I've seen and heard some whining going on about what a bitch it'll be for hard-working white-collar Dems who'll have to pony up on the tax raise because they're busy making money north of the magic $250k level, living in a not-very-fancy neighborhood with a coupla kids etc - and now they have to get ready to pay up on Obama's promise to hike taxes, and it's so unfair because gee, $250k just doesn't buy what it used to buy blah blah blah.
Please - get a fuckin' grip. You're supposed to be the "smart ones", remember?
Obama's basic plan is to boost the tax rate on income OVER $250k, which means you'll pay exactly the same rate on the FIRST $250k; paying the higher rate only on the amount you earn after $250K.
You sit down and do just a tiny bit of arithmetic, and wow - look at that - if you're pullin' down $300k, your total rate goes up by about 3/4 of 1%. Think you can handle that one, Mr Super-Genius?
Nov 23, 2012
What (prob'ly) Won't Happen
This is a list of some of the things that aren't going to happen - at least not at the Federal level - because enough of us found the good sense to vote for Obama.
(from Ol' Doc Maddow, via Addicting Info)
(from Ol' Doc Maddow, via Addicting Info)
(1) “We are not going to have a Supreme Court that will overturn Roe vs. Wade. There will be no more Antonin Scalias and Samuel Alitos added to this court.”
(2) “We’re not going to repeal health reform. Nobody’s going to kill Medicare and make old people in this generation — or any other generation — fight it out on the open market to try to get themselves health insurance. We’re not going to do that.”
(3) “We’re not going to give the 20% tax cut to millionaires and billionaires, and expect [cutting] programs like food stamps and kids’ health insurance to cover that tax cut.”
(4) “We’re not going to make you clear it with your boss if you want to get birth control with the insurance plan that you’re on.”
(5) “We are not going to redefine rape.”
(6) “We are not going to amend the constitution to stop gay people from getting married.”
(7) We’re not going to double down on Guantanamo.
(8) “We’re not eliminating the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, or Housing at the Federal level.”
(9) “We are not going to spend two trillion dollars on the military, that the military does not want.”
(10) “We are not scaling back on student loans because the country’s NEW plan is that you should borrow money from your parents.”
(11) “We are not vetoing the Dream Act, we are not ‘self-deporting.’”
(12) “We are not letting Detroit go bankrupt.”
(13) “We are not starting a trade war with China on Inauguration Day in January.”
(14) “We are not going to have — as a president — a man who once led a mob of friends to run down a scared gay kid to hold him down and forcibly cut his hair off with a pair of scissors while that kid cried and screamed for help. (And there was NO apology, not EVER.)”
(15) “We are not going to have a Secretary of State John Bolton. We are not going to bring Dick Cheney back. We are not going to have a foreign policy shop stocked with architects of the Iraq war, we are not going to do it … We had the choice to do that if we wanted to do that, as a country, and we said no, last night, loudly.”
Nov 22, 2012
Nov 21, 2012
Pushing Forward
The point is that The Market works, and when properly guided and regulated, it can do nearly exactly what we need it to do. It's when we leave it completely alone or (more to the obvious) exclusively in the hands of "the elite" that we start to get real problems.
It seems we may be seeing more of a positive shift. Where before, the Big User/Abuser could force us into thinking we only had 2 choices: feeding our families or starving to death while saving a few "insignificant plants and animals".
It's becoming clearer even for the rubes who hear nothing but what's on DumFux News that we have to ensure the overall health of our surroundings if we expect to have any jobs at all; and in fact, we can build an economy (that's almost outsourcing-proof) based on the principles of sustainability that all those "mush-brained hippies" have been trying to get us to understand for a very long time now.
I like thinking we're finally getting to where we can make some of the connections we need to make to change the way we do things - eg: understanding the moral imperative of not making it impossible for somebody else to feed his family while pursuing the means to feed my own.
It seems we may be seeing more of a positive shift. Where before, the Big User/Abuser could force us into thinking we only had 2 choices: feeding our families or starving to death while saving a few "insignificant plants and animals".
It's becoming clearer even for the rubes who hear nothing but what's on DumFux News that we have to ensure the overall health of our surroundings if we expect to have any jobs at all; and in fact, we can build an economy (that's almost outsourcing-proof) based on the principles of sustainability that all those "mush-brained hippies" have been trying to get us to understand for a very long time now.
I like thinking we're finally getting to where we can make some of the connections we need to make to change the way we do things - eg: understanding the moral imperative of not making it impossible for somebody else to feed his family while pursuing the means to feed my own.
Rubio's Dodge
Marco Rubio's interview in GQ Magazine:
Knowing something solid about science - geology, biology, astronomy - has everything to do with how our economy grows. Where do you think the inventions and innovations come from, Marco?
Without a real underpinning in evolutionary science, guys like Salk and Sabin never learn what it takes to kill Polio; we don't get 2nd or 3rd or 4th generation antibiotics, and we don't get anywhere near the gene-based solutions that are coming over the horizon for Alzheimer's or Cancer or Parkinson's or or or.
If we don't put aside this childish wish-think of magic and superstition, we don't figure out the movement of the planets, which means we don't discover anything about gravity, which means we don't put satellites into high-Earth orbit, which means we just sit on our thumbs waiting for the next monster hurricane to wipe out 10-15% of...wait for it...our economy. You lying pandering sack of coprolites.
I've honestly been watching for somebody - anybody - wearing the GOP label to stand up and let me get behind him. We've been told for a coupla years now that Rubio's one of those guys. Not now. Not any more. And not any time in the near future. Turns out Rubio's a fuckin' punchline just like practically all the others.
God, I'm sick o' this shit.
GQ: How old do you think the Earth is?
Marco Rubio: I'm not a scientist, man. I can tell you what recorded history says, I can tell you what the Bible says, but I think that's a dispute amongst theologians and I think it has nothing to do with the gross domestic product or economic growth of the United States. I think the age of the universe has zero to do with how our economy is going to grow. I'm not a scientist. I don't think I'm qualified to answer a question like that. At the end of the day, I think there are multiple theories out there on how the universe was created and I think this is a country where people should have the opportunity to teach them all. I think parents should be able to teach their kids what their faith says, what science says. Whether the Earth was created in 7 days, or 7 actual eras, I'm not sure we'll ever be able to answer that. It's one of the great mysteries.Horse shit.
Knowing something solid about science - geology, biology, astronomy - has everything to do with how our economy grows. Where do you think the inventions and innovations come from, Marco?
Without a real underpinning in evolutionary science, guys like Salk and Sabin never learn what it takes to kill Polio; we don't get 2nd or 3rd or 4th generation antibiotics, and we don't get anywhere near the gene-based solutions that are coming over the horizon for Alzheimer's or Cancer or Parkinson's or or or.
If we don't put aside this childish wish-think of magic and superstition, we don't figure out the movement of the planets, which means we don't discover anything about gravity, which means we don't put satellites into high-Earth orbit, which means we just sit on our thumbs waiting for the next monster hurricane to wipe out 10-15% of...wait for it...our economy. You lying pandering sack of coprolites.
I've honestly been watching for somebody - anybody - wearing the GOP label to stand up and let me get behind him. We've been told for a coupla years now that Rubio's one of those guys. Not now. Not any more. And not any time in the near future. Turns out Rubio's a fuckin' punchline just like practically all the others.
God, I'm sick o' this shit.
New Music
Jon Gomm - Ain't Nobody (Chaka Khan)
(hat tip = Little Green Footballs)
I can't recommend him for his singing voice, but the guy plays the fuck outa that git-fiddle.
(hat tip = Little Green Footballs)
I can't recommend him for his singing voice, but the guy plays the fuck outa that git-fiddle.
Nov 20, 2012
Little Red State Fundy
A golden oldie from driftglass.
I'm not overly fond of the Scary Scenario. Repubs use it all the time to spook people - trying to talk us into believing they've got answers to questions they're usually just yankin' outa their asses. But I guess the difference here is that you can look at something like driftglass's Little Red State Fundy and see some real historical foundations for it.
So there's an element of "both-sides-do-it" - no denying that. I just think it's important to remember always to test for False Equivalence.
I'm not overly fond of the Scary Scenario. Repubs use it all the time to spook people - trying to talk us into believing they've got answers to questions they're usually just yankin' outa their asses. But I guess the difference here is that you can look at something like driftglass's Little Red State Fundy and see some real historical foundations for it.
So there's an element of "both-sides-do-it" - no denying that. I just think it's important to remember always to test for False Equivalence.
How We Do Things
Have you watched "the Sunday shows" lately? Meet The Press and Face The Nation et al? Does anybody watch that junk anymore? I mean anybody who doesn't live and work in DC, or anybody who has any kind of actual life outside of politicking and/or keeping an eye out for the general douchebaggery that politiciking almost always leads to.
I was just wondering because of a piece by Charles Pierce:
I don't watch these shows anymore - haven't for quite a while now. Partly because it's always the same people saying the same things, but mostly it got to where I tho't I was listening to a conversation that had nothing to do with me. Like I'm just the guy serving the coffee at the Hangover-Recovery Brunch the morning after the usual Hearty Party for all these High Holy Pashas.
But what really cemented it for me was the advertising.
I think there's gotta be something else going on. I guess it could be as simple as Power Talking To Power in a closed feedback loop that's so self-reinforcing that's it's almost impossible to break into it - or out of it - all I know is that it feels like I might as well be listening to Baghdad Bob.
I was just wondering because of a piece by Charles Pierce:
But, as they say around the cool kidz table, people like Ms. Dowd set the agenda, and because the whole Susan Rice episode involves intimately the sacramentalized oozing of The Sunday Shows, there was a whole lot of Benghazi-ing goin' on, beginning on Face The Nation where former Prince Henry The Navigator foreign-correspondent Bob Schieffer somehow managed to pry the reclusive Senator McCain out of hiding to appear on the program. McCain promptly proved he is as shallow and muddleheaded as Maureen Dowd.That little snippet makes it seem to me that David Gregory and Bob Schieffer are somehow considered important not so much as journalist watchdogs, but almost as another forum within government; or maybe it's just that The Sunday Shows have become the Public Information Office for Capitol Hill.
I don't watch these shows anymore - haven't for quite a while now. Partly because it's always the same people saying the same things, but mostly it got to where I tho't I was listening to a conversation that had nothing to do with me. Like I'm just the guy serving the coffee at the Hangover-Recovery Brunch the morning after the usual Hearty Party for all these High Holy Pashas.
But what really cemented it for me was the advertising.
BoeingReally? How am I the target demographic for the F-22? Am I supposed to rush right over to my local Amphibious Landing Craft dealer for...what exactly? A test invasion across the neighbor's farm pond? Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over.
General Dynamics
Lockheed Martin
I think there's gotta be something else going on. I guess it could be as simple as Power Talking To Power in a closed feedback loop that's so self-reinforcing that's it's almost impossible to break into it - or out of it - all I know is that it feels like I might as well be listening to Baghdad Bob.
Today's Time Suck
Wonderfully Worthless Websites (hat tip = JG)
Cat Bounce
Bury Me With My Money
Ringing Telephone
Giant Bat Farts
The Last Page
Cat Bounce
Bury Me With My Money
Ringing Telephone
Giant Bat Farts
The Last Page
Nov 19, 2012
Healthy People
A pretty good point (from Wonkette):
This whole stupid argument over Obamacare coming from some of these "conservatives" is just another great example of having people in charge of businesses who really don't understand the first fuckin' thing about business.
And this is what the first thing is: If you don't take care of the people who take care of your customers, you won't have those customers for very long. (and I can't believe anybody would actually have to say that out loud - fuck)
Here is a lesson on capitalism and profitability courtesy four companies that refuse — REFUSE — to make sure that their employees are not handling your food with their tubercular hands.Maybe next time you call ahead for a reservation, you should ask if all the chefs and wait-staffers have seen a doctor lately and if the owner of the joint is willing to guaranty you won't be infected because the pot washer working 29 hours a week at 8 bucks an hour couldn't afford to get a flu shot this year.
This whole stupid argument over Obamacare coming from some of these "conservatives" is just another great example of having people in charge of businesses who really don't understand the first fuckin' thing about business.
And this is what the first thing is: If you don't take care of the people who take care of your customers, you won't have those customers for very long. (and I can't believe anybody would actually have to say that out loud - fuck)
Nov 18, 2012
The Krugman Speaks
I like Paul Krugman's stuff because it all seems to be totally reality-based. He's a "leftie" (whatever that means), but his ideology doesn't get in his way. And since he's engaged in a little thing called "science", it's generally a good thing to let the evidence lead you to a rational conclusion rather than trying to make the numbers fit a particular expectation of how you think the world is supposed to work.
Here's Krugman's whole post from yesterday's NYT:
We'll have to see, but it seems like Republican politics is not changing much. I see the Benghazi crap as their attempt to manufacture a 2nd-term scandal for Obama, and now, with all this bogus posturing about a Fiscal Cliff (more like a short ramp IMHO) and talk of some Grand Bargain, they're trying to hang a major rap on him for a double-dip recession and whatever shitty thing that happens as a result of the sudden drop in Demand that happens when you make big cuts in federal spending. And then, of course, as the 2010 mid-terms roll around, they make all the noise they can possibly make about how all the bad stuff happened on Obama's watch and we have to admit it's all about Obama's failed policy etc etc.
Here's Krugman's whole post from yesterday's NYT:
Transatlantic Divergence
Deadline pressure, so not much blogging this weekend. But pursuing the theme that America is doing the least worst among major economies, here’s a chart I find illuminating:
In the early stages of the crisis, unemployment rose more rapidly in the US than in Europe. This mainly reflected differences in institutions: it’s much easier to fire people in America. From some point in 2010 onward, however, the US situation has gradually improved; initially some of the drop in unemployment was basically people leaving the labor force, but more recently there have been solid though modest gains in the ratio of employment to the relevant population (you have to adjust for aging).
Meanwhile, Europe has gotten much worse; now formally in recession, but the truth is that it has been going downhill all along.
Why the divergence? The obvious answer is that the austerity stuff broke out in 2010, and the austerians took over policy much more completely in Europe than in the United States.That last paragraph is the main point. And I think he's trying to tell us that if we give in to the siren song of Austerity, we just make it harder to get ourselves out of the hole we're in. Also, I've heard others warning us against the effects of Shock Doctrine style economic policy.
We'll have to see, but it seems like Republican politics is not changing much. I see the Benghazi crap as their attempt to manufacture a 2nd-term scandal for Obama, and now, with all this bogus posturing about a Fiscal Cliff (more like a short ramp IMHO) and talk of some Grand Bargain, they're trying to hang a major rap on him for a double-dip recession and whatever shitty thing that happens as a result of the sudden drop in Demand that happens when you make big cuts in federal spending. And then, of course, as the 2010 mid-terms roll around, they make all the noise they can possibly make about how all the bad stuff happened on Obama's watch and we have to admit it's all about Obama's failed policy etc etc.
Nov 17, 2012
50 Shades Of Purple
There are 2 pretty important things that usually get ignored when looking at how the voting splits out in a national election. First is the actual mix of Repub/Dem votes in any given location, and the second is the density of the voter population. So when you just look a the Electoral College map, all you see is big chunks of Red in the middle flanked by big chunks of Blue on the sides.
But when you look at it with a finer granulation, the resolution gets pretty sharp.
(Click on the picture to get a good close look)
But when you look at it with a finer granulation, the resolution gets pretty sharp.
(Click on the picture to get a good close look)
(hat tip = Democratic Underground)
The Anonymous Thing
Lots of speculation and suppositioning about whether or not Anonymous had something to do with stopping a real or imagined attempt by Karl Rove to hack the vote for Romney.
From Wonkette (hard to tell what to think when these guys get goin' on something):
I guess I just have to wonder about something. Let's say Anonymous did have the goods on ol' Karl. The letter seems to indicate they knew an awful lot about the scheme and about how it worked (barn doors etc). If they knew all that, and they had all the evidence of tampering and what could easily be construed as a bunch of people conspiring to commit Wire Fraud, and Election Rigging and a host of other Federal Crimes - why did they just kinda fold the tent and say in effect, "Watch yer ass, fellas cuz next time we'll be on you like the sun covers Dixie". Why go all Batman, thwarting the evil genius, but then, instead of exposing him and delivering him to justice, you pat him on the butt and send him on his way with a warning? I gotta be missing something, or there's a lot more to be found out, but I don't get it - not yet anyway.
From Wonkette (hard to tell what to think when these guys get goin' on something):
Oh cool, Anonymous (we think it is Anonymous?) says Karl Rove was gonna vote fraud all the Machines, and that’s why he was so flabbergasted and refused to believe it when Fox called Ohio for Bamz, but they stopped him from stealing all the Machines by jamming up ORCA, because it was not actually a GOTV system but a “steal the vote” system, but they stopped him, we are pretty sure that is what the following letter, which we guess is from Anonymous probably, says. Seems legit!And here's the letter:
I guess I just have to wonder about something. Let's say Anonymous did have the goods on ol' Karl. The letter seems to indicate they knew an awful lot about the scheme and about how it worked (barn doors etc). If they knew all that, and they had all the evidence of tampering and what could easily be construed as a bunch of people conspiring to commit Wire Fraud, and Election Rigging and a host of other Federal Crimes - why did they just kinda fold the tent and say in effect, "Watch yer ass, fellas cuz next time we'll be on you like the sun covers Dixie". Why go all Batman, thwarting the evil genius, but then, instead of exposing him and delivering him to justice, you pat him on the butt and send him on his way with a warning? I gotta be missing something, or there's a lot more to be found out, but I don't get it - not yet anyway.
A Quick Tho't
I'm hearing way too much whining from people like John Schnatter et al about what difficulties they find themselves in, now that Obummer's been made King of Fuckamericastan. Poor Papa; it's quite possible he'll be unable to afford the upkeep on his richly deserved 40-room house and personal golf course. To that we can add the increasing volume of grumbling from those accursed unions and the under-employed. Here's a shocker: I can't help but feel more inclined toward the people who're actually doing the work.
So any-old-way. I'm coming to realize that the overarching failure of US Government in the last 30 years is that they've done almost literally nothing to protect the American worker's standing as a major contributor to the success of American business - even while they've said almost nothing except how great the American worker is. Really? If you love us so much, why do you treat us like such shit?
Here's CNN/Forbes trying to spin the death of Hostess Brands into a cautionary tale about what happens when "the unions" are all intractable and/or stuck in the 70s or whatever. It tries hard to do the Plenty-Of-Blame-To-Go-Around thing, but it's all about how the bad guy unions wouldn't let poor old Hostesscontinue to poison Americans with food that isn't really food do what a good entrepreneurial business knows it should do in a truly moral free market universe - which of course is ship all the jobs to Mexico blah blah blah. And the kicker is that they use this one case to illustrate how nice it is for a Democrat Hedge Fund guy to try to help out and all, but he's just being too touchy-feely and the grownups need to step in to get it straightened out.
BTW - a brief aside: Papa John's stock has been dropping since his little public tantrum - down something like 9%. So lemme see.I've posted before about an American Working Class that continues to get beat down while the Owner/Investor Class fattens up by getting a shrinking Management Class to work ever harder to maintain the status quo (ie: a continuation of the siphoning upward of as much wealth and power as possible). And my only problem right this very second is that I can't find those posts, so maybe I just dreamed how great a thinker I am - not that my talking about the whole Class-Fuck thing makes me a great thinker in any case; shit, everybody's talked about that one.
9% of a company worth $1.09 Billion is $98,000,000.
Papa John's "Obamacare cost" = about $6,500,000.
Question: Why are stupid people like John Schnatter in charge of these things?
So any-old-way. I'm coming to realize that the overarching failure of US Government in the last 30 years is that they've done almost literally nothing to protect the American worker's standing as a major contributor to the success of American business - even while they've said almost nothing except how great the American worker is. Really? If you love us so much, why do you treat us like such shit?
Here's CNN/Forbes trying to spin the death of Hostess Brands into a cautionary tale about what happens when "the unions" are all intractable and/or stuck in the 70s or whatever. It tries hard to do the Plenty-Of-Blame-To-Go-Around thing, but it's all about how the bad guy unions wouldn't let poor old Hostess
So far, in a courtroom near Manhattan and in a negotiating room in downtown Washington, they haven't come close, although a deal could happen even as you read this. The dramatis personaeare impressive: the Teamsters; two large hedge funds, Silver Point Capital and Monarch Alternative Capital; and the private-equity firm Ripplewood Holdings. In an acrimonious behind-the-scenes war -- refereed by a federal judge -- they wage hostilities over who will get what crumbs from a disintegrating corporate cookie; whether that business can and should be resuscitated; the degree to which fabulous pension plans are anachronistic; whether promises made in collective bargaining ought to be sacrosanct; and just how important it is to save 15,000 union jobs. "There aren't great options here," former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt told Fortune. Gephardt is now a lobbyist and consultant with connections to Hostess and the Teamsters. "People will have to pick the one that's a little bit better."For me, Obama's whole tenure will be a ridiculous success if he does nothing else in the next four years but get our thinking turned around on how to bolster the fortunes of American labor while not flipping over into full-blown Protectionism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)