Slouching Towards Oblivion

Saturday, May 26, 2018

Congressman Copperhead


Sorry not sorry - Tom Garrett's a dick.

Rachael Bade, Alex Isenstadt and Kyle Cheney, Politico:
Virginia Rep. Tom Garrett and his wife turned the congressman’s staff into personal servants, multiple former employees to the freshman Republican told POLITICO — assigning them tasks from grocery shopping to fetching the congressman’s clothes to caring for their pet dog, all during work hours.
POLITICO has spoken with four former staffers who detailed a deeply dysfunctional office in which the congressman and his wife, Flanna, often demanded that staff run personal errands outside their typical congressional duties. The couple called on staff to pick up groceries, chauffeur Garrett’s daughters to and from his Virginia district, and fetch clothes that the congressman forgot at his Washington apartment. They were even expected to watch and clean up after Sophie, their Jack Russell-Pomeranian mix, the aides said.
The staffers said they feared that if they refused Garrett‘s or his wife’s orders — both were known for explosive tempers — they would struggle to advance in their careers. It wasn't just full-time staff: many of the allegedly inappropriate requests were made of interns, the former aides said.
- and -
A spokesman for Garrett, Matt Missen, declined to address a detailed list of complaints about the office.
“We see no reason to respond to anonymous, unfounded allegations primarily targeting Congressman Garrett’s wife, made by POLITICO’s ‘unnamed’ sources,” he said. “It is easy to spread untruths and even easier to exaggerate and imply wrongdoing when none exists.”
That's a fairly lengthy "no comment", Mr Missen.

And then - I guess continuing in "no comment mode":
Missen said there is “no ethics investigation” into the office and that “to ensure that all staff follow the rules, Congressman Garrett has had lawyers from the House Ethics Committee meet with him and his staff (to include district staff via telephone) to brief everyone on the ethics rules pertaining to congressmen and staff, and to answer any questions.”
That's classic.

First, the non-denial denial, covered in a thick creamy layer of passive language.

But second - holy crap. Both Mr Garrett and Mrs Garrett assigned public employees tasks that have nothing to do with conducting the public's business - obviously in violation of ethics rules, if not strictly illegal - and the solution Garrett hits on is to get the Ethics Office lawyers to come in and explain to the staffers that what the staffers did was wrong.

Chutzpah, level: Supreme High Master Asshole.

And BTW, can you say "waste fraud and abuse", motherfucker?

Friday, May 25, 2018

Today's Tweet



Because the Christianist GOP is a big buncha pinch-faced blue-nosed puritans.

The Buzz


So many Russians. Every time we learn a bit more about Cult45 and their election year fuckery, we get more names that are always very Russian-ey, and the rubes get even more adamant about their support for a POTUS who's obviously crooked like a mountain road.

Makes me wonder how all of this would be playing out if those names were like Ramirez or Garcia or Montano.


Bob Cesca's contribution (at about 30:20) is another good one.

This week's recap - Buzz Burbank

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Today's Tweet



On Immigration

Nish Kumar, BBC Two:

Sam

Samantha Bee - Wednesdays at 10:30 on TBS




The basic approach is pretty simple.

First, you throw out the rules that keep powerful people more or less in line thru the reasonable expectation that they'll stay true to their word, and conduct themselves with some sense of fairness and integrity - the honor of normal decent people is what makes them generally more trustworthy than not.

Second, throw every piece of shit you can find into the air conditioning system. Keep everybody so busy just trying to catalog it that they have no time or energy even to triage all the shit.

Third, look for the pieces of shit that provide the greatest benefit (money &/or power) while attracting the least amount of attention (ie: resistance).

More NFL Stoopid

Elizabeth Bruenig, WaPo
On one level, it does seem just as cold and calculated as the old days, when the NFL was swapping salutes for cash. If you have to threaten someone into showing respect, whatever they end up showing isn’t respect but a simulation of it for someone else’s consumption. The fact that the rule has already been made public just means that everyone is aware that this is the portion of the game when the NFL forces its players to stand still while they play a song, or else. The meaning of it all washes out; the fines make it entirely situational: It’s a workplace compliance issue, a matter of the NFL making its performers sell its customers what they want to buy. The content is meaningless.
From Mike’s 10 Commandments:
2. Be true to the ideal, not just to the symbol.

- and -
If not money, then what? There is the evident racial component, bolstered by the bizarre involvement of the president, which has everything to do with disciplining black people in public, a long-running American obsession. But I suspect there’s something more, something wider and stranger, at the root of all this fury over a few athletes quietly kneeling during their country’s anthem. For one, there’s the straightforward fact that kneeling isn’t a sign of disrespect, and nobody brought up in a country with the faintest hint of Christian culture actually thinks it is. As Luke Bretherton, a professor of theological ethics at Duke University, wrote last year in The Post: “New Testament stories describe people who kneel before Jesus in supplication or lament. With their kneeling, these biblical figures say: Something is desperately wrong, please hear us and use your power to help us. Their act of submission signals their faith that healing will come and their prayers will be answered.”
- and a tweet:



Wednesday, May 23, 2018

Today's Tweet



The simple fact that this shit still seems to be something of a surprise for you is why 45*'s attacks are effective - you insist on acting like Press Poodles, and the criticism sticks.

Today's Corporate Overreach


Albert Breer, Sports Illustrated:
ATLANTA — On Tuesday, NFL owners put three hours aside for a privileged session to speak—amongst themselves and family members—about the most sensitive of topics.
One was how the league will handle players kneeling during the national anthem going forward. An idea being floated in the room goes like this: It would be up to the home team on whether both teams come out of the locker room for the anthem, and, should teams come out, 15-yard penalties could be assessed for kneeling.
The league is currently being sued by Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid, with the two unsigned free agents alleging that NFL teams colluded to keep them unemployed. Kaepernick was the first NFL player to kneel during the national anthem, to protest police brutality, starting a trend that swept across the league in 2016 and '17.
The NFL addressed the anthem issue at its meetings in October and March, with plans to further discuss it at this meeting. The league also met with the Players Coalition in October, and agreed to a seven-year, $89 million social-justice partnership.
According to sources, the owners also discussed how to move forward its partnership with the players and finalized the terms of the deal.
My dearest NFL,

Fuck you.

Even if you decide not to go thru with it, you're seriously considering it. Add this to all your other attempts to manipulate and control players to the point where most of them lose everything no matter what they're willing to sacrifice in order to play a game that makes a very few people obscenely wealthy, and I can only conclude one thing - fuck you.

Your pal,

Mike

Today's GIF

Clinton
Bush 43
Obama
...and...

One of these is not like the others