Jun 26, 2018
This Just In
...Cult45 is lying.
A coupla versions of Immigration Reform were passed (by the Democrats, if that's how your little ego wants it) - once in 2006, and again in 2013.
Somehow, both times, those rotten old Dems put something together in the Senate that wasn't killed by the filibuster.
Of course, it died in the House both times because the Republican majorities refused to take it up - they wouldn't allow a vote on the Senate versions, and they wouldn't conference with the Senate to try to work things out.
PolitiFact:
The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 passed in the Senate on May 25, 2006, along a 62-36 vote. The bill included provisions to strengthen border security with fencing, vehicle barriers, surveillance technology and more personnel; a new temporary worker visa category; and a path to legal status for immigrants in the country illegally if they met specific criteria.
Then-President George W. Bush commended the Senate "for passing bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform" and said he looked forward to working with both chambers.
But the bill was never taken up by the House. The House in December 2005 passed a separate bill with greater focus on border security and enforcement, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. That proposal narrowed in on employment eligibility verification; immigration fraud; and immigration enforcement authority at state and local levels. It did not include a guest worker program or the legalization of immigrants.
The House passed its own version in 2006, but:
Lawmakers from both chambers never formed a conference committee to iron out the details in both bills and the proposals expired at the end of the 109th Congress.
So then, in 2013:
Backed by Democrats and 14 Republicans, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act passed the Senate on a 68-32 voteon June 27, 2013.
The bill directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit two reports on border security strategy, including one on where fencing, infrastructure and technology should be used; authorized the use of the National Guard to help secure the border; called for an increase in the number of Border Patrol agents at the southern border, and other border security measures.
It also included provisions to allow immigrants in the country illegally to adjust their immigration status, if they met certain criteria.
- but -
...House Republicans again opposed the Senate immigration proposal, arguing that border security needed to be addressed first before legalizing the status of millions of immigrants.
"I’ve made it clear and I’ll make it clear again, the House does not intend to take up the Senate bill," then-House Speaker John Boehner said July 2013. "The House is going to do its own job in developing an immigration bill."
He reiterated his position in November 2013: "The idea that we’re going to take up a 1,300-page bill that no one had ever read, which is what the Senate did, is not going to happen in the House," Boehner said. "And frankly, I’ll make clear we have no intention of ever going to conference on the Senate bill."
So look, guys, if you're going to "reach across the aisle" only intending to grab the Dems by the collar so you can yank them over to your side - and then bitch about how unreasonable they're being when they won't give you exactly what you want - well, you should go fuck yourselves with that one instead.
A coupla versions of Immigration Reform were passed (by the Democrats, if that's how your little ego wants it) - once in 2006, and again in 2013.
Somehow, both times, those rotten old Dems put something together in the Senate that wasn't killed by the filibuster.
Of course, it died in the House both times because the Republican majorities refused to take it up - they wouldn't allow a vote on the Senate versions, and they wouldn't conference with the Senate to try to work things out.
PolitiFact:
The Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2006 passed in the Senate on May 25, 2006, along a 62-36 vote. The bill included provisions to strengthen border security with fencing, vehicle barriers, surveillance technology and more personnel; a new temporary worker visa category; and a path to legal status for immigrants in the country illegally if they met specific criteria.
Then-President George W. Bush commended the Senate "for passing bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform" and said he looked forward to working with both chambers.
But the bill was never taken up by the House. The House in December 2005 passed a separate bill with greater focus on border security and enforcement, the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005. That proposal narrowed in on employment eligibility verification; immigration fraud; and immigration enforcement authority at state and local levels. It did not include a guest worker program or the legalization of immigrants.
The House passed its own version in 2006, but:
Lawmakers from both chambers never formed a conference committee to iron out the details in both bills and the proposals expired at the end of the 109th Congress.
So then, in 2013:
Backed by Democrats and 14 Republicans, the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act passed the Senate on a 68-32 voteon June 27, 2013.
The bill directed the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit two reports on border security strategy, including one on where fencing, infrastructure and technology should be used; authorized the use of the National Guard to help secure the border; called for an increase in the number of Border Patrol agents at the southern border, and other border security measures.
It also included provisions to allow immigrants in the country illegally to adjust their immigration status, if they met certain criteria.
- but -
...House Republicans again opposed the Senate immigration proposal, arguing that border security needed to be addressed first before legalizing the status of millions of immigrants.
"I’ve made it clear and I’ll make it clear again, the House does not intend to take up the Senate bill," then-House Speaker John Boehner said July 2013. "The House is going to do its own job in developing an immigration bill."
He reiterated his position in November 2013: "The idea that we’re going to take up a 1,300-page bill that no one had ever read, which is what the Senate did, is not going to happen in the House," Boehner said. "And frankly, I’ll make clear we have no intention of ever going to conference on the Senate bill."
So look, guys, if you're going to "reach across the aisle" only intending to grab the Dems by the collar so you can yank them over to your side - and then bitch about how unreasonable they're being when they won't give you exactly what you want - well, you should go fuck yourselves with that one instead.
Today's Tweet

The Daddy State needs us to forget easily.
2009-10 saw regular death threats against Congresspeople & our staff - esp people of color. We were spit on, kicked and called N-lovers. NO good journo should compare those tactics then or current bullying by POTUS to a citizen civilly refusing to serve a sr public official. None https://t.co/WhCkYEDl6a— Tom Perriello (@tomperriello) June 26, 2018
Jun 25, 2018
It Occurs To Me
John Oliver - Last Week Tonight, HBO:
Cult45 keeps fucking things up. And not just the stuff they intend to fuck up - ACA, Medicaid, SNAP, National Parks, Water, Air, Food, et cetera, et cetera, et-fucking-cetera.
But every time these bug brains try to do something - when they actually make an attempt to implement policy - they Stooge the fuck out of it.
How long have we heard the Anti-Gubmint Rubes sneering at even the thought of getting decent functionality out of any level of government?
How long have they been harping about how it just takes is a little common sense, and the whole thing will be purring along like a brand new Mix Master?
Well, there they are, kids - the geniuses who think a simple 10-word answer solves everything - fucking up everything they touch.
So, if "all it takes is a little common sense", then how little of it they must have.
Cult45 keeps fucking things up. And not just the stuff they intend to fuck up - ACA, Medicaid, SNAP, National Parks, Water, Air, Food, et cetera, et cetera, et-fucking-cetera.
But every time these bug brains try to do something - when they actually make an attempt to implement policy - they Stooge the fuck out of it.
How long have we heard the Anti-Gubmint Rubes sneering at even the thought of getting decent functionality out of any level of government?
How long have they been harping about how it just takes is a little common sense, and the whole thing will be purring along like a brand new Mix Master?
Well, there they are, kids - the geniuses who think a simple 10-word answer solves everything - fucking up everything they touch.
So, if "all it takes is a little common sense", then how little of it they must have.
Monday Music
Sam Beam and Jesca Hoop:
"Sailor To Siren"
"Know The Wild That Wants You"
"Every Songbird Says"
"Know The Wild That Wants You"
"Every Songbird Says"
Jun 24, 2018
Overheard
Politico carried this tasty morsel:
SEN. MARK WARNER (D-Va.) hosted a dinner Friday night for more than 100 guests at his house on Martha’s Vineyard as part of the DSCC’S annual Majority Trust retreat.
OVERHEARD: Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, joking to the crowd: “If you get me one more glass of wine, I’ll tell you stuff only Bob Mueller and I know. If you think you’ve seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It’s going to be a wild couple of months.”
SEN. MARK WARNER (D-Va.) hosted a dinner Friday night for more than 100 guests at his house on Martha’s Vineyard as part of the DSCC’S annual Majority Trust retreat.
OVERHEARD: Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, joking to the crowd: “If you get me one more glass of wine, I’ll tell you stuff only Bob Mueller and I know. If you think you’ve seen wild stuff so far, buckle up. It’s going to be a wild couple of months.”
Today's Tweet

Irony. Subtlety. Comeuppance. Hypocrisy. Nothing sinks in - these people are impervious to everything that governs the normal functioning of a decent civil society. This is The Banality of Evil.
Go back and tell them you're seeking asylum there. By law they have to let you in, and only a depraved monster devoid of morals would defend turning you away. https://t.co/I7a8j0q8pv— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) June 23, 2018
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





















