Jun 29, 2022

Jan6 Stuff

"I had no involvement..."

Except the part where my COS was going to mule the thing over to Pence.

Honest, all I know is that some guy asked me to stuff these little balloons up my butt and then go shit in this other guy's office - I was just trying to do a favor for a colleague.

Chris Hayes - MSNBC

Jan6 Stuff


There's no telling who's being truthful and who's just makin' shit up - not really.

But when someone goes under oath and answers every question with no hesitation or apparent pretense, while someone else sits off-site and snarks about it - I think I know which is the safer bet.

Remember, Cass Hutchinson is a Republican. Her job - as she stated - was to help the COS get the best out of the president, and to point up all the good things he was doing for the country.

(I just gagged a little on that last bit - sorry - let's continue)

Anyway, Tony Ornato is a Secret Service guy / political adviser - which is not supposed to happen but whatever - so there's a fair probability that Ornato was indulging in a little "my guy is a macho guy and he made a move on me, but I'm a loyal servant to POTUS, and my job is to be just as macho and blah blah blah".

So maybe Ornato was just spinning yarn. But maybe he wasn't. So we're right back to where we were - who's under oath and who's blowin' smoke?


WaPo: (pay wall)

Pro-Trump web raced to debunk Jan. 6 testimony. Then they got confused.

The former president’s supporters quickly spun an online conspiracy theory that he couldn’t have possibly lunged for his driver’s steering wheel on Jan. 6, 2021. When evidence suggested otherwise, they tried other routes to distract from the truth.


Former president Donald Trump’s supporters online sought to undercut stunning testimony Tuesday to the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection, seeking to belittle Cassidy Hutchinson’s claims that she was told Trump had lunged for the steering wheel of his vehicle and attempted to throttle a member of his security detail when they refused to take him to the Capitol as rioters were besieging the building.

In sworn testimony, Hutchinson said she heard of the physical altercation from Tony Ornato, a Secret Service agent who served as the White House deputy chief of staff for operations. She said he told the story in front of Bobby Engel, the head of Trump’s security detail, at whom Trump reportedly lunged during the altercation. Neither man has testified.

“I’m the f-ing president,” she said Ornato quoted the president shouting as they drove him to the White House and away from the Capitol.

Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified on June 28 that former president Donald Trump lunged at a secret service agent on Jan. 6. (Video: Reuters)

Trump supporters quickly snapped back online that they’d found an obvious sign she was lying: The presidential limousine, known as “the Beast,” is so heavily fortified that they argued it would be “physically impossible” for Trump to cross from the back cabin to the driver’s seat.

But Trump was not riding in the limousine that day; videos show he actually rode in a Secret Service SUV, where the seats are closer together.

Even if he had ridden in the Beast, the rear and front seats have a glass window the president can lower whenever he’d like — a detail noted even in the same infographic that Trump supporters shared as proof that Hutchinson’s story couldn’t be right.

Trump made the same argument on Truth Social, the Twitter clone his allies created after he was banned from Twitter following the Jan. 6 attack. “Her Fake story … is ‘sick’ and fraudulent,” he wrote, adding it “wouldn’t even have been possible to do such a ridiculous thing.”

But two Secret Service agents who have worked in the Beast told The Washington Post that such a move from the president might have been tough, given the limo’s interior equipment — but not impossible.

The quibbling followed an aggressive campaign before the testimony by pro-Trump commenters on social networks, blogs and message boards seeking to portray Hutchinson, an aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, as an irrelevant attention seeker.

The pro-Trump blog Gateway Pundit called Hutchinson “another grifter … using Tuesday’s show trials to audition for a spot on CNN or MSNBC.” The conservative media firebrand John Cardillo tweeted that she was “a glorified receptionist and coffee fetcher in Meadows’ office … relaying boring office gossip, acting as if she had more access and input than she ever actually did.”

But as she recounted stunning details on Tuesday, including in-the-room and previously unreported accounts of Trump’s and Meadows’s actions before and during the insurrection, Trump defenders tried a different tack, saying she was just a rumormonger — even though much of her testimony was supported by written notes and text messages, and all of it was made under oath.

More than 4,000 accounts liked a tweet from a pro-Trump Twitter account calling her “Amber Heard 2.0” — a reference to the actor who recently lost a defamation lawsuit filed by ex-husband Johnny Depp. By Tuesday night, the phrase “Amber Heard 2.0” was trending on Twitter.

Trump supporters, including Donald Trump Jr., also widely echoed a right-wing meme suggesting Hutchinson was like Jussie Smollett, the actor who falsely reported to police that he had been attacked by men screaming “This is MAGA Country.”


On the pro-Trump message board patriots.win, one poster said, “She sounds like a child gossiping.” Some patriots.win posters said the testimony showed how unfairly Trump had been treated. One poster said the story showed that “the Deep State coup plotters” of the Secret Service had “effectively kidnapped the President of the United States of America against his wishes” as part of a “C.I.A. Military Industrial Complex coup d’etat.”

Some there argued she should be “locked up for lying under oath,” while another poster there suggested her wild testimony was just Washington as usual.

“Even if she’s telling the truth,” the anonymous patriots.win poster said, “where’s the f---ing problem?”

Ukraine

Someone's 6-year-old daughter lies dead in the rubble of the house where
she was sleeping in the early morning
as Russian artillery fired on a civilian neighborhood 

This is terrorism
It will burn in the Ukrainian soul for generations
and Russia will not be forgiven



Jun 28, 2022

Overheard


Paul Gosar speaking at a KKK rally

John Cornyn tweeting to President Obama
about bringing back segregation

Mitch McConnell saying black people
vote "just like Americans"

Madison Cawthorn idolizing Hitler

SCOTUS killing Roe v Wade,
and Mary miller praising the decision
as a victory for white life

These are not slips.
These are not mistakes.

These are Republicans
telling us who they are.

Not Pulling Punches

And not mincing words.

Janelle Monae - BET Awards

Today's SCOTUS Fuckup

Standing at midfield after losing another football game and offering up a little prayer is one thing. Making it a spectacle - which puts pressure on others to do likewise - is another thing altogether.

It's not about you having the right to express your commitment to your imaginary friends. It's about some kid who will eventually get beat up for not having the "right" religiousness, or for resisting the pressure outright, or for stating his own belief that there is no god.

We know it's going to happen because it's been happening for more than 20 centuries.

By looking the other way while a school district employee passive-aggressively proselytizes kids, the administration puts its imprimatur on the establishment of religion.

There's a rule against that, and SCOTUS just chipped away at it.



'Beyond shameful': Legal experts slam Neil Gorsuch for using 'flat-out, knowing lie' in SCOTUS ruling

Many people from legal experts to court watchers to journalists to ordinary Americans on social media are criticizing Justice Neil Gorsuch for his majority opinion in a decision siding with a former high school football coach. That coach sued after the school district ordered him to stop praying after every game at the 50-yard line. Justice Gorsuch’s opinion, as many are noticing, appears to be based on facts that are false. Several are accusing Gorsuch of just plain lying.

Justice Gorsuch claimed the coach’s First Amendment rights were violated, and that he was merely engaging in “quiet personal prayer” as he knelt.

Gorsuch uses the word “quiet” 14 times, as The Washington Post’s Paul Waldman notes.


“Joseph Kennedy lost his job as a high school football coach because he knelt at midfield after games to offer a quiet prayer of thanks,” Justice Gorsuch writes as he begins his majority opinion. “Mr. Kennedy prayed during a period when school employees were free to speak with a friend, call for a reservation at a restaurant, check email, or attend to other personal matters. He offered his prayers quietly while his students were otherwise occupied. Still, the Bremerton School District disciplined him anyway. It did so because it thought anything less could lead a reasonable observer to conclude (mistakenly) that it endorsed Mr. Kennedy’s religious beliefs. That reasoning was misguided.”

“The contested exercise here does not involve leading prayers with the team,” Gorsuch continues (despite photos that appear to suggest otherwise), “the District disciplined Mr. Kennedy only for his decision to persist in praying quietly without his students after three games in October 2015.”

These are the photos of Coach Kennedy that Justice Sonia Sotomayor included in her dissent:




“They aren’t even trying to use reason anymore,” former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade laments:

And Vox’s Ian Millhiser makes clear what just happened: “The Supreme Court hands the religious right a big victory by lying about the facts of a case.”

Calling the decision “a big victory for the religious right,” Millhiser writes that’s “only because Gorsuch misrepresents the facts of the case.”


- more -

Bring on the Satanic Temple.

Everything you need to know about the Satanic Temple, which the US government just officially recognized as an organized religion

  • The US government has recognized the Satanic Temple as a tax-exempt organized religion.
  • The Satanic temple is a non-theistic religious group.
  • It is based out of Salem, Massachusetts, but it has branches across the US and world.
  • Founded in 2013, it has roots in political activism.
  • It is different from the Church of Satan.

Jun 27, 2022

Today's Trae

Trae Crowder - Liberal Redneck

Hypocrisy reigns supreme

Today's Tweet


Speak slowly and clearly, and don't use too many big words.

Buy This Now


The ghost of RBG wants you to know
the morning after pill
is available on Amazon
and has a 3-year shelf life

Water

Need to shower up? Find it on Craigs List for about 5 bucks.

John Oliver - Last Week Tonight


The feds have put up an entire website dedicated to the subject of Drought Conditions here in USAmerica Inc.