “the laugh of a crazy person,” by reasoning that people “already know everything.”

He said the Opening Ceremonies of the Paris Olympics “was a disgrace” for supposedly mocking “The Last Supper.” (Organizers say it was actually a portrayal of the Greek god Dionysus.) And he sought to explain his promise that people won’t have to vote again in four years by saying that “Christians do not vote well. They vote in very small percentages.” Voter turnout among evangelical Christians is exceptionally high.

Trump needs to change the subject — and he’s not getting any help from Vance.

Vance’s explanations of the newly resurfaced comments from his past about “childless sociopaths” (“I’ve got nothing against cats”) haven’t satisfied many inhabitants of Planet Normal, including Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who told CNN’s Manu Raju: “It was offensive to me as a woman. Women make their own determinations as to whether or not they’re going to have children or cats or dogs or how many kids they’re going to have.”

The Ohio senator has also complicated Trump’s attempts to disown Project 2025, the compilation of far-right policy proposals developed by many of his top advisers for a second Trump term. The campaign’s implausible claims that it had “nothing to do with” the project is undermined by the foreword Vance wrote for a new book by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts, the main force behind Project 2025. “In the fights that lay ahead, these ideas are an essential weapon,” Vance wrote.

He is still trying to find his voice on the stump. “If Kamala Harris wants to talk about loyalty, then she should look in the mirror!” Vance recommended in a speech in Nevada. The campaign apparently noticed that this sounded as though he were praising the Democrat, for the next day he revised the line: “If Kamala Harris wants to see the face of disloyalty, she can look in the damn mirror!”

Vance still struggled with the teleprompter and alternated between saying “Nevada” and “Ne-vah-da.” But he handled the Trumpian flourishes with aplomb, riling crowds to boo the media, promising the “largest deportation program in American history” and calling Harris names: “wacky San Francisco liberal,” “wacky, out-of-touch liberal.” He echoed Trump’s falsehoods about rising violent crime under Biden — it has been falling — and asserted that “four years ago, things were going well.” Four years ago, the economy had collapsed and Trump was bungling the pandemic response.

So much dishonesty must have overwhelmed the sound system, for Vance’s mic went out at one of his Nevada events. He tapped it, blew on it, tapped it some more — then waved it in the air and went on talking, inaudibly, until somebody got him a new one.

There were also problems with the sound system at the NABJ conference — and, in retrospect, it would have been better for Trump if the microphones didn’t work at all.

ABC News’s Rachel Scott opened with a reasonable question: asking why Black voters should trust him after his long history of racist remarks and his dining with a white supremacist at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump exploded. “I don’t think I’ve ever been asked a question so — in — in such a horrible manner,” he said, then railing: “fake news ... very rude introduction ... invited me under false pretense ... you were half an hour late ... couldn’t get the equipment working.”

He asserted that he was “the best president for the Black population since Abraham Lincoln,” before railing some more: “thirty-five minutes late ... hostile manner ... a disgrace.”

The questioning moved on to other topics, but Trump was stuck. “A very hostile, nasty tone,” he said, before claiming that migrants are “taking Black jobs.”

“What, exactly, is a ‘Black job,’ sir?” Scott asked.

“A Black job is anybody that has a job,” Trump shot back.

When Fox News’s Harris Faulkner, a sympathetic questioner on the panel, asked about credit-card debt in the Black community, Trump again referred to Scott: “This woman was unable to get the right equipment,” making it “very hard for me to hear you.”

When Faulkner asked whether Vance was ready to assume the presidency, Trump, perhaps not hearing the question, offered no endorsement: “Historically, the vice president, in terms of the election, does not have any impact.”

Trump stumbled in trying to explain whether his call to immunize police from prosecution would extend to the officer who has been charged with murder for killing Sonya Massey, an unarmed Black woman, in her home.

And when Semafor’s Kadia Goba asked a question about his age, Trump went right back to attacking Scott. “Look, if I came onto a stage like this and I got treated so rudely as this woman treated me ...” Trump began.

“Oh my goodness!” interjected a stunned Faulkner.

Trump’s staff then yanked him off the stage, 34 minutes into the scheduled hour-long session.

His campaign issued a statement denouncing “liberal mainstream media malpractice.” Vance labeled the response to Trump’s racial attack on Harris “hysterical.” And Trump, on Truth Social, resumed the assault, saying Harris is a “stone cold phony” in her racial identity. “The questions were Rude and Nasty, often in the form of a statement, but we CRUSHED IT!” Trump announced.

Trump moved on to a friendlier reception at a rally in Pennsylvania — but his words were no less zany. He announced that Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is Jewish, “has become a Palestinian” and “a proud member of Hamas.” The GOP nominee repeated that immigrants are “poisoning our country.” He said a former aide’s account that he “started throwing hamburgers at the wall” at the White House “was all bulls---.” He claimed that his is “the number one selling mug shot in history.” He twice said that the Republican Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, David McCormick, is running to be governor.

And Trump confessed to being disoriented by his new opponent. “Two weeks ago, I was talking about Biden,” he told the crowd. “I didn’t even know her name. Nobody did. Kamala. Hello! Beautiful. I didn’t even know her name.”

Now, he has a chance to meet her. “Well, Donald,” Harris said at one of her own boisterous rallies, “I do hope you’ll reconsider, to meet me on the debate stage. Because, as the saying goes, if you got something to say, say it to my face.”

For the Trump aides trying to impose discipline on their unraveling candidate, the very notion must be terrifying.

Jul 29, 2024

Racist Is As Racist Does


They say "DEI token hire" so they can pretend they're not thinking "ni@@er".

Anybody else think it's a little odd that the Non-Woke, Anti-PC folks are being so woke and PC?

And BTW - are they saying that every women with a job is a DEI case?
  • Every employee with brown skin?
  • Every disabled vet working a job?
  • Every minority in college?
  • Every Latina with her own business?
  • Every woman with her own mortgage?
  • Every Muslim with a car loan?
They might as well be telling us straight out that they think no one is qualified for anything - nobody deserves, or could possibly have earned anything - if they're not a white man.

They get criticized for their racist attitudes, and they defend themselves in the most racist, misogynist, hateful way possible.

When you say ignorant hateful things
about a woman in a position of power
she doesn't hear you.
But your mom hears you
Your sisters hear you
Your aunts and nieces hear you
Your daughter hears you

And it tells them something
about you

Dec 14, 2023

Saw It Coming


The bad guys are out there. The bad guys are always fucking out there.

AT&T's TouchTone phone becomes the dominant telecomm gizmo in the early 70s, and within 3 or 4 years, there's an army of teenagers stealing long distance service, and then eavesdropping on conversations, and 2 or 3 years after that, we've got some serious crooks trying to rob banks with this spiffy new tech shit.

Human wisdom is always at least a generation behind its technological capabilities.


Bigots use AI to make Nazi memes on 4chan. Verified users post them on X.

The ecosystem for explicitly racist and antisemitic memes starts on a fringe site, but ends up in the mainstream through Elon Musk’s platform.


It looks like a poster for a new Pixar movie. But the film’s title is “Dancing Israelis.” Billing the film as “a Mossad/CIA production,” the poster depicts a caricatured stereotype of a dancing Jewish man whose boot is knocking down the World Trade Center towers — a reference to antisemitic 9/11 conspiracy theories.

Posted to X on Oct. 27 by a verified user with about 220,000 followers who bills himself as an “America-first patriot,” the image garnered about 190,000 views, including 8,000 likes and 1,500 reshares. Content moderators at X took no action against the tweet, and the user posted it again on Nov. 16, racking up an additional 194,000 views. Both tweets remained on the site as of Wednesday, even after researchers flagged them as hate posts using the social network’s reporting system.

An antisemitic post on Elon Musk’s X is not exactly news. But new research finds the site has emerged as a conduit to mainstream exposure for a fresh wave of automated hate memes,
generated using cutting-edge AI image tools by trolls on the notorious online forum 4chan. The research by the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), shared with and verified by The Washington Post, finds that a campaign by 4chan members to spread “AI Jew memes” in the wake of the Oct. 7 Hamas attack resulted in 43 different images reaching a combined 2.2 million views on X between Oct. 5 and Nov. 16, according to the site’s publicly displayed metrics.

Examples of widely viewed posts include a depiction of U.S. Army soldiers kneeling before a Jewish man on a throne; Taylor Swift in a Nazi officer’s uniform sliding a Jewish man into an oven; and a Jewish man pulling the strings on a puppet of a Black man. The latter may be a reference to the “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, which was cited as motivation by the 18-year-old white man who slaughtered 10 Black people at a Buffalo, N.Y, grocery store in May 2022, and which Musk seemed to endorse in a tweet last month.

More than half of the posts were made by verified accounts, whose owners pay X a monthly fee for special status and whose posts are prioritized in users’ feeds by the site’s algorithms. The verified user who tweeted the image of U.S. Army soldiers bowing to a Jewish ruler, with a tweet claiming that Jews seek to enslave the world, ran for U.S. Senate in Utah as a Republican in 2018 and has 86,000 followers on X.

The proliferation of machine-generated bigotry, which 4chan users created using AI tools such as Microsoft’s Image Creator, calls into question recent claims by Musk and X CEO Linda Yaccarino that the company is cracking down on antisemitic content amid a pullback by major advertisers. In a Nov. 14 blog post, X said it had expanded its automated moderation of antisemitic content and provided its moderators with “a refresher course on antisemitism.”

But the researchers said that of 66 posts they reported as hate speech on Dec. 7, X appeared to have taken action on just three as of Monday. Two of those three had their visibility limited, while one was taken down. The Post independently verified that the 63 others remained publicly available on X as of Wednesday, without any indication that the company had taken action on them. Most appeared to violate X’s hateful conduct policy.

Several of the same AI-generated images also have been posted to other major platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, YouTube and Facebook, the researchers noted. But the CCDH said it focused on X because the site’s cutbacks on moderation under Musk have made it a particularly hospitable environment for explicitly hateful content to reach a wider audience. The Post’s own review of the 4chan archives suggested that X has been a favored platform for sharing the antisemitic images, though not the only platform.

X’s business is reeling after some of its largest advertisers pulled their ads last month. The backlash came in response to Musk’s antisemitic tweet and a report from another nonprofit, Media Matters for America, that showed posts pushing Nazi propaganda were running alongside major brands’ ads on the site.

Among the companies to pull its spending was Disney, whose brand features prominently in many of the AI-generated hate memes now circulating on X. Speaking at a conference organized by the New York Times last month, Musk unleashed a profane rant against advertisers who paused their spending on X, accusing them of “blackmail” and saying they’re going to “kill the company.” He mentioned Disney’s CEO by name.

This is the growing list of companies pulling ads from X

The most widely shared post in the CCDH’s research was a tweet that read “Pixar’s Nazi Germany,” with a montage of four AI-generated scenes from an imaginary animated movie, depicting smiling Nazis running concentration camps and leading Jewish children and adults into gas chambers (Pixar is owned by Disney). It was one of the few posts in the study that had been labeled by X’s content moderators, with a note that read, “Visibility limited: this Post (sic) may violate X’s rules against Hateful Conduct.” Even so, as of Wednesday, it had been viewed more than half a million times, according to X’s metrics.

Another verified X account has posted dozens of the AI hate memes, including faux Pixar movie posters that feature Adolf Hitler as a protagonist, without any apparent sanction from the platform.

Musk, the world’s richest person, has sued both Media Matters for America and the Center for Countering Digital Hate over their research of hate speech on X. After the latest wave of criticism over antisemitism, Musk announced strict new policies against certain pro-Palestinian slogans. And he visited Israel to declare his support for the country, broadcasting his friendly meeting with the country’s right-wing prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.

Yaccarino, who was appointed CEO by Musk in May, said in a November tweet that X has been “extremely clear about our efforts to combat antisemitism and discrimination.” The company did not respond to an email asking whether the antisemitic AI memes violate its policies.

4chan is an anonymous online messaging board that has long served as a hub for offensive and extremist content. When Musk bought Twitter last fall, 4chan trolls celebrated by flooding the site with racist slurs. Early in October of this year, members of 4chan’s “Politically Incorrect” message board began teaching and encouraging one another to generate racist and antisemitic right-wing memes using AI image tools, as first reported by the tech blog 404 Media.

The 4chan posts described ways to evade measures intended to prevent people from generating offensive content. Those included a “quick method” using Microsoft’s Image Creator, formerly called Bing Image Creator, which is built around OpenAI’s Dall-E 3 software and viewed as having flimsier restrictions on sensitive content.

“If you add words you think will trip the censor, space them out from the part of the prompt you are working on,” one 4chan post advised, describing how to craft text prompts that would yield successful results. “Example: rabbi at the beginning, big nose at the end.”

After the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel, the focus among 4chan users on antisemitic content seemed to sharpen. Numerous “AI Jew memes” threads emerged with various sub-themes, such as the “Second Holocaust edition” and the “Ovens Run All Day edition.”

Microsoft’s director of communications, Caitlin Roulston, said in a statement, “When these reports surface, we take the appropriate steps to address them, as we’ve done in the past. … As with any new technology, some are trying to use it in unintended ways, and any repeated attempts to produce content that goes against our policy guidelines may result in loss of access to the service.” Microsoft did not say how many people have been denied access to its imaging program because they violated its rules.

The ability to generate extremist imagery using digital tools isn’t new. Programs such as Adobe Photoshop have long allowed people to manipulate images without moderating the content they can produce from it.

But the ability to create complex images from scratch in seconds, whether in the form of a Pixar movie poster or a photorealistic war image, with only a few lines of text is different. And the ability of overt hate accounts to be verified and amplified on X has made spreading such messages easier than ever, said Imran Ahmed, CCDH’s CEO. “Clearly the cost of producing and disseminating extremist material has never been lower.”

Sara Aniano, disinformation analyst at the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism, said AI seems to be ushering in “the next phase of meme culture.”

The goal of extremists in sharing AI hate memes to mainstream social media platforms is to “redpill” ordinary people, meaning to lead them down a path of radicalization and conspiracism, Aniano added. “You can always expect this rhetoric to be in fringe spaces. but they love it when it escapes those spaces.”

Not all of the AI memes flourishing on X are antisemitic. Ashlea Simon, chair of the United Kingdom’s far-right Britain First party, has taken to posting apparently AI-generated images that target Muslim migrants, suggesting that they want to rape white women and “replace our peoples.”

The party and some of its leaders, boosted by Donald Trump on Twitter in 2017, had been banned from Twitter for hate speech under the previous ownership. But Musk reinstated them soon after buying the company, then gave the party its gold “official organization” verification label in April.

While Musk has said he’s personally against antisemitism, he has at times defended the presence of antisemitic content on X. “Free speech does at times mean that someone you don’t like is saying something you don’t like,” he said in his conversation with Netanyahu in September. “If you don’t have that, then it’s not free speech.”

Ahmed said the problem is that social media platforms, without careful moderation, tend to amplify extreme and offensive viewpoints, because they treat people’s shocked and outraged responses as a signal of engagement.

“If you’re Jewish, or if you’re Muslim, and every day you open up X and you see new images at the top of your timeline that depict you as a bloodsucking monster, it makes you feel like maybe these platforms, but also society more broadly, might be against you,” he said.

Sep 12, 2015

Today's Maher


Rushdie makes the point that the bigots are always on about how everybody's treating them oh so very badly.  You may notice, btw, that this is the standard play that so many "conservatives" pull all the fucking time.
  • Calling them out for being intolerant means you're being intolerant.
  • Call them out for some racist shit they say, and it means you're the real racist.
  • Tell them to stop using their religious beliefs to rationalize discrimination against LGBT, and you're discriminating against them because of their faith.
  • Smack down a bully, and that just means you're bullying the bully.
But the killer point comes (starting at about 2:00) when Linda Chavez demonstrates perfectly that she's way past her freshness date.  She launches into the same old crap about how (paraphrasing) "people need time to be brought along slowly".  Bullshit.  Comfortable white people said exactly the same thing in the 50s and 60s when asked about Segregation and "Black Rights".  Comfortable owners and managers said exactly the same thing when union organizers were demanding fair labor practices.  

US history is chock full of examples of foot-dragging on issues that basically have centered on getting this country to start living up to the promises it made to itself.  You know - "all men are created equal" and that silly old notion of "a more perfect union" thing.  Go back as far as you feel like going, and you'll find another Linda Chavez telling us that "they want too much too soon - it's all moving too fast - people need time to get used to it - it's all so new, these ideas of equality and fairness".

Stay with this Tim Wise thing til about the 4:00 mark:


If I plug in the word "gay" when I hear "black" or "people of color", and substitute "straight" for "white", suddenly it seems as if some of these concepts are in fact kinda universal - oooh, maybe that's what Mr Jefferson meant by "we hold these truths to be self-evident"(?).

Change can be a scary thing, but we're supposed to treat people right - and we can't afford to continue not treating people right just because it's inconvenient; or because we think we need our families and our friends and our neighbors to agree with us first.

Feb 28, 2014

A Quick Analogy

My god-given right to swing my fist ends where your jaw begins.

In light of recent arguments - aka stupid little tempests in stoopider little teapots fomented by the stoopidest little god-bothering bigots ever - I'm talking about "issues" that shouldn't even enjoy the briefest consideration here in what the grownups like to call the 21st fucking century - here's the thing (via Rude Pundit):
...the moment your worship of whatever invisible sky wizard you choose infringes on his right to exist without the rules of your sky wizard imposed on him is the moment that your religious liberty becomes his oppression.

Feb 26, 2014

Back Pedal

Let the pearl clutching begin!



(hat tip = Facebook buddy KH)

He started way before 1996, but Roger Ailes has been working really hard towards this day for a very long time; his efforts thru DumFux news have been instrumental in the Rise of the Ruling Rubes.

And those Nutty Old Lefties have been trying to warn us about it forever.  So yeah - The Left is right about how The Right is wrong.

What's happening in Arizona and on K Street (and Uganda, btw), is exactly what happens when you unleash the Monsters of the Id* - ie: when you tell the rubes it's OK to be an ignorant superstitious mob, try not to be surprised when the rubes turn out to be an ignorant superstitious mob.

(*watch Forbidden Planet sometime)