I think they are (most of 'em, anyway). Which kind of amazes me, because the school systems (and especially the teachers) don't get much help really. The kids are criticized a lot for being lazy or self-centered or spoiled or distracted or whatever sound bite the politicians need today so they can use it at tonight's fundraiser. The kids' parents get hammered - mostly for the same reason. Everybody gets madder (at each other), the problems don't get addressed, and the schools just continue to circle the drain.
I don't know answers and I don't have solutions, but I know we don't "fix the schools" doing the things we've been trying for the last 20-30 years. And really, guys, we're not gonna get anywhere without putting some serious money into the project. Which is what a lot of people think we've been doing for a lot of years. Unfortunately, we've been pouring all the money into just about everything but the schools.
Here's a pretty fair example, from Minneapolis-St Paul about one of the biggest problems - Standardized Testing and Assessment.
Though the efficacy of standardized testing has been hotly debated for decades, one thing has become crystal clear: It's big business.
In 2002, President George Bush signed the infamous No Child Left Behind Act. While testing around the country had been on the rise for decades, NCLB tripled it.
"The amount of testing that was being done mushroomed," says Kathy Mickey, a senior education analyst at Simba Information. "Every state had new contracts. There was a lot of spending."
The companies that create and score tests saw profits skyrocket. In 2009, K-12 testing was estimated to be a $2.7 billion industry.So, yes - we need reform in our education systems, but we need to be sure we're keeping the ideology separate from the economics. In short, the starting point is this: Stop trying to force-fit the art of teaching into some bullshit standardized business model that really doesn't even exist in the first place.