Showing posts with label bad government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bad government. Show all posts
Dec 3, 2025
Bulwark Takes
You know you're in a really bad place when the most important profit center driving your business - and your business decisions - is the guy monitoring Trump's social media feeds.
Dec 2, 2025
Franklin Fights Back
'Franklin' publisher slams Hegseth for his post of the turtle firing on drug boats
The publisher of the Franklin children's book series has rebuked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth after he posted a meme of the anthropomorphic turtle firing on drug boats.
Hegseth's social media post from Sunday shows the turtle, clad in tactical gear, standing on a helicopter and aiming a machine gun at one of several boats in the water below. It's designed to look like an edition of the children's book, but titled Franklin Targets Narco Terrorists.
"For your Christmas wish list …" Hegseth wrote in the caption, as he faces growing scrutiny over the legality of a set of strikes on a suspected drug boat in the Caribbean in early September.
On Monday, Toronto-based publishing house Kids Can Press released a statement defending Franklin as a "beloved Canadian icon who has inspired generations of children and stands for kindness, empathy and inclusivity."
"We strongly condemn any denigrating, violent or unauthorized use of Franklin's name or image, which directly contradicts these values," it added.
Franklin, who usually wears a red neckerchief and baseball cap (not a ballistic helmet), has delighted kids since the debut of his book series in 1986 — with dozens of titles including Franklin Goes to School and Franklin Wants a Pet — and an animated TV series a decade later.
It is not clear why Hegseth — who is a father and stepfather of seven children — chose the turtle of all characters, though Franklin book covers have inspired some popular parodies in the past.
When asked for comment, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told NPR over email: "We doubt Franklin the Turtle wants to be inclusive of drug cartels… or laud the kindness and empathy of narco-terrorists."
A number of Democrats were quick to condemn the post, as well as the larger controversy behind it.
Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, who has openly sparred with the Pentagon in recent weeks, told reporters that the meme is just one reason why the defense secretary should be fired, calling him "not a serious person."
Congress steps in as questions mount over who authorized a second strike at sea
"He is in the national command authority for nuclear weapons and he's putting out … turtles with rocket-propelled grenades," Kelly said.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, speaking on the floor Monday, called Hegseth a "national embarrassment" and described the Franklin meme as a "sick parody."
"Tweeting memes in the middle of a potential armed conflict is something no serious military leader would ever even think of doing," Schumer added. "The only thing this tweet accomplishes is to remind the whole world that Pete Hegseth is not up to the job."
Questions mount over September incident
Hegseth was already in the hot seat, facing bipartisan scrutiny and questions from Congress about what happened — and whether any war crimes were committed — on Sept. 2, when the U.S. carried out the first of over 20 strikes on alleged drug vessels.
U.S. officials have described their targets as "narcoterrorists" from Latin America, though they have not released information about who was on board those boats or evidence that they were ferrying drugs.
Trump administration officials originally described the first attack as a single strike on a Venezuelan vessel that killed 11 alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang. But in the ensuing weeks, as the U.S. has shared grainy videos of the growing number of strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and Pacific, more questions and revelations emerged about the one that started it.
Last week, the Washington Post reported — and a source confirmed to NPR — that Hegseth gave a spoken directive to kill the surviving occupants of the boat with a second strike. Attacking "wounded, sick or shipwrecked" combatants violates the law of war, according to a Pentagon manual.
Hegseth denied those reports as "fabricated, inflammatory and derogatory," saying U.S. operations in the Caribbean are "lawful under both U.S. and international law … and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command."
But that didn't satisfy lawmakers, several of whom — on both sides of the aisle — raised concerns about a potential war crime. Over the weekend, both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees opened investigations into the incident.
Then, on Monday, the White House confirmed that there had been a second strike, but attributed the directive to another military leader.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Hegseth had authorized Adm. Mitch Bradley — who led Joint Special Operations Command at the time — to conduct the strikes, adding that Bradley "worked well within his authority and the law." Later that day, Hegseth tweeted in "100% support" of Bradley and his combat decisions.
But a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly has since disputed the White House's account, telling NPR's Tom Bowman that Hegseth issued the command for "two strikes to kill" and two additional strikes to "sink the boat."
For his part, President Trump has defended Hegseth but distanced himself from the incident. When asked by reporters on Sunday night whether he would be okay with Hegseth having ordered a second strike, Trump said, "He said he didn't do it, so I don't have to make that decision."
Adm. Bradley, who was promoted to commander of U.S. Special Operations Command a month after the incident, is scheduled to provide a classified briefing to lawmakers on Thursday.
But a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak publicly has since disputed the White House's account, telling NPR's Tom Bowman that Hegseth issued the command for "two strikes to kill" and two additional strikes to "sink the boat."
For his part, President Trump has defended Hegseth but distanced himself from the incident. When asked by reporters on Sunday night whether he would be okay with Hegseth having ordered a second strike, Trump said, "He said he didn't do it, so I don't have to make that decision."
Adm. Bradley, who was promoted to commander of U.S. Special Operations Command a month after the incident, is scheduled to provide a classified briefing to lawmakers on Thursday.
Nov 23, 2025
More Bye Bye
DOGE is dead.
Exclusive: DOGE 'doesn't exist' with eight months left on its charter
"That doesn't exist," Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor told Reuters earlier this month when asked about DOGE's status.
It is no longer a "centralized entity," Kupor added, in the first public comments from the Trump administration on the end of DOGE.
The agency, set up in January, made dramatic forays across Washington in the early months of Trump's second term to rapidly shrink federal agencies, cut their budgets or redirect their work to Trump priorities. The OPM, the federal government's human resources office, has since taken over many of DOGE's functions, according to Kupor and documents reviewed by Reuters.
At least two prominent DOGE employees are now involved with the National Design Studio, a new body created through an executive order signed by Trump in August. That body is headed by Joe Gebbia, co-founder of Airbnb, and Trump's order directed him to beautify government websites.
Gebbia was part of billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE team while DOGE employee Edward Coristine, nicknamed “Big Balls,” encouraged followers on his X account to apply to join.
The fading away of DOGE is in sharp contrast to the government-wide effort over months to draw attention to it, with Trump, his advisers and cabinet secretaries posting about it on social media. Musk, who led DOGE initially, regularly touted its work on his X platform and at one point brandished a chainsaw to advertise his efforts to cut government jobs.
"This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy," Musk said, holding the tool above his head at the Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Maryland, in February.
DOGE claimed to have slashed tens of billions of dollars in expenditures, but it was impossible for outside financial experts to verify that because the unit did not provide detailed public accounting of its work.
"President Trump was given a clear mandate to reduce waste, fraud and abuse across the federal government, and he continues to actively deliver on that commitment," said White House spokeswoman Liz Huston in an email to Reuters.
TRUMP OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN SIGNALING DOGE'S DEMISE
Trump administration officials have not openly said that DOGE no longer exists, even after Musk's public feud with Trump in May. Musk has since left Washington.
Trump and his team have nevertheless signaled its demise in public since this summer, even though the U.S. president signed an executive order earlier in his term decreeing that DOGE would last through July 2026.
In statements to reporters, Trump often talks about DOGE, in the past tense. Acting DOGE Administrator Amy Gleason, whose background is in healthcare tech, formally became an adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy in March, according to a court filing, in addition to her role with DOGE. Her public statements have largely focused on her HHS role.
Republican-led states, including Idaho and Florida, meanwhile are creating local entities similar to DOGE.
A government-wide hiring freeze - another hallmark of DOGE - is also over, Kupor said.
Trump on his first day in office barred federal agencies from bringing on new employees, with exceptions for positions his team deemed necessary to enforce immigration laws and protect public safety. He later said DOGE representatives must approve any other exceptions, adding that agencies should hire "no more than one employee for every four" that depart.
"There is no target around reductions" anymore, Kupor said.
FORMER DOGE EMPLOYEES MOVE ON TO NEW ROLES
Zachary Terrell, part of the DOGE team given access to government health systems in the early days of Trump's second term, is now chief technology officer at the Department of Health and Human Services. Rachel Riley, who had the same access according to court filings, is now chief of the Office of Naval Research, according to the office’s website.
Jeremy Lewin, who helped Musk and the Trump administration dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, now oversees foreign assistance at the State Department, according to the agency's website.
Musk shortly after Trump’s election said he had a mandate to “delete the mountain” of government regulations. He made undoing government regulations and remaking the government with AI two key tenets of DOGE, in addition to eliminating federal government jobs.
The administration is still working toward slashing regulations. The White House budget office has tasked Scott Langmack, who was DOGE’s representative at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, with creating custom AI applications to pore through U.S. regulations and determine which ones to eliminate, according to his LinkedIn profile.
Musk, meanwhile, has reappeared in Washington. This week, he attended a White House dinner for Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
It was never about governing, or making government work better, or making it more cost-effective, or any of that shit. It was about dismantling government. It was about making it worse, so people would be even more dissatisfied, and thus more inclined to go along with the Plutocrats when they propose shit-canning the whole thing and starting over.
1793 can't get here fast enough
- DOGE disbanded eight months ahead of scheduled end in July 2026
- Former DOGE employees take new roles in administration
- Elon Musk initially led DOGE, promoting its work on social media
"That doesn't exist," Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor told Reuters earlier this month when asked about DOGE's status.
It is no longer a "centralized entity," Kupor added, in the first public comments from the Trump administration on the end of DOGE.
The agency, set up in January, made dramatic forays across Washington in the early months of Trump's second term to rapidly shrink federal agencies, cut their budgets or redirect their work to Trump priorities. The OPM, the federal government's human resources office, has since taken over many of DOGE's functions, according to Kupor and documents reviewed by Reuters.
At least two prominent DOGE employees are now involved with the National Design Studio, a new body created through an executive order signed by Trump in August. That body is headed by Joe Gebbia, co-founder of Airbnb, and Trump's order directed him to beautify government websites.
Gebbia was part of billionaire Elon Musk's DOGE team while DOGE employee Edward Coristine, nicknamed “Big Balls,” encouraged followers on his X account to apply to join.
The fading away of DOGE is in sharp contrast to the government-wide effort over months to draw attention to it, with Trump, his advisers and cabinet secretaries posting about it on social media. Musk, who led DOGE initially, regularly touted its work on his X platform and at one point brandished a chainsaw to advertise his efforts to cut government jobs.
"This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy," Musk said, holding the tool above his head at the Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Maryland, in February.
DOGE claimed to have slashed tens of billions of dollars in expenditures, but it was impossible for outside financial experts to verify that because the unit did not provide detailed public accounting of its work.
"President Trump was given a clear mandate to reduce waste, fraud and abuse across the federal government, and he continues to actively deliver on that commitment," said White House spokeswoman Liz Huston in an email to Reuters.
TRUMP OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN SIGNALING DOGE'S DEMISE
Trump administration officials have not openly said that DOGE no longer exists, even after Musk's public feud with Trump in May. Musk has since left Washington.
Trump and his team have nevertheless signaled its demise in public since this summer, even though the U.S. president signed an executive order earlier in his term decreeing that DOGE would last through July 2026.
In statements to reporters, Trump often talks about DOGE, in the past tense. Acting DOGE Administrator Amy Gleason, whose background is in healthcare tech, formally became an adviser to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy in March, according to a court filing, in addition to her role with DOGE. Her public statements have largely focused on her HHS role.
Republican-led states, including Idaho and Florida, meanwhile are creating local entities similar to DOGE.
A government-wide hiring freeze - another hallmark of DOGE - is also over, Kupor said.
Trump on his first day in office barred federal agencies from bringing on new employees, with exceptions for positions his team deemed necessary to enforce immigration laws and protect public safety. He later said DOGE representatives must approve any other exceptions, adding that agencies should hire "no more than one employee for every four" that depart.
"There is no target around reductions" anymore, Kupor said.
FORMER DOGE EMPLOYEES MOVE ON TO NEW ROLES
DOGE staff have also taken on other roles in the administration. Most prominent is Gebbia, whom Trump tasked with improving the “visual presentation” of government websites.
So far, his design studio has launched websites to recruit law enforcement officers to patrol Washington, D.C., and advertise the president's drug pricing program. Gebbia declined an interview with Reuters via a spokesperson.
So far, his design studio has launched websites to recruit law enforcement officers to patrol Washington, D.C., and advertise the president's drug pricing program. Gebbia declined an interview with Reuters via a spokesperson.
Zachary Terrell, part of the DOGE team given access to government health systems in the early days of Trump's second term, is now chief technology officer at the Department of Health and Human Services. Rachel Riley, who had the same access according to court filings, is now chief of the Office of Naval Research, according to the office’s website.
Jeremy Lewin, who helped Musk and the Trump administration dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, now oversees foreign assistance at the State Department, according to the agency's website.
Musk shortly after Trump’s election said he had a mandate to “delete the mountain” of government regulations. He made undoing government regulations and remaking the government with AI two key tenets of DOGE, in addition to eliminating federal government jobs.
The administration is still working toward slashing regulations. The White House budget office has tasked Scott Langmack, who was DOGE’s representative at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, with creating custom AI applications to pore through U.S. regulations and determine which ones to eliminate, according to his LinkedIn profile.
Musk, meanwhile, has reappeared in Washington. This week, he attended a White House dinner for Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
Nov 20, 2025
Another'n
Legislation to restore union rights for hundreds of thousands of federal workers is headed for a House vote.
The bill is opposed by the GOP leaders who control the lower chamber, but a bipartisan group of lawmakers this week very quietly secured the required 218 signatures on a discharge petition to sidestep Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) and force the proposal to the floor.
The breakthrough, which was overshadowed by the week’s intense focus on the Jeffrey Epstein saga, sets the stage for the House to pass legislation returning the collective bargaining rights to federal employees who were stripped of those powers under an executive order signed by President Trump earlier in the year.
Rep. Jared Golden (D-Maine), the lead sponsor of the legislation, said House rules will allow him to call the bill for a vote as early as Dec. 2.
Labor supporters celebrated the development, with some hammering Trump and GOP leaders for attacking working-class people during a period when economic anxieties are already prevalent. They’re eager to highlight the issue with a House vote — and predict it will pass easily on the floor.
“Speaker Johnson is required, pursuant to the discharge petition, to set in motion an up-or-down vote on restoring collective bargaining for hardworking federal employees,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-Calif.) told reporters Wednesday in the Capitol. “And that’s a bipartisan discharge petition that will trigger that vote, so we know the votes exist in the House of Representatives.”
The discharge petition, championed by Golden and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), was introduced in June but was short of the 218 signatures needed to compel consideration of the underlying bill. That changed on Monday, when a pair of New York Republicans — Reps. Nick LaLota and Mike Lawler — endorsed the petition, which had been stuck at 216 signatures for more than two months.
The success of the petition is the latest setback for Trump, Johnson and other GOP leaders, who were forced by another discharge petition to swallow legislation this week forcing the Justice Department to release the full Epstein files — a bill Trump had fervently opposed.
The triumph of the back-to-back petitions has raised questions about Trump’s powers of influence over a House GOP conference he has typically bent to his will. But GOP supporters of the Golden petition said the pushback is not only justified, but constructive.
Rep. Don Bacon (Neb.), one of five GOP lawmakers who endorsed the petition, suggested the rogue Republicans were doing Trump a favor by strengthening the image of the party in the eyes of the labor movement.
“I think we have to force the issue on the president and the leadership. … It’s for the president’s own good,” Bacon said. “For him to rip up an agreement, I think it undermines him in the labor community.”
The legislation might not arrive, however, as a stand-alone bill. That’s because bipartisan negotiators are working separately to install the collective bargaining language in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the annual Pentagon budget package. Because the NDAA is expected to pass through both chambers of Congress next month, Golden and other supporters of his bill see that as the preferred vehicle for securing the restoration of bargaining rights, which might be too controversial on their own to pass through the Senate.
“Right now, the language to restore those rights is in the NDAA, but there’s still negotiations [over] whether it’s going to stay in,” LaLota said. “So those who are righteous about this issue generally don’t want there to be a vote right now [on the Golden bill], and want to preserve the good faith that’s in the negotiations in the NDAA.”
“This is language that is in the NDAA already, that we’re just hoping doesn’t get stripped out.”
If it does get stripped out, it would almost certainly compel Golden to lean on the discharge petition to force a vote on his stand-alone bill.
If GOP leaders try to undermine the discharge petition in a rule, as they did earlier in the year on a successful petition related to proxy voting, Republicans say they’re ready to sink that rule to ensure the bargaining bill reaches the floor. Bacon noted six Republicans had initially blocked a GOP rule in September to leverage win concessions from Republican leaders on tariff policy.
“We let them know that’s not acceptable, so I hope they don’t do that,” Bacon said. “I mean, this is why we have a discharge petition process.”
“There will have to be a vote on it,” he added, “one way or the other way.”
At issue is an executive order, signed by Trump in March, that prohibits collecting bargaining for hundreds of thousands of federal employees across 18 federal agencies, including the departments of State, Defense, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services.
In a fact sheet accompanying the announcement, the White House said certain unions “have declared war on President Trump’s agenda” and argued the change was necessary to protect national security.
“President Trump is taking action to ensure that agencies vital to national security can execute their missions without delay and protect the American people,” the fact sheet reads. “The President needs a responsive and accountable civil service to protect our national security.”
Critics of the executive order have rejected the national security argument, noting that many of the affected federal employees work in industries that directly bolster the armed services and border security.
Others said they simply opposed the idea of scrapping a deal after it had been negotiated.
“When you have a labor agreement and then you just rip it up, it’s not right. And that’s essentially what President Trump did,” Bacon said. “When you sign an agreement, you live by it.”
The final stretch toward 218 signatures was not without some drama.
Lawler was in the hunt to be the 218th lawmaker to endorse the petition, putting it over the top, and had expected a House newcomer, Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.), to provide the 217th signature shortly after she was sworn in on Nov. 12.
Grijalva, however, was at the center of the weeks-long fight to be the 218th signature on the Epstein petition, which was delayed because Johnson refused to swear her in during the long government shutdown. With the government reopened last week, Democratic leaders wanted to keep the focus of Grijalva’s arrival squarely on the Epstein issue, and encouraged her to sign only the Epstein petition on the day she was seated, lest they dilute their own message. The others — including Golden’s petition and one sponsored by Jeffries to extend ObamaCare subsidies — could come later.
The delay drew howls from some of the New York Republicans, who accused Jeffries of delaying the process at the expense of federal workers.
Democrats, however, see the controversy as a victory, since it was not only Lawler who signed Golden’s petition this week, but LaLota as well — an additional Republican likely to help advance the bill if it comes to the floor on its own. That extra cushion could prove crucial, because one of the Democrats on the petition, Rep. Mikie Sherrill (N.J.), is expected to resign from the House on Thursday following her victory this month to become New Jersey’s next governor.
“Importantly, Democrats have ensured that there is now sufficient bipartisan support to withstand any procedural motions that try and kill this successful discharge petition,” Christie Stephenson, a Jeffries spokesperson, said Wednesday.
Nov 12, 2025
Oy
There can be no greater oxymoron than when somebody from the Trump gang calls together a "panel of experts".
"Don't let anybody tell you there's nothing wrong with vaccines, but let's go ahead and remove all mention of known problems that can be caused by pumping your ass full of hormones."
To be clear, my understanding is that hormone replacement isn't known to cause cancer, but an abundance of (eg) estrogen can feed it, causing an existing cancer to grow faster.
That's a simple non-clinician's take on it - kinda like BKjr not having one fucking bit of clinical background, and then providing guidance according to his crew of fellow Dunning-Kruger subjects.
If you have a medical problem, you don't call me, or a plumber, or a junky roids ranger - you call a real live, honest-to-god, licensed practitioner. You call a fucking doctor.
Nov 4, 2025
Cheney's Dead
I won't celebrate the man's death. But I won't mourn his passing either. And I'll never change my opinion that Dick Cheney played a big part in getting us to the shit-point we're at now.
Cheney was a strutting tin-plated martinet - a man of power without conscience. Exactly the wrong kind of guy to be in a position of great consequence in a government where power is supposed to be checked by worthy opposition, and balanced, not just against the letter of the law, but the spirit - what's right and honorable.
Cheney was a strutting tin-plated martinet - a man of power without conscience. Exactly the wrong kind of guy to be in a position of great consequence in a government where power is supposed to be checked by worthy opposition, and balanced, not just against the letter of the law, but the spirit - what's right and honorable.
In the run up to our invasion of Iraq, Cheney's favorite dirty trick was to plant some bullshit on Thursday with his favorite stooge at the New york Times (Judith Miller), and then hit the talk shows that weekend and point to Miller's piece and say, "Look - it's in the Times - they hate me - it must be true."
That guy's fuckery cost us trillions of dollars (that we still haven't paid off), 14,000 dead Americans, plus anywhere from 400,000 to a million dead Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis.
That guy's fuckery cost us trillions of dollars (that we still haven't paid off), 14,000 dead Americans, plus anywhere from 400,000 to a million dead Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis.
But hey - at least Dick Cheney was rewarded handsomely by Haliburton, and never mind about all that torture, and graft, and loss of respect for "America's Values" around the world.
The worst of it is that the asshole got to die peacefully in a soft warm bed, surrounded by caregivers and loving family. Makes me wanna fucking puke.
Dick Cheney, powerful vice president during war on terrorism, dies at 84
After 9/11, he used his role as President George W. Bush’s chief strategist to approve the use of torture and steer U.S. occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Former vice president Dick Cheney, who recast an understudy’s job into an engine of White House power, becoming chief architect of a post-9/11 war on terrorism that involved bypassing restrictions against torture and domestic espionage, died Nov. 3. He was 84.
The cause was complications from pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease, according to a statement from his family. They did not say where he died.
Heart disease had shadowed Mr. Cheney most of his adult life and was a particular concern during his two terms as next-in-line to President George W. Bush. He suffered the first of five heart attacks at 37 and had eight “cardiac events” between the 2000 and 2008 elections.
After the catastrophic attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Mr. Cheney, the nation’s 46th vice president, took on the role of primary strategist in all-out military deployments in Afghanistan and, later, Iraq. As part of this multitrillion-dollar campaign, intelligence officers were dispatched to use “any means at our disposal,” as Mr. Cheney put it, to find and kill terrorists and those who aided them.
Mr. Cheney and his senior lieutenants, Chief of Staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and legal counsel David Addington, worked in strict secrecy to circumvent or reinterpret legal prohibitions against torture, domestic espionage and clandestine imprisonment without charge. Mr. Cheney said in 2008 that “it would have been unethical or immoral for us not to do everything we could in order to protect the nation.” A 9/11-style attack, he said, “wasn’t going to happen again on our watch.”
Before joining Bush’s ticket in 2000, Mr. Cheney amassed unsurpassed credentials, having served as White House chief of staff, defense secretary and minority whip in the U.S. House of Representatives, the second-ranking Republican leadership position in a House then controlled by Democrats.
During Democrat Bill Clinton’s two terms as president, Mr. Cheney presided over Halliburton, a Fortune 500 oil field services company, as chairman and chief executive, joining the ranks of America’s moneyed corporate elite.
Under the far less experienced Bush, Mr. Cheney acquired a portfolio so broad that former vice president Dan Quayle, among other observers, saw him functioning in “a sort of co-presidency.” Mr. Cheney also acquired a reputation as a gifted and sometimes ruthless operator. White House contemporaries said Bush proved to be “the decider,” as he described himself in 2006, but no one did more than Mr. Cheney to set his agenda.
Mr. Cheney’s core beliefs — in unfettered markets and expansive presidential authority — defined Bush’s first-term action plan on taxes, spending, personnel appointments, freedom of information, environmental regulation and ballistic missile defense. He also pushed for an aggressive new stance against Iran, Syria, North Korea and the Palestinian Authority — in addition to shaping the global war on terror.
“He has been pretty damn good at accumulating power, extraordinarily effective and adept at exercising power,” James A. Baker III a former secretary of state and treasury secretary, said of Mr. Cheney in 2007, looking back on more than 30 years of friendship and rivalry.
Mr. Cheney’s role as the Bush administration’s leading advocate of an expansive, aggressive war on terrorism reflected his conviction that the 9/11 attack was a grave threat to the United States and his long-held belief that the power of the presidency was paramount and needed to be reasserted after decades of diminution by Congress and other forces in American society.
But in his later years, in defense of his daughter Liz, then a congresswoman from Wyoming who was one of only two Republicans on a House committee investigating President Donald Trump’s role in fomenting the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Mr. Cheney spoke out against the abuse of presidential power by Trump when he pushed to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
“In our nation’s 246-year history,” Mr. Cheney said in an August 2022 TV ad for his daughter’s reelection campaign, “there has never been an individual who was a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election, using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters rejected him. He is a coward.” Liz Cheney, who had voted to impeach Trump, lost her seat in the Republican primary that month, falling to a Trump-supported opponent.
Then, in 2024, when Trump was his party’s nominee for president for the third consecutive time, Mr. Cheney broke with a lifetime of devotion to a particularly muscular brand of Republican conservatism and announced he would vote for Democrat Kamala Harris “to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution.”
Two decades earlier, in the aftermath of 9/11, Mr. Cheney, without the knowledge of many of Bush’s top advisers, conceived and supervised a wide-ranging new program of warrantless domestic surveillance, code-named Stellar Wind, that circumvented legislative prohibitions and the requirements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Acting through proxies, Mr. Cheney also orchestrated Bush’s decision to strip terrorist suspects of the right under the Geneva Conventions to be protected from “cruel, inhuman or degrading” treatment. He advocated what he called “robust interrogation,” using methods that U.S. allies and previous U.S. governments defined as torture.
To Mr. Cheney, the war on terror was a new kind of conflict demanding new rules appropriate to what he called “the dark side.” Asked once by a radio host whether he could justify “a dunk in the water” to save lives — a reference to waterboarding, a nonlethal technique that simulates the agony of drowning — Mr. Cheney said, “It’s a no-brainer for me.”
“The techniques were reasonable,” he said in 2008. “And I think it produced the desired result, [preventing] further attacks against the homeland for 7½ years.”
Mr. Cheney and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, center, in D.C. with senior staff after the 9/11 attacks. (David Bohrer/U.S. National Archives/Getty Images)
The vice president had concluded that 9/11 revealed a grave new danger. Hostile states armed with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons knew that they could not attack the United States directly without suffering terrible retribution. But the threat of retaliation was less of a deterrent to a non-state actor such as al-Qaeda, the Islamist extremist group that Osama bin Laden founded in 1998 and that carried out the 9/11 attacks. Terrorists might not be able to develop such weapons, but they could deliver them if supplied by a government willing to provide clandestine help.
“The greatest threat we face,” he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” in 2007, was “a 9/11 occurring with a group of terrorists armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities.”
Less than a month after the 9/11 attacks, U.S. forces launched a massive strike on Afghanistan, designed to destroy al-Qaeda and the Taliban government that hosted it. Mr. Cheney became a leading public spokesman for the decision to go to war, and the intervention initially won wide support at home.
Seventeen months later, when U.S. forces invaded Iraq in 2003, Mr. Cheney again led the rhetorical push to justify the war, arguing that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and, as the vice president put it, “long-standing, far-reaching relationships with terrorist organizations.” But this time, the move to military action was far more politically divisive.
Saddam Hussein had rebuilt his nuclear weapons program, Mr. Cheney asserted, and Iraqi intelligence services had working ties to al-Qaeda. In these and other statements, the vice president drew upon U.S. intelligence reports but went well beyond the knowledge and consensus judgments of government analysts.
Dick Cheney, powerful vice president during war on terrorism, dies at 84
After 9/11, he used his role as President George W. Bush’s chief strategist to approve the use of torture and steer U.S. occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Former vice president Dick Cheney, who recast an understudy’s job into an engine of White House power, becoming chief architect of a post-9/11 war on terrorism that involved bypassing restrictions against torture and domestic espionage, died Nov. 3. He was 84.
The cause was complications from pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease, according to a statement from his family. They did not say where he died.
Heart disease had shadowed Mr. Cheney most of his adult life and was a particular concern during his two terms as next-in-line to President George W. Bush. He suffered the first of five heart attacks at 37 and had eight “cardiac events” between the 2000 and 2008 elections.
After the catastrophic attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Mr. Cheney, the nation’s 46th vice president, took on the role of primary strategist in all-out military deployments in Afghanistan and, later, Iraq. As part of this multitrillion-dollar campaign, intelligence officers were dispatched to use “any means at our disposal,” as Mr. Cheney put it, to find and kill terrorists and those who aided them.
Mr. Cheney and his senior lieutenants, Chief of Staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby and legal counsel David Addington, worked in strict secrecy to circumvent or reinterpret legal prohibitions against torture, domestic espionage and clandestine imprisonment without charge. Mr. Cheney said in 2008 that “it would have been unethical or immoral for us not to do everything we could in order to protect the nation.” A 9/11-style attack, he said, “wasn’t going to happen again on our watch.”
Before joining Bush’s ticket in 2000, Mr. Cheney amassed unsurpassed credentials, having served as White House chief of staff, defense secretary and minority whip in the U.S. House of Representatives, the second-ranking Republican leadership position in a House then controlled by Democrats.
During Democrat Bill Clinton’s two terms as president, Mr. Cheney presided over Halliburton, a Fortune 500 oil field services company, as chairman and chief executive, joining the ranks of America’s moneyed corporate elite.
Under the far less experienced Bush, Mr. Cheney acquired a portfolio so broad that former vice president Dan Quayle, among other observers, saw him functioning in “a sort of co-presidency.” Mr. Cheney also acquired a reputation as a gifted and sometimes ruthless operator. White House contemporaries said Bush proved to be “the decider,” as he described himself in 2006, but no one did more than Mr. Cheney to set his agenda.
Mr. Cheney’s core beliefs — in unfettered markets and expansive presidential authority — defined Bush’s first-term action plan on taxes, spending, personnel appointments, freedom of information, environmental regulation and ballistic missile defense. He also pushed for an aggressive new stance against Iran, Syria, North Korea and the Palestinian Authority — in addition to shaping the global war on terror.
“He has been pretty damn good at accumulating power, extraordinarily effective and adept at exercising power,” James A. Baker III a former secretary of state and treasury secretary, said of Mr. Cheney in 2007, looking back on more than 30 years of friendship and rivalry.
Mr. Cheney’s role as the Bush administration’s leading advocate of an expansive, aggressive war on terrorism reflected his conviction that the 9/11 attack was a grave threat to the United States and his long-held belief that the power of the presidency was paramount and needed to be reasserted after decades of diminution by Congress and other forces in American society.
But in his later years, in defense of his daughter Liz, then a congresswoman from Wyoming who was one of only two Republicans on a House committee investigating President Donald Trump’s role in fomenting the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, Mr. Cheney spoke out against the abuse of presidential power by Trump when he pushed to overturn the results of the 2020 election.
“In our nation’s 246-year history,” Mr. Cheney said in an August 2022 TV ad for his daughter’s reelection campaign, “there has never been an individual who was a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election, using lies and violence to keep himself in power after the voters rejected him. He is a coward.” Liz Cheney, who had voted to impeach Trump, lost her seat in the Republican primary that month, falling to a Trump-supported opponent.
Then, in 2024, when Trump was his party’s nominee for president for the third consecutive time, Mr. Cheney broke with a lifetime of devotion to a particularly muscular brand of Republican conservatism and announced he would vote for Democrat Kamala Harris “to put country above partisanship to defend our Constitution.”
Two decades earlier, in the aftermath of 9/11, Mr. Cheney, without the knowledge of many of Bush’s top advisers, conceived and supervised a wide-ranging new program of warrantless domestic surveillance, code-named Stellar Wind, that circumvented legislative prohibitions and the requirements of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.
Acting through proxies, Mr. Cheney also orchestrated Bush’s decision to strip terrorist suspects of the right under the Geneva Conventions to be protected from “cruel, inhuman or degrading” treatment. He advocated what he called “robust interrogation,” using methods that U.S. allies and previous U.S. governments defined as torture.
To Mr. Cheney, the war on terror was a new kind of conflict demanding new rules appropriate to what he called “the dark side.” Asked once by a radio host whether he could justify “a dunk in the water” to save lives — a reference to waterboarding, a nonlethal technique that simulates the agony of drowning — Mr. Cheney said, “It’s a no-brainer for me.”
“The techniques were reasonable,” he said in 2008. “And I think it produced the desired result, [preventing] further attacks against the homeland for 7½ years.”
Mr. Cheney and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, center, in D.C. with senior staff after the 9/11 attacks. (David Bohrer/U.S. National Archives/Getty Images)
The vice president had concluded that 9/11 revealed a grave new danger. Hostile states armed with nuclear, biological or chemical weapons knew that they could not attack the United States directly without suffering terrible retribution. But the threat of retaliation was less of a deterrent to a non-state actor such as al-Qaeda, the Islamist extremist group that Osama bin Laden founded in 1998 and that carried out the 9/11 attacks. Terrorists might not be able to develop such weapons, but they could deliver them if supplied by a government willing to provide clandestine help.
“The greatest threat we face,” he said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” in 2007, was “a 9/11 occurring with a group of terrorists armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities.”
Less than a month after the 9/11 attacks, U.S. forces launched a massive strike on Afghanistan, designed to destroy al-Qaeda and the Taliban government that hosted it. Mr. Cheney became a leading public spokesman for the decision to go to war, and the intervention initially won wide support at home.
Seventeen months later, when U.S. forces invaded Iraq in 2003, Mr. Cheney again led the rhetorical push to justify the war, arguing that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and, as the vice president put it, “long-standing, far-reaching relationships with terrorist organizations.” But this time, the move to military action was far more politically divisive.
Saddam Hussein had rebuilt his nuclear weapons program, Mr. Cheney asserted, and Iraqi intelligence services had working ties to al-Qaeda. In these and other statements, the vice president drew upon U.S. intelligence reports but went well beyond the knowledge and consensus judgments of government analysts.
As war approached, Mr. Cheney professed confidence of an easy victory in Iraq, predicting that U.S. troops “will, in fact, be greeted as liberators.” Later, after years of bloody insurgency, he said the opposition was “in its last throes.”
Time and again, events would prove Mr. Cheney wrong. Iraq had no active programs producing weapons of mass destruction, and postwar analysis found no operational links to al-Qaeda. Saddam Hussein was captured, tried and executed, but the Iraq War continued until 2011, and U.S. troops remained in the country for another decade, seeking to stabilize the country and push back against Islamic State extremists. Nearly 5,000 Americans were killed in the war.
The conflict in Afghanistan continued until 2021, when President Joe Biden withdrew the last U.S. troops, ending a war in which more than 2,300 U.S. service members died and allowing the Taliban to retake control of the country.
Among the sharpest of Mr. Cheney’s critics was Dick Armey (R-Texas), the House majority leader during the run-up to the war.
Armey said Mr. Cheney gave him a private prewar briefing alleging that Iraq was close to building a miniature nuclear warhead and that members of Hussein’s family were working with the architects of the Sept. 11 attack. Armey learned later that neither assertion was supported by U.S. intelligence.
“I felt like I deserved better from Cheney than to be [lied to] by him,” Armey said in a 2008 interview, using a bit of vulgar “Texas vernacular,” as he put it, to describe Mr. Cheney’s conduct.
Mr. Cheney fashioned himself as an anti-politician, frankly indifferent to popular approval. When a “Good Morning America” interviewer noted in 2008 that two-thirds of the public opposed the Iraq War, he replied with a single word: “So?” Asked to elaborate, he said, “You cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the opinion polls.”
Around the midpoint of his presidency, Bush began to see the costs of that approach, according to Bush confidants, including the White House communications director, Dan Bartlett.
A growing backlash against Mr. Cheney’s signature policies, at home and abroad, persuaded the more pragmatic president to trim his course. A policy of strict isolation gave way to diplomatic overtures toward Iran and North Korea, despite the vice president's continuing belief that they were ripe for “regime change.” Bush put an end to waterboarding, secret CIA prisons, and electronic surveillance without authority of Congress and the courts.
By the time he left office, with the lowest approval rating on record for a vice president, Mr. Cheney had confounded old friends and, by some accounts, had spent down a reputation built over decades.
Former national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, who worked closely with him under previous presidents, echoed other longtime colleagues in an interview with the New Yorker. “Dick Cheney, I don’t know anymore,” he said.
Former president Gerald Ford expressed similar sentiments in an interview with The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward. “He was an excellent chief of staff. First class,” Ford said. “But I think Cheney has become much more pugnacious.” He said he agreed with former secretary of state Colin L. Powell’s statement that Mr. Cheney had developed a “fever” about the threat of terrorism and Iraq. “I think that’s probably true,” Ford said.
Mr. Cheney, for his part, told CNN in 2006, “I don’t think I’ve changed any.”
“I think I have been very consistent over time,” he said. “I think, partly, it’s important to remember how significant 9/11 was. … We need to be able to go after and capture or kill those people who are trying to kill Americans.”
He described himself more than once in later years as a “consequential” vice president who took essential steps in the “tough, mean, dirty, nasty business” of protecting the country. History, he said, would credit him and Bush with success.
Although he remained to many Democrats and Republicans alike a symbol of the seemingly endless and eventually highly unpopular wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr. Cheney managed to win back a measure of respect from some Democrats more than a decade later, when he broke with most Republican leaders to condemn Trump’s effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Mr. Cheney had reluctantly endorsed Trump in 2016, after nearly all other Republican candidates for president had dropped out of the race for the nomination. He occasionally criticized Trump’s personality and foreign policy during Trump’s term in the White House. And in 2022 — along with his daughter Liz, who followed in his footsteps as Wyoming’s lone representative in the House — he joined Democrats in a ceremony of remembrance in the House chamber on the anniversary of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
More than two dozen Democrats had moved, unsuccessfully, to impeach Mr. Cheney in 2007 over his role in launching the Iraq War. But now, in the wake of the insurrection, Democrats queued up to shake the hand of the man they had spent years denouncing as a power-mad violator of political and legal norms.
The Cheneys, father and daughter, remained pointedly conservative across a range of issues, but they broke with Trump and his followers, arguing that as president and ex-president, Trump had pushed the party away from policies favoring big-business, internationalism and a muscular military and toward a platform built around fealty to Trump, nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment.
“You can’t overestimate how important it is” to mark the threat to democracy posed by the attack, Mr. Cheney said on the first anniversary of the Jan. 6 assault. “I’m deeply disappointed we don’t have better leadership in the Republican Party to restore the Constitution.”
Mr. Cheney prepares to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee in 1989. (Ron Edmonds/Associated Press)
Hometown hero
Richard Bruce Cheney was born in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Jan. 30, 1941, and was the oldest of three children in a family of Democrats. His father, Richard Herbert Cheney, aloof and laconic, owed his federal job as a soil conservation agent to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. His mother, the former Marjorie Dickey, who had played for a nationally ranked softball team, taught the boy to throw.
When Dick Cheney was 13, the family moved to Casper, Wyoming, then a prosperous town of 17,000.
He headed east five years later as Natrona County High School’s hometown hero, the class president and football captain who had squired the homecoming queen. But his journey was painfully interrupted the next fall, when poor grades cost him his full scholarship to Yale. Mr. Cheney was suspended for a semester and flunked out in his sophomore year.
He drifted back west, finding work as a lineman for a power company. He drank too much and was arrested twice — in 1962, when he was jailed briefly for “operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and drunkenness,” according to the arrest report, and in 1963 for drunken driving.
As commencement speaker at Natrona County High in 2006, Mr. Cheney told the graduating class: “I won’t go into a lot of detail. Let’s just say I did not distinguish myself in those first years after graduation.”
By various accounts, including his own, Mr. Cheney pulled out of his dive when Lynne Vincent, the homecoming queen of his high school romance, informed him that she had no intention of wedding a drunken dropout. An honor student and state baton-twirling champion, she was much the more ambitious of the two. She talked Mr. Cheney back into school, first at Casper’s community college and then at the University of Wyoming in Laramie.
They married in 1964. Mr. Cheney received his degree in 1965, and he and Lynne Cheney had their first child, Elizabeth, in 1966.
With newfound discipline, Mr. Cheney completed a master’s degree in political science at Wyoming and began work toward a doctorate at the University of Wisconsin, where his wife had joined a doctoral program in British literature. He published a well-regarded article in the American Political Science Review, using statistical techniques to analyze House and Senate voting patterns. Later, with Lynne Cheney, he wrote “Kings of the Hill,” a history of influential speakers of the House.
Meanwhile, Mr. Cheney obtained five student and parental draft deferments during the Vietnam War. “I had other priorities in the … ’60s than military service,” he told reporters as he arrived at the Pentagon as defense secretary in 1989.
Lynne and Dick Cheney began imagining an academic life, at a university where they could teach side by side. But one of Mr. Cheney’s professors offered a detour, steering him to a one-year fellowship in the office of Rep. William A. Steiger (R-Wisconsin).
In 1968, Mr. Cheney set aside his dissertation, never to complete it, and brought his family to Washington, where his second daughter, Mary, was born the next year.
It was in 1969 that Mr. Cheney met his most important patron. Donald H. Rumsfeld, freshly appointed to lead President Richard M. Nixon’s anti-poverty office, sought advice from Steiger. The congressman pitched the assignment to his 28-year-old intern. An impressive memo won Mr. Cheney a meeting with Rumsfeld and then a job as his special assistant.
The fast-rising Rumsfeld brought Mr. Cheney along as his right-hand man when he served as White House counselor in 1970 and as director of the Cost of Living Council in 1971. The two men parted for 18 months when Rumsfeld left for Brussels as U.S. ambassador to NATO. Mr. Cheney spent the interlude at Bradley Woods, an investment research firm, advising private investors about Congress.
The Watergate scandal and Nixon’s resignation in August 1974 returned Rumsfeld to the White House as chief of staff to Ford. Once again, Rumsfeld chose Mr. Cheney as his No. 2. In November 1975, Ford dispatched Rumsfeld to the Pentagon as secretary of defense, and Mr. Cheney moved up.
Barely six years had passed since Mr. Cheney’s arrival as an intern in Washington. At 34, he became the youngest-ever White House chief of staff.
“I knew that I could ask Cheney to step into Rumsfeld’s shoes and that the White House would function just as efficiently,” Ford wrote in his memoir.
White House Chief of Staff Donald Rumsfeld, right, and his deputy, Mr. Cheney, meet with journalists at the White House in 1975. (Harvey Georges/AP)
Skillful operative
After the irascible, domineering Rumsfeld, Mr. Cheney won admirers across party lines with his calm competence, willingness to listen and avoidance of the spotlight. He had a dry wit and a Westerner’s distrust of people with airs. Mr. Cheney shunned some of the prerogatives of rank, dialing his own phone calls and driving his 10-year-old Volkswagen to work.
Then, as later, his inscrutable affect and loyalty to a pragmatic boss were mistaken for moderation of outlook.
Memoirs and records made public in the meantime, show him as holding edge-of-the-envelope views on government secrecy and the supremacy of the president over Congress, especially in matters of national security.
Time and again, events would prove Mr. Cheney wrong. Iraq had no active programs producing weapons of mass destruction, and postwar analysis found no operational links to al-Qaeda. Saddam Hussein was captured, tried and executed, but the Iraq War continued until 2011, and U.S. troops remained in the country for another decade, seeking to stabilize the country and push back against Islamic State extremists. Nearly 5,000 Americans were killed in the war.
The conflict in Afghanistan continued until 2021, when President Joe Biden withdrew the last U.S. troops, ending a war in which more than 2,300 U.S. service members died and allowing the Taliban to retake control of the country.
Among the sharpest of Mr. Cheney’s critics was Dick Armey (R-Texas), the House majority leader during the run-up to the war.
Armey said Mr. Cheney gave him a private prewar briefing alleging that Iraq was close to building a miniature nuclear warhead and that members of Hussein’s family were working with the architects of the Sept. 11 attack. Armey learned later that neither assertion was supported by U.S. intelligence.
“I felt like I deserved better from Cheney than to be [lied to] by him,” Armey said in a 2008 interview, using a bit of vulgar “Texas vernacular,” as he put it, to describe Mr. Cheney’s conduct.
Mr. Cheney fashioned himself as an anti-politician, frankly indifferent to popular approval. When a “Good Morning America” interviewer noted in 2008 that two-thirds of the public opposed the Iraq War, he replied with a single word: “So?” Asked to elaborate, he said, “You cannot be blown off course by the fluctuations in the opinion polls.”
Around the midpoint of his presidency, Bush began to see the costs of that approach, according to Bush confidants, including the White House communications director, Dan Bartlett.
A growing backlash against Mr. Cheney’s signature policies, at home and abroad, persuaded the more pragmatic president to trim his course. A policy of strict isolation gave way to diplomatic overtures toward Iran and North Korea, despite the vice president's continuing belief that they were ripe for “regime change.” Bush put an end to waterboarding, secret CIA prisons, and electronic surveillance without authority of Congress and the courts.
By the time he left office, with the lowest approval rating on record for a vice president, Mr. Cheney had confounded old friends and, by some accounts, had spent down a reputation built over decades.
Former national security adviser Brent Scowcroft, who worked closely with him under previous presidents, echoed other longtime colleagues in an interview with the New Yorker. “Dick Cheney, I don’t know anymore,” he said.
Former president Gerald Ford expressed similar sentiments in an interview with The Washington Post’s Bob Woodward. “He was an excellent chief of staff. First class,” Ford said. “But I think Cheney has become much more pugnacious.” He said he agreed with former secretary of state Colin L. Powell’s statement that Mr. Cheney had developed a “fever” about the threat of terrorism and Iraq. “I think that’s probably true,” Ford said.
Mr. Cheney, for his part, told CNN in 2006, “I don’t think I’ve changed any.”
“I think I have been very consistent over time,” he said. “I think, partly, it’s important to remember how significant 9/11 was. … We need to be able to go after and capture or kill those people who are trying to kill Americans.”
He described himself more than once in later years as a “consequential” vice president who took essential steps in the “tough, mean, dirty, nasty business” of protecting the country. History, he said, would credit him and Bush with success.
Although he remained to many Democrats and Republicans alike a symbol of the seemingly endless and eventually highly unpopular wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mr. Cheney managed to win back a measure of respect from some Democrats more than a decade later, when he broke with most Republican leaders to condemn Trump’s effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Mr. Cheney had reluctantly endorsed Trump in 2016, after nearly all other Republican candidates for president had dropped out of the race for the nomination. He occasionally criticized Trump’s personality and foreign policy during Trump’s term in the White House. And in 2022 — along with his daughter Liz, who followed in his footsteps as Wyoming’s lone representative in the House — he joined Democrats in a ceremony of remembrance in the House chamber on the anniversary of the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
More than two dozen Democrats had moved, unsuccessfully, to impeach Mr. Cheney in 2007 over his role in launching the Iraq War. But now, in the wake of the insurrection, Democrats queued up to shake the hand of the man they had spent years denouncing as a power-mad violator of political and legal norms.
The Cheneys, father and daughter, remained pointedly conservative across a range of issues, but they broke with Trump and his followers, arguing that as president and ex-president, Trump had pushed the party away from policies favoring big-business, internationalism and a muscular military and toward a platform built around fealty to Trump, nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment.
“You can’t overestimate how important it is” to mark the threat to democracy posed by the attack, Mr. Cheney said on the first anniversary of the Jan. 6 assault. “I’m deeply disappointed we don’t have better leadership in the Republican Party to restore the Constitution.”
Mr. Cheney prepares to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee in 1989. (Ron Edmonds/Associated Press)
Hometown hero
Richard Bruce Cheney was born in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Jan. 30, 1941, and was the oldest of three children in a family of Democrats. His father, Richard Herbert Cheney, aloof and laconic, owed his federal job as a soil conservation agent to Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal. His mother, the former Marjorie Dickey, who had played for a nationally ranked softball team, taught the boy to throw.
When Dick Cheney was 13, the family moved to Casper, Wyoming, then a prosperous town of 17,000.
He headed east five years later as Natrona County High School’s hometown hero, the class president and football captain who had squired the homecoming queen. But his journey was painfully interrupted the next fall, when poor grades cost him his full scholarship to Yale. Mr. Cheney was suspended for a semester and flunked out in his sophomore year.
He drifted back west, finding work as a lineman for a power company. He drank too much and was arrested twice — in 1962, when he was jailed briefly for “operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and drunkenness,” according to the arrest report, and in 1963 for drunken driving.
As commencement speaker at Natrona County High in 2006, Mr. Cheney told the graduating class: “I won’t go into a lot of detail. Let’s just say I did not distinguish myself in those first years after graduation.”
By various accounts, including his own, Mr. Cheney pulled out of his dive when Lynne Vincent, the homecoming queen of his high school romance, informed him that she had no intention of wedding a drunken dropout. An honor student and state baton-twirling champion, she was much the more ambitious of the two. She talked Mr. Cheney back into school, first at Casper’s community college and then at the University of Wyoming in Laramie.
They married in 1964. Mr. Cheney received his degree in 1965, and he and Lynne Cheney had their first child, Elizabeth, in 1966.
With newfound discipline, Mr. Cheney completed a master’s degree in political science at Wyoming and began work toward a doctorate at the University of Wisconsin, where his wife had joined a doctoral program in British literature. He published a well-regarded article in the American Political Science Review, using statistical techniques to analyze House and Senate voting patterns. Later, with Lynne Cheney, he wrote “Kings of the Hill,” a history of influential speakers of the House.
Meanwhile, Mr. Cheney obtained five student and parental draft deferments during the Vietnam War. “I had other priorities in the … ’60s than military service,” he told reporters as he arrived at the Pentagon as defense secretary in 1989.
Lynne and Dick Cheney began imagining an academic life, at a university where they could teach side by side. But one of Mr. Cheney’s professors offered a detour, steering him to a one-year fellowship in the office of Rep. William A. Steiger (R-Wisconsin).
In 1968, Mr. Cheney set aside his dissertation, never to complete it, and brought his family to Washington, where his second daughter, Mary, was born the next year.
It was in 1969 that Mr. Cheney met his most important patron. Donald H. Rumsfeld, freshly appointed to lead President Richard M. Nixon’s anti-poverty office, sought advice from Steiger. The congressman pitched the assignment to his 28-year-old intern. An impressive memo won Mr. Cheney a meeting with Rumsfeld and then a job as his special assistant.
The fast-rising Rumsfeld brought Mr. Cheney along as his right-hand man when he served as White House counselor in 1970 and as director of the Cost of Living Council in 1971. The two men parted for 18 months when Rumsfeld left for Brussels as U.S. ambassador to NATO. Mr. Cheney spent the interlude at Bradley Woods, an investment research firm, advising private investors about Congress.
The Watergate scandal and Nixon’s resignation in August 1974 returned Rumsfeld to the White House as chief of staff to Ford. Once again, Rumsfeld chose Mr. Cheney as his No. 2. In November 1975, Ford dispatched Rumsfeld to the Pentagon as secretary of defense, and Mr. Cheney moved up.
Barely six years had passed since Mr. Cheney’s arrival as an intern in Washington. At 34, he became the youngest-ever White House chief of staff.
“I knew that I could ask Cheney to step into Rumsfeld’s shoes and that the White House would function just as efficiently,” Ford wrote in his memoir.
White House Chief of Staff Donald Rumsfeld, right, and his deputy, Mr. Cheney, meet with journalists at the White House in 1975. (Harvey Georges/AP)
Skillful operative
After the irascible, domineering Rumsfeld, Mr. Cheney won admirers across party lines with his calm competence, willingness to listen and avoidance of the spotlight. He had a dry wit and a Westerner’s distrust of people with airs. Mr. Cheney shunned some of the prerogatives of rank, dialing his own phone calls and driving his 10-year-old Volkswagen to work.
Then, as later, his inscrutable affect and loyalty to a pragmatic boss were mistaken for moderation of outlook.
Memoirs and records made public in the meantime, show him as holding edge-of-the-envelope views on government secrecy and the supremacy of the president over Congress, especially in matters of national security.
Mr. Cheney believed that Watergate, the fall of Nixon and the Vietnam War had emboldened Congress to overreach, bringing about “the nadir of the modern presidency in terms of authority and legitimacy,” he later said. He tried and failed to persuade Ford to push back against congressional efforts to rein in executive power, including the War Powers Act, the Presidential Records Act, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, expansion of the Freedom of Information Act and legislative restrictions on covert action.
Although subtler than Rumsfeld, Mr. Cheney displayed no less will to power. At an academic conference in 2000, he said he sought control over “things like personnel, process, schedule, speechwriting, legislative relations,” because they allowed a chief of staff to “control and preside over the White House.”
After quiet battles to impose the same discipline on Vice President Nelson A. Rockefeller, a conflict Mr. Cheney later described as “total hostility,” he helped persuade Ford to drop Rockefeller, a former New York governor, as his running mate in 1976.
The prevailing metaphor in the Ford White House was that the president was the hub of the wheel, supported by many spokes. But it was Mr. Cheney who oversaw access to the Oval Office. At Mr. Cheney’s goodbye party, colleague David Gergen wrote in a 2001 memoir, Ford’s top advisers presented Mr. Cheney with “a gnarled bicycle wheel, rim twisted, its spokes broken and bent.”
Jimmy Carter had defeated Ford in 1976, and Mr. Cheney decided to run for Congress two years later. He made deft use of humor after suffering a heart attack during the hotly contested Republican primary campaign, forming a fictitious Cardiacs for Cheney support group and explaining his decision to stay in the race with a two-page letter to Wyoming Republicans.
He won Wyoming’s House seat handily and began another striking ascent in Washington. In the seniority-conscious House, it took him a single term to reach a GOP leadership post. Soft-spoken and collegial, with a disarming habit of listening more than he spoke, Mr. Cheney once again enjoyed a centrist image. His voting record, in fact, was among the most conservative in the House.
Mr. Cheney supported tax cuts and defense spending increases, like nearly all Republicans, but he joined the rightmost wing in voting against a federal holiday honoring the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as well as the Equal Rights Amendment, creation of the Education Department, a ban on armor-piercing bullets, and anti-apartheid sanctions on South Africa. He likewise opposed Head Start for preschool children, the Superfund program for toxic-waste cleanup, the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Endangered Species Act.
Although social “wedge issues” were not his main interest, Mr. Cheney cast votes against affirmative action and for prayer in school. He sought to ban abortion without exception for rape, incest or danger to the mother’s life. But on gay rights, Mr. Cheney departed from orthodox conservative tenets, breaking with Bush in 2004 to endorse the legalization of same-sex marriage. Mr. Cheney’s daughter Mary is married to a woman, Heather Poe.
By 1988, with his uncontested election as House minority whip, Mr. Cheney was positioned to succeed Minority Leader Robert H. Michel of Illinois as head of the Republican caucus. Many colleagues expected to see him become speaker of the House.
But Mr. Cheney’s career took a sudden shift in 1989 when scandal sunk the nomination of former senator John G. Tower (R-Texas) as defense secretary. President George H.W. Bush turned to Mr. Cheney as a no-drama second choice. The Senate confirmed him unanimously.
An old friend and Pentagon aide, David Gribbin, said Mr. Cheney believed in “the demonstrative use of power” — a sharp blow, now and then, to establish his authority.
At the Pentagon, Mr. Cheney gave a blunt public reprimand to the Air Force chief of staff for “freelancing” in budget talks with Congress. He fired the service’s next chief of staff for impolitic remarks about U.S. war plans in Iraq. He canceled the Navy’s top-priority weapons system, the A-12 stealth fighter, after concluding that the admirals in charge had lied about its progress.
In 1989, when it came time to choose a new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mr. Cheney elevated Army Gen. Colin L. Powell over dozens of more senior flag officers, making Powell the first African American to hold the position. The two men proved a potent team, leading the armed forces and the nation through two conflicts — the invasion of Panama and the Persian Gulf War — and a dramatic reduction in forces as the Cold War came to an abrupt halt.
A committed anti-communist, Mr. Cheney was among the leading skeptics of accommodation with the reformist Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev.
Mr. Cheney drew two lasting lessons from Moscow's unraveling, one about U.S. intelligence, the other about regime change in hostile states, said Aaron Friedberg, a foreign policy adviser during Mr. Cheney’s vice-presidential years.
“The collapse of the Soviet Union was really a profound experience,” Friedberg said. “For one thing, the standard experts will tell you things are going to be tomorrow the way they are today.” Even as the Soviet government was collapsing in 1991, Mr. Cheney saw CIA assessments touting the resilience and stability of the regime.
Mr. Cheney came to disdain what Friedberg called “the conventional idea that the way to improve relations with the Soviet Union was by convergence and negotiations.” Mr. Cheney believed that “you had to have a fundamental change of regime” and that trade and diplomacy did little but “delay the collapse of the regime.”
Mr. Cheney and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell talk to reporters during a briefing at the Pentagon in 1990. (Tannen Maury/AP)
Mr. Cheney made his strongest public impression as the unflappable voice of news briefings during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, which was launched to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait. With that mission accomplished, Mr. Cheney supported George H.W. Bush’s decision to leave Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in power. Conquest and occupation of Baghdad would have been “a quagmire,” Mr. Cheney said in 1994, adding: “How many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.”
On other questions, Mr. Cheney pressed unsuccessfully for a harder line. He privately urged Bush to take advantage of Russia’s weakness by recognizing an anti-Moscow Lithuanian government and by inviting former Warsaw Pact nations swiftly into NATO.
He opposed decisions to seek authority from Congress and the U.N. Security Council for the war with Iraq, arguing that the decision to use force rested solely with the commander in chief. Baker and Scowcroft, the secretary of state and national security adviser, respectively, consistently won those debates.
“Sometimes Bush sided with Baker, sometimes he sided with Scowcroft,” said historian Timothy Naftali, who explored the declassified archives. “There was never an instance where Cheney had an outlying opinion and the president sided with Cheney.”
Halliburton bonanza
After Bill Clinton defeated George H.W. Bush in 1992, the Cheney family packed a U-Haul truck and headed back west. Mr. Cheney briefly explored a bid for the GOP presidential nomination in 1996 but found that he lacked stomach for the race. “I didn’t want to do those things I’d have to do to get elected,” he told The Washington Post in 2004.
A more detailed explanation, which Mr. Cheney offered in 1995, provided a glimpse of his lifelong disdain for courting an emotional, ill-informed public. “I don’t tend to pound on the podium and drool,” he said.
Mr. Cheney also worried that a national campaign would focus unwelcome attention on his daughter Mary, who had not yet publicly acknowledged her sexual orientation. Mary came out to her parents during high school and later wrote in a memoir that her father was supportive. “You’re my daughter and I love you and I just want you to be happy,” he told her, according to the book.
Mr. Cheney’s wife, Lynne, far left, and daughters Liz, center, and Mary, attend a speech by Dick Cheney at the American Enterprise Institute in 2009. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
Long after her public coming-out, allusions to Mary’s private life were the only reliable way to pierce Mr. Cheney’s cool. “You’re out of line with that question,” he snapped at CNN’s Wolf Blitzer when the anchorman referred in 2007 to GOP critics of Mary’s decision to raise a child with her partner.
Mr. Cheney spent most of the Clinton years at Halliburton, where he made a series of major acquisitions, most prominently of Dresser Industries for $5.4 billion in 1998. He built the world’s largest oil field services firm, but the Dresser deal proved ruinous because of liabilities that emerged in asbestos lawsuits.
Tens of millions of dollars in compensation brought Mr. Cheney and his family, previously of modest means, to a rarefied plateau that included vacation homes in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and Annapolis. He told friends that he was finished with government.
But then, in early 2000, George W. Bush — the eldest son of George H.W. Bush — locked up the GOP nomination and asked Mr. Cheney to lead the search for a running mate.
Mr. Cheney vetted at least 11 possible vice-presidential candidates, but did not interview any of them before Bush halted the process and chose Mr. Cheney himself.
“If you ever get asked to head up an important search committee,” Mr. Cheney jokingly advised that high school graduation audience in 2006, “say yes.”
President George W. Bush waves to congressional members as Mr. Cheney looks on before Bush’s State of the Union address in 2004. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Bush-Cheney partnership
Before Mr. Cheney accepted Bush’s offer, he negotiated a partnership unique in the history of the White House. After he took office, Quayle paid a visit to give some advice, one vice president to another. Mr. Cheney would spend the bulk of his time, Quayle said, on political and ceremonial chores the president did not want to do.
“You’ll be going to the funerals,” Quayle told Mr. Cheney. “We’ve all done it.”
Mr. Cheney’s mouth curled into his trademark crooked grin. “I have a different understanding with the president,” he said.
By then he had filled the role, in fact if not in name, of transition chief. A strong believer in the idea that “personnel is policy,” Mr. Cheney oversaw nominations for Cabinet and key subcabinet posts, placing allies in senior positions.
Bush agreed that Mr. Cheney was “welcome at every table and at every meeting” and could intercede in “whatever area the vice president feels he wants to be active in,” said Joshua Bolten, who served in the Bush White House as budget director and chief of staff.
Few major decisions, especially in the first term, lacked a Cheney imprimatur, though his fingerprints were seldom apparent. In keeping with his Secret Service code name, Angler, he pursued his objectives obliquely. His own favored metaphor was putting “an oar in the water” on policy choices, steering quietly from astern.
After Mr. Cheney’s long career as a subordinate, the vice presidency now presented what he saw as an obligation to advance his own views. Although he styled himself as only an adviser to Bush, Mr. Cheney noted that he did not serve at the pleasure of the president and had sworn an independent oath of office.
“I’m not a staffer, I’m the vice president, a constitutional officer, elected same as he is,” Mr. Cheney told his authorized biographer, Stephen F. Hayes.
The defining moment for Mr. Cheney came on a sunny September morning in 2001, when hijacked airliners smashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A Secret Service detail, believing the White House to be a target, burst into Mr. Cheney’s office and frog-marched him by his belt and shoulders to an underground bunker.
As Bush flew to safety that morning, from base to base, aboard Air Force One, avoiding an expected follow-on attack, Mr. Cheney took command in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. Although he later claimed prior authority from the president, documentary evidence suggested that Mr. Cheney, not Bush, was the first to authorize Air Force fighters to shoot down a passenger jet believed to be under terrorist control.
“It wasn’t a close call,” Mr. Cheney later said of the order to down the civilian plane, which was not carried out because the plane had already crashed in Pennsylvania. “I think a lot of people emotionally look at that and say … ‘My gosh, you just shot down a planeload of Americans.’ On the other hand, you maybe saved thousands of lives. And so it was a matter that required a decision, that required action. It was the right call.”
Before the day ended, Mr. Cheney turned to Addington, his lawyer, and asked him to start thinking about what extraordinary new powers the president would need to respond to al-Qaeda’s attack.
Libby, Mr. Cheney’s chief of staff, compared the vice president to Winston Churchill, the wartime British prime minister who wrote that “all my past life had been but a preparation for this hour and for this trial.”
The vice president brought Bush a draft of his first military order of the new war, a directive removing terrorist suspects from the jurisdiction of any court, foreign or domestic, and ordering that they be tried — if at all — by newly formed “military commissions.”
The president signed the order without change, though most of his national security team had never seen it.
“What the hell just happened?” Powell asked an aide when he saw a report about the order on CNN.
Alienated allies
Especially in Bush’s second term, a long list of comrades fell out with Mr. Cheney on matters ranging from war and peace to tax and budget policy. Disputes over the environment were particularly puzzling to some Cheney critics. He was an avid outdoorsman, who relaxed, when he could not fish, with catalogues of lures. But his campaign to bypass water-use regulations in the Klamath River valley — an intervention on behalf of drought-stricken Oregon farmers — produced the largest human-caused fish kill on record.
One by one, Cheney adversaries were pushed out of the government or resigned, among them Treasury Secretary Paul H. O’Neill, Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Environmental Protection Agency director Christine Todd Whitman, CIA Director George J. Tenet, Secretary of State Powell and Powell’s deputy, Richard L. Armitage.
But allies also left the administration, most notably his old friend Rumsfeld, whom Bush fired as defense secretary in 2006, and Libby, Mr. Cheney’s chief of staff, who was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice the following year.
Libby’s case arose from the vice president’s ire at a vocal critic of the Iraq War, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, who accused Mr. Cheney of deliberate public deceit. Attempts to discredit Wilson led to the exposure of Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, as a clandestine CIA officer. A federal jury found that Libby lied about his role in the leak. Armitage and longtime Bush adviser Karl Rove acknowledged their participation and avoided perjury charges.
Evidence introduced during Libby’s trial showed that Mr. Cheney was the first of this group to learn of Plame’s CIA employment and the first to suggest that she could be used to discredit her husband. (Plame had suggested Wilson for a diplomatic mission to check on reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium ore from Niger.) Libby testified twice before a grand jury that he could not remember whether Mr. Cheney directed him to leak Plame’s identity to reporters, but he said, “It’s possible.”
“There is a cloud over what the vice president did,” prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said in his summation, suggesting that Libby had obstructed justice to protect his boss.
In a 2004 interview with federal investigators, Mr. Cheney said 72 times that he could not recall details of his role in the Plame matter. Mr. Cheney refused to answer other questions from prosecutors and FBI agents, saying that he was not permitted to divulge details of discussions he’d had with the president.
Bush’s anger about the case, and Mr. Cheney's equally stubborn defense, opened a breach between them. The president commuted Libby’s sentence, in part, but refused Mr. Cheney’s insistent requests for a pardon. In 2009, Mr. Cheney spoke openly of his anger that Bush had failed to correct a “serious miscarriage of justice.”
In 2018, Trump pardoned Libby, saying, “I don’t know Mr. Libby, but for years I have heard that he has been treated unfairly.”
Mr. Cheney’s lowest moment came in February 2006, when he accidentally shot a 78-year-old friend in the face during a quail-hunting expedition. It was a moment of horror that swiftly became a comic metaphor for the ferocious image Mr. Cheney sometimes cultivated for himself. (He dressed his black Labrador as Darth Vader one Halloween.)
The political damage was heightened by the habitual secrecy that kept the incident under wraps for a full day, and by victim Harry Whittington’s disconcerting apology for embarrassing the vice president.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, left, shakes hands with Mr. Cheney during an event at the Pentagon in December 2006. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
Loss of influence
The Cheney imprint on law and policy, which peaked in the first term, had faded considerably by the time he and Bush left office. One episode, above all others, cooled their relationship.
In 2004, when senior government lawyers rose up in protest against the domestic surveillance program that Mr. Cheney had advocated, Bush did not learn of the dispute until the top leadership of the FBI and main Justice Department reached the brink of mass resignation.
Mr. Cheney’s unyielding drive could pose serious political problems for the president, aides said. Bush also grew prickly about accounts that cast Mr. Cheney as the administration’s puppet master.
“I think I’m wiser than that — than to be pigeonholed or, you know, get cornered by a wily adviser,” Bush replied in 2007 when a Fox News reporter asked about perceptions that Mr. Cheney ran the show. “The thing about Vice President Cheney is, he is predictable in many ways, because he brings a set of beliefs. And, uh, they’re firm beliefs.”
Bush aides argued that the president, before making major decisions, had to weigh a far broader array of concerns than those of special interest to Mr. Cheney.
Mr. Cheney “thinks of the national security interest or the prerogatives of the executive,” said Bartlett, a Bush confidant since Texas days. “The president has other considerations he has to take into account. The political fallout of certain reactions — he’s just going to calculate [differently] than Cheney does. He grew accustomed to that.”
Soon after leaving office, Mr. Cheney began work on a memoir, which he wrote with his daughter Liz and which was published in 2012 as “In My Time.” In addition to his wife and two daughters, survivors include seven grandchildren.
Despite an ailing heart and reduced mobility, the former vice president retained a prodigious capacity for work. He rose early and read voraciously. After suffering his fifth heart attack in 2010, he had a heart transplant in 2012. He wrote a book, “Heart: An American Medical Odyssey” (2013) with his cardiologist, Jonathan Reiner, and Liz Cheney.
He allowed himself indulgences, such as a morning drive to Starbucks and attendance at his grandchildren’s soccer and softball games. Butin his later years, much of his time was passed above the garage at his new house in McLean, Virginia, filling legal pads with his slashing longhand. In 2015, he published “Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America,” also written with his daughter Liz.
“When the president made decisions that I didn’t agree with, I still supported him and didn’t go out and undercut him,” Mr. Cheney told his biographer Hayes. “Now we’re talking about after we’ve left office. I have strong feelings about what happened. … And I don’t have any reason not to forthrightly express those views.”
Although subtler than Rumsfeld, Mr. Cheney displayed no less will to power. At an academic conference in 2000, he said he sought control over “things like personnel, process, schedule, speechwriting, legislative relations,” because they allowed a chief of staff to “control and preside over the White House.”
After quiet battles to impose the same discipline on Vice President Nelson A. Rockefeller, a conflict Mr. Cheney later described as “total hostility,” he helped persuade Ford to drop Rockefeller, a former New York governor, as his running mate in 1976.
The prevailing metaphor in the Ford White House was that the president was the hub of the wheel, supported by many spokes. But it was Mr. Cheney who oversaw access to the Oval Office. At Mr. Cheney’s goodbye party, colleague David Gergen wrote in a 2001 memoir, Ford’s top advisers presented Mr. Cheney with “a gnarled bicycle wheel, rim twisted, its spokes broken and bent.”
Jimmy Carter had defeated Ford in 1976, and Mr. Cheney decided to run for Congress two years later. He made deft use of humor after suffering a heart attack during the hotly contested Republican primary campaign, forming a fictitious Cardiacs for Cheney support group and explaining his decision to stay in the race with a two-page letter to Wyoming Republicans.
He won Wyoming’s House seat handily and began another striking ascent in Washington. In the seniority-conscious House, it took him a single term to reach a GOP leadership post. Soft-spoken and collegial, with a disarming habit of listening more than he spoke, Mr. Cheney once again enjoyed a centrist image. His voting record, in fact, was among the most conservative in the House.
Mr. Cheney supported tax cuts and defense spending increases, like nearly all Republicans, but he joined the rightmost wing in voting against a federal holiday honoring the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. as well as the Equal Rights Amendment, creation of the Education Department, a ban on armor-piercing bullets, and anti-apartheid sanctions on South Africa. He likewise opposed Head Start for preschool children, the Superfund program for toxic-waste cleanup, the Clean Water Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Endangered Species Act.
Although social “wedge issues” were not his main interest, Mr. Cheney cast votes against affirmative action and for prayer in school. He sought to ban abortion without exception for rape, incest or danger to the mother’s life. But on gay rights, Mr. Cheney departed from orthodox conservative tenets, breaking with Bush in 2004 to endorse the legalization of same-sex marriage. Mr. Cheney’s daughter Mary is married to a woman, Heather Poe.
By 1988, with his uncontested election as House minority whip, Mr. Cheney was positioned to succeed Minority Leader Robert H. Michel of Illinois as head of the Republican caucus. Many colleagues expected to see him become speaker of the House.
But Mr. Cheney’s career took a sudden shift in 1989 when scandal sunk the nomination of former senator John G. Tower (R-Texas) as defense secretary. President George H.W. Bush turned to Mr. Cheney as a no-drama second choice. The Senate confirmed him unanimously.
An old friend and Pentagon aide, David Gribbin, said Mr. Cheney believed in “the demonstrative use of power” — a sharp blow, now and then, to establish his authority.
At the Pentagon, Mr. Cheney gave a blunt public reprimand to the Air Force chief of staff for “freelancing” in budget talks with Congress. He fired the service’s next chief of staff for impolitic remarks about U.S. war plans in Iraq. He canceled the Navy’s top-priority weapons system, the A-12 stealth fighter, after concluding that the admirals in charge had lied about its progress.
In 1989, when it came time to choose a new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mr. Cheney elevated Army Gen. Colin L. Powell over dozens of more senior flag officers, making Powell the first African American to hold the position. The two men proved a potent team, leading the armed forces and the nation through two conflicts — the invasion of Panama and the Persian Gulf War — and a dramatic reduction in forces as the Cold War came to an abrupt halt.
A committed anti-communist, Mr. Cheney was among the leading skeptics of accommodation with the reformist Soviet leader Mikhail S. Gorbachev.
Mr. Cheney drew two lasting lessons from Moscow's unraveling, one about U.S. intelligence, the other about regime change in hostile states, said Aaron Friedberg, a foreign policy adviser during Mr. Cheney’s vice-presidential years.
“The collapse of the Soviet Union was really a profound experience,” Friedberg said. “For one thing, the standard experts will tell you things are going to be tomorrow the way they are today.” Even as the Soviet government was collapsing in 1991, Mr. Cheney saw CIA assessments touting the resilience and stability of the regime.
Mr. Cheney came to disdain what Friedberg called “the conventional idea that the way to improve relations with the Soviet Union was by convergence and negotiations.” Mr. Cheney believed that “you had to have a fundamental change of regime” and that trade and diplomacy did little but “delay the collapse of the regime.”
Mr. Cheney and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell talk to reporters during a briefing at the Pentagon in 1990. (Tannen Maury/AP)
Mr. Cheney made his strongest public impression as the unflappable voice of news briefings during the 1991 Persian Gulf War, which was launched to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait. With that mission accomplished, Mr. Cheney supported George H.W. Bush’s decision to leave Iraqi President Saddam Hussein in power. Conquest and occupation of Baghdad would have been “a quagmire,” Mr. Cheney said in 1994, adding: “How many additional dead Americans is Saddam worth? Our judgment was, not very many, and I think we got it right.”
On other questions, Mr. Cheney pressed unsuccessfully for a harder line. He privately urged Bush to take advantage of Russia’s weakness by recognizing an anti-Moscow Lithuanian government and by inviting former Warsaw Pact nations swiftly into NATO.
He opposed decisions to seek authority from Congress and the U.N. Security Council for the war with Iraq, arguing that the decision to use force rested solely with the commander in chief. Baker and Scowcroft, the secretary of state and national security adviser, respectively, consistently won those debates.
“Sometimes Bush sided with Baker, sometimes he sided with Scowcroft,” said historian Timothy Naftali, who explored the declassified archives. “There was never an instance where Cheney had an outlying opinion and the president sided with Cheney.”
Halliburton bonanza
After Bill Clinton defeated George H.W. Bush in 1992, the Cheney family packed a U-Haul truck and headed back west. Mr. Cheney briefly explored a bid for the GOP presidential nomination in 1996 but found that he lacked stomach for the race. “I didn’t want to do those things I’d have to do to get elected,” he told The Washington Post in 2004.
A more detailed explanation, which Mr. Cheney offered in 1995, provided a glimpse of his lifelong disdain for courting an emotional, ill-informed public. “I don’t tend to pound on the podium and drool,” he said.
Mr. Cheney also worried that a national campaign would focus unwelcome attention on his daughter Mary, who had not yet publicly acknowledged her sexual orientation. Mary came out to her parents during high school and later wrote in a memoir that her father was supportive. “You’re my daughter and I love you and I just want you to be happy,” he told her, according to the book.
Mr. Cheney’s wife, Lynne, far left, and daughters Liz, center, and Mary, attend a speech by Dick Cheney at the American Enterprise Institute in 2009. (Melina Mara/The Washington Post)
Long after her public coming-out, allusions to Mary’s private life were the only reliable way to pierce Mr. Cheney’s cool. “You’re out of line with that question,” he snapped at CNN’s Wolf Blitzer when the anchorman referred in 2007 to GOP critics of Mary’s decision to raise a child with her partner.
Mr. Cheney spent most of the Clinton years at Halliburton, where he made a series of major acquisitions, most prominently of Dresser Industries for $5.4 billion in 1998. He built the world’s largest oil field services firm, but the Dresser deal proved ruinous because of liabilities that emerged in asbestos lawsuits.
Tens of millions of dollars in compensation brought Mr. Cheney and his family, previously of modest means, to a rarefied plateau that included vacation homes in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and Annapolis. He told friends that he was finished with government.
But then, in early 2000, George W. Bush — the eldest son of George H.W. Bush — locked up the GOP nomination and asked Mr. Cheney to lead the search for a running mate.
Mr. Cheney vetted at least 11 possible vice-presidential candidates, but did not interview any of them before Bush halted the process and chose Mr. Cheney himself.
“If you ever get asked to head up an important search committee,” Mr. Cheney jokingly advised that high school graduation audience in 2006, “say yes.”
President George W. Bush waves to congressional members as Mr. Cheney looks on before Bush’s State of the Union address in 2004. (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Bush-Cheney partnership
Before Mr. Cheney accepted Bush’s offer, he negotiated a partnership unique in the history of the White House. After he took office, Quayle paid a visit to give some advice, one vice president to another. Mr. Cheney would spend the bulk of his time, Quayle said, on political and ceremonial chores the president did not want to do.
“You’ll be going to the funerals,” Quayle told Mr. Cheney. “We’ve all done it.”
Mr. Cheney’s mouth curled into his trademark crooked grin. “I have a different understanding with the president,” he said.
By then he had filled the role, in fact if not in name, of transition chief. A strong believer in the idea that “personnel is policy,” Mr. Cheney oversaw nominations for Cabinet and key subcabinet posts, placing allies in senior positions.
Bush agreed that Mr. Cheney was “welcome at every table and at every meeting” and could intercede in “whatever area the vice president feels he wants to be active in,” said Joshua Bolten, who served in the Bush White House as budget director and chief of staff.
Few major decisions, especially in the first term, lacked a Cheney imprimatur, though his fingerprints were seldom apparent. In keeping with his Secret Service code name, Angler, he pursued his objectives obliquely. His own favored metaphor was putting “an oar in the water” on policy choices, steering quietly from astern.
After Mr. Cheney’s long career as a subordinate, the vice presidency now presented what he saw as an obligation to advance his own views. Although he styled himself as only an adviser to Bush, Mr. Cheney noted that he did not serve at the pleasure of the president and had sworn an independent oath of office.
“I’m not a staffer, I’m the vice president, a constitutional officer, elected same as he is,” Mr. Cheney told his authorized biographer, Stephen F. Hayes.
The defining moment for Mr. Cheney came on a sunny September morning in 2001, when hijacked airliners smashed into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. A Secret Service detail, believing the White House to be a target, burst into Mr. Cheney’s office and frog-marched him by his belt and shoulders to an underground bunker.
As Bush flew to safety that morning, from base to base, aboard Air Force One, avoiding an expected follow-on attack, Mr. Cheney took command in the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. Although he later claimed prior authority from the president, documentary evidence suggested that Mr. Cheney, not Bush, was the first to authorize Air Force fighters to shoot down a passenger jet believed to be under terrorist control.
“It wasn’t a close call,” Mr. Cheney later said of the order to down the civilian plane, which was not carried out because the plane had already crashed in Pennsylvania. “I think a lot of people emotionally look at that and say … ‘My gosh, you just shot down a planeload of Americans.’ On the other hand, you maybe saved thousands of lives. And so it was a matter that required a decision, that required action. It was the right call.”
Before the day ended, Mr. Cheney turned to Addington, his lawyer, and asked him to start thinking about what extraordinary new powers the president would need to respond to al-Qaeda’s attack.
Libby, Mr. Cheney’s chief of staff, compared the vice president to Winston Churchill, the wartime British prime minister who wrote that “all my past life had been but a preparation for this hour and for this trial.”
The vice president brought Bush a draft of his first military order of the new war, a directive removing terrorist suspects from the jurisdiction of any court, foreign or domestic, and ordering that they be tried — if at all — by newly formed “military commissions.”
The president signed the order without change, though most of his national security team had never seen it.
“What the hell just happened?” Powell asked an aide when he saw a report about the order on CNN.
Alienated allies
Especially in Bush’s second term, a long list of comrades fell out with Mr. Cheney on matters ranging from war and peace to tax and budget policy. Disputes over the environment were particularly puzzling to some Cheney critics. He was an avid outdoorsman, who relaxed, when he could not fish, with catalogues of lures. But his campaign to bypass water-use regulations in the Klamath River valley — an intervention on behalf of drought-stricken Oregon farmers — produced the largest human-caused fish kill on record.
One by one, Cheney adversaries were pushed out of the government or resigned, among them Treasury Secretary Paul H. O’Neill, Attorney General John D. Ashcroft, Environmental Protection Agency director Christine Todd Whitman, CIA Director George J. Tenet, Secretary of State Powell and Powell’s deputy, Richard L. Armitage.
But allies also left the administration, most notably his old friend Rumsfeld, whom Bush fired as defense secretary in 2006, and Libby, Mr. Cheney’s chief of staff, who was convicted of perjury and obstruction of justice the following year.
Libby’s case arose from the vice president’s ire at a vocal critic of the Iraq War, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, who accused Mr. Cheney of deliberate public deceit. Attempts to discredit Wilson led to the exposure of Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, as a clandestine CIA officer. A federal jury found that Libby lied about his role in the leak. Armitage and longtime Bush adviser Karl Rove acknowledged their participation and avoided perjury charges.
Evidence introduced during Libby’s trial showed that Mr. Cheney was the first of this group to learn of Plame’s CIA employment and the first to suggest that she could be used to discredit her husband. (Plame had suggested Wilson for a diplomatic mission to check on reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium ore from Niger.) Libby testified twice before a grand jury that he could not remember whether Mr. Cheney directed him to leak Plame’s identity to reporters, but he said, “It’s possible.”
“There is a cloud over what the vice president did,” prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said in his summation, suggesting that Libby had obstructed justice to protect his boss.
In a 2004 interview with federal investigators, Mr. Cheney said 72 times that he could not recall details of his role in the Plame matter. Mr. Cheney refused to answer other questions from prosecutors and FBI agents, saying that he was not permitted to divulge details of discussions he’d had with the president.
Bush’s anger about the case, and Mr. Cheney's equally stubborn defense, opened a breach between them. The president commuted Libby’s sentence, in part, but refused Mr. Cheney’s insistent requests for a pardon. In 2009, Mr. Cheney spoke openly of his anger that Bush had failed to correct a “serious miscarriage of justice.”
In 2018, Trump pardoned Libby, saying, “I don’t know Mr. Libby, but for years I have heard that he has been treated unfairly.”
Mr. Cheney’s lowest moment came in February 2006, when he accidentally shot a 78-year-old friend in the face during a quail-hunting expedition. It was a moment of horror that swiftly became a comic metaphor for the ferocious image Mr. Cheney sometimes cultivated for himself. (He dressed his black Labrador as Darth Vader one Halloween.)
The political damage was heightened by the habitual secrecy that kept the incident under wraps for a full day, and by victim Harry Whittington’s disconcerting apology for embarrassing the vice president.
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, left, shakes hands with Mr. Cheney during an event at the Pentagon in December 2006. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)
Loss of influence
The Cheney imprint on law and policy, which peaked in the first term, had faded considerably by the time he and Bush left office. One episode, above all others, cooled their relationship.
In 2004, when senior government lawyers rose up in protest against the domestic surveillance program that Mr. Cheney had advocated, Bush did not learn of the dispute until the top leadership of the FBI and main Justice Department reached the brink of mass resignation.
Mr. Cheney’s unyielding drive could pose serious political problems for the president, aides said. Bush also grew prickly about accounts that cast Mr. Cheney as the administration’s puppet master.
“I think I’m wiser than that — than to be pigeonholed or, you know, get cornered by a wily adviser,” Bush replied in 2007 when a Fox News reporter asked about perceptions that Mr. Cheney ran the show. “The thing about Vice President Cheney is, he is predictable in many ways, because he brings a set of beliefs. And, uh, they’re firm beliefs.”
Bush aides argued that the president, before making major decisions, had to weigh a far broader array of concerns than those of special interest to Mr. Cheney.
Mr. Cheney “thinks of the national security interest or the prerogatives of the executive,” said Bartlett, a Bush confidant since Texas days. “The president has other considerations he has to take into account. The political fallout of certain reactions — he’s just going to calculate [differently] than Cheney does. He grew accustomed to that.”
Soon after leaving office, Mr. Cheney began work on a memoir, which he wrote with his daughter Liz and which was published in 2012 as “In My Time.” In addition to his wife and two daughters, survivors include seven grandchildren.
Despite an ailing heart and reduced mobility, the former vice president retained a prodigious capacity for work. He rose early and read voraciously. After suffering his fifth heart attack in 2010, he had a heart transplant in 2012. He wrote a book, “Heart: An American Medical Odyssey” (2013) with his cardiologist, Jonathan Reiner, and Liz Cheney.
He allowed himself indulgences, such as a morning drive to Starbucks and attendance at his grandchildren’s soccer and softball games. Butin his later years, much of his time was passed above the garage at his new house in McLean, Virginia, filling legal pads with his slashing longhand. In 2015, he published “Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America,” also written with his daughter Liz.
“When the president made decisions that I didn’t agree with, I still supported him and didn’t go out and undercut him,” Mr. Cheney told his biographer Hayes. “Now we’re talking about after we’ve left office. I have strong feelings about what happened. … And I don’t have any reason not to forthrightly express those views.”
Nov 2, 2025
MeidasTouch and Erika Jordan
As the upper crust partied at Mar-A-Lago for Halloween, government remains shuttered, and everybody who relies on some kind of help remains pretty well conditioned, more or less complacent, and thoroughly fucked.
Oct 28, 2025
GOP Fuckery
The question is, Why?
Social Darwinism is one answer, but again - Why?
If they're counting on AI to take up the slack created by horrendously shitty economic policy that puts millions out of work, I think they're in for a rude surprise.
First because AI is not all it's cracked up to be. It's already beginning to eat itself, as we get more and more stories about how it's "learning" from the material it puts out, and that has caused it to "hallucinate", often churning out product that's way off the mark, if not pure fantasy.
Plus it's a resource hog - especially where water is concerned. Gee, I wonder if that could be a limiting factor in light of a pending global shortage of fresh water due to pollution, and drought driven by climate change.
Second, people - Americans in particular - aren't historically shown to just hang out down on the street corner while their government fucks them with their pants on. No Kings isn't just a bunch of loonies in frog costumes, and purple-haired baristas, and nostalgic Boomers larking about on random Saturdays.
Even the kind of unprecedented Money-n-Power these wannabe plutocrats have doesn't make them bulletproof - metaphorically or otherwise.
I prefer the Gandhi approach, but there's a bit of Luigi in all of us.
Anyway, Republicans are ignorantly fucking with things better left to people who actually know what the fuck they're doing.
Oct 17, 2025
Aug 28, 2025
Today's Oy
The most Trumpianly stoopid thing lately:
Trump will have to replace the board members before Abramowitz goes anywhere.
A federal judge just BLOCKED Kari Lake from ousting VOA Director Michael Abramowitz, saying that Abramowitz can only be removed by a majority vote of the VOA’s advisory board - members of which Trump has fired.
Trump will have to replace the board members before Abramowitz goes anywhere.
Aug 26, 2025
Fighting Back
You don't just knuckle under - even when the deck is stacked against you.
How long have most of us known that the game is rigged against us by people who are filthy stinking rich, and that to large degree, we're just pissin' into the wind?
We don't have to rely totally on people in positions of power to push back. It's going to take an awful lot of us, and it's going to be a long road.
So I can take a little seemingly minor encouragement from a Fed Governor who's basically telling Trump, "Fuck off, Tacoboy McYamtits."
BREAKING: Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook responds after Trump said he is “firing” her.
"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022."
"President Trump purported to fire me 'for cause' when no cause exists under the law, and he has no authority to do so. I will not resign. I will continue to carry out my duties to help the American economy as I have been doing since 2022."
Fed Gov Lisa Cook
Aug 10, 2025
Big Texas Nuthin'
I guess my main question is: Since when is Ken Paxton all persnickety about bribery?
Second - when it seems like all they ever do is pick at each other like a coupla bratty kids in the back seat on a road trip, how the fuck is anybody supposed to have any great faith in the system?
Third - degrading our confidence in the system is one of the GOP's main goals (has been for a long time). The more they can make us feel disgusted by their antics, the more likely we are to accept a plan to tear it all down and start over.
Justice Department declined to prosecute Ken Paxton in final weeks of Biden’s term, AP sources say
The federal investigation had been the most serious inquiry still facing Paxton, who settled a securities fraud case and was acquitted of corruption charges in the Texas Senate in 2023 following a historic impeachment.
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department quietly decided in the final weeks of the Biden administration not to prosecute Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, effectively ending the corruption investigation that cast a long shadow over the political career of a close ally of President Donald Trump, The Associated Press has learned.
The decision not to bring charges — which has never been publicly reported — resolved the high-stakes federal probe before Trump's new Justice Department leadership could even take action on an investigation sparked by allegations from Paxton's inner circle that the Texas Republican abused his office to aid a political donor.
The move came almost two years after the Justice Department’s public integrity section in Washington took over the investigation, removing the case from the hands of federal investigators in Texas who had believed there was sufficient evidence for an indictment.
Two people familiar with the matter, who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, confirmed the department's decision to decline to prosecute. Though the date of the decision was not immediately clear, it was made in the final weeks of the President Joe Biden’s presidency, one of the people said.
The federal investigation had been the most serious inquiry still facing Paxton, who settled a securities fraud case and was acquitted of corruption charges in the Texas Senate in 2023 following a historic impeachment.
The decision not to bring charges — which has never been publicly reported — resolved the high-stakes federal probe before Trump's new Justice Department leadership could even take action on an investigation sparked by allegations from Paxton's inner circle that the Texas Republican abused his office to aid a political donor.
The move came almost two years after the Justice Department’s public integrity section in Washington took over the investigation, removing the case from the hands of federal investigators in Texas who had believed there was sufficient evidence for an indictment.
Two people familiar with the matter, who spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, confirmed the department's decision to decline to prosecute. Though the date of the decision was not immediately clear, it was made in the final weeks of the President Joe Biden’s presidency, one of the people said.
-more-
Aug 5, 2025
BKjr Is A Fuckin' Idiot
Aug 4 (Reuters) - The Florida Department of Health said on Monday that there have been 21 cases of Campylobacter and E. coli infections linked to drinking raw milk in the state, including six children under 10.
The state health department reported seven hospitalizations linked to the consumption of raw milk containing disease-causing bacteria from a particular farm in Northeast/Central Florida.
"Sanitation practices in this farm are of particular concern due to the number of cases," the health department said.
The Shiga toxin-producing E. coli and Campylobacter infections can cause diarrhea, vomiting and stomach cramps. In severe cases, they can cause kidney failure, which is of particular concern for children, the health department said.
In Florida, raw milk is sold only for non-human consumption as pet or animal food, which limits sanitary regulation efforts. Containers must be clearly labeled that the raw milk is for animal consumption only.
Federal health officials have warned against consuming raw milk due to the bird flu outbreak in the United States.
U.S. Health Secretary Kennedy has been a proponent of raw milk.
Jul 24, 2025
Jul 11, 2025
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)