Showing posts with label Epstein. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Epstein. Show all posts

Nov 16, 2025

Hard To Explain the Difference

  • Pedophilia
  • Hebephilia
  • Ephebophilia


Splitting hairs is a way to discount the whole thing - to make it sound like it might actually be reasonable to pressure underage girls (who are 40 years your junior) to have sex with you - and sometimes forcing yourself on them - if they're 15 instead of 12.

"Yeah, OK - he was guilty of Statutory Rape because he was diddling underage girls, but at least he wasn't fucking children!"

No, asshole. Sex with underage girls is fucking children. You fucking pervy fuck.


Nov 14, 2025

OK - Next?



Epstein in newly released email said Bill Clinton was never ‘on the island’

Convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein wrote in a 2011 email released by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Wednesday that former President Clinton “never” visited his private island.

(sic):
“[T]hese stories are complete ant utter fantasy,, I don’t know and have never met Al gore, CLinton was never on the island.. the telephone book is not mine, it was stolen by my houseman that is currently in prison for doing so,” Epstein wrote to someone dubbed “The Duke,” whose email address is redacted.

This email is among 20,000 pages of documents released Wednesday from Epstein’s estate. The push for more information about Epstein escalated this week, as House members returned to Washington to end the government shutdown.

For months, Democrats and Republicans in the lower chamber have advocated for the release of information about Epstein. A discharge petition on Wednesday successfully teed up a vote on the House floor on the matter for as soon as next week.

Global figures and top businessmen, including Clinton, President Trump, former Prince Andrew and Elon Musk, among others, have come under scrutiny for reported links to the disgraced financier.

House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) previously said Clinton’s alleged links to Epstein should be unveiled after he subpoenaed the former president for testimony before Congress this summer.

“Everybody in America wants to know what went on in Epstein Island, and we’ve all heard reports that Bill Clinton was a frequent visitor there, so he’s a prime suspect to be deposed by the House Oversight Committee,” Comer said on Newsmax in August.

The Kentucky Republican also subpoenaed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for testimony in House Republicans’ investigation on matters around Epstein.

The Hill reached out to Clinton’s office and a press representative for former Vice President Al Gore.

Nov 12, 2025

Closer And Closer

It's not a terribly smart thing to hold your breath on this shit.
  • Trump is pressuring Boebert and Mace hard to get their names off the discharge petition
  • Even if the vote is called, there's bound to be delays - debate, conference meetings, etc
  • If the thing passes, there's no guarantee Johnson will act quickly to deliver the demand to Bondi
  • Bondi almost absolutely fight it and stall and do whatever Trump instructs her to do
  • This is Trump, so he'll take it to court and we'll spend a year waiting - unless enough Republicans get antsy enough about the re-election chances if it drags out and remains an issue during the mid-term campaigns
So yes, it's pretty damned close to being the smoking gun, but since there's no honor in MAGA, the GOP, or the White House - we can't reasonably expect any of them to act honorably.


Oct 3, 2025

90%

You can't get 90% of Americans to agree on whether it's light or dark outside at noon on a sunny day.

When a respected, reputable polling outfit posts results showing just 9% of us don't want the Epstein Files released, that should be a pretty good hint for the Congress Critters that they need to get up off their asses and do their fuckin' job.


Most Americans want the Epstein files released, poll finds

About three-quarters of Americans support the release of all files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, a new PBS News/NPR/Marist poll finds.

Another 13% want some of the Epstein files released, while
only 9% don’t want any documents released.

President Donald Trump’s administration has faced growing bipartisan pressure to release the government’s files on Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while in jail awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges.

- more -


Sep 25, 2025

Shutdown

Nobody should be surprised that Republicans are making no effort to avoid the shutdown.
  • Republicans hate government, and are quite willing to do just about anything to further their project of tearing it all down in order to install a corporate-style plutocracy
  • By shutting it down, they delay the release of the Epstein Files
Adelita Grijalva was set to take her place in The House next week, but Speaker Johnson sent everybody home until October 7.

Grijalva has committed to being the deciding (218th) signature on the Discharge Petition, which will force Johnson to bring a vote to the floor on whether or not to demand DOJ to deliver the Epstein Files to Congress.

There are some other probabilities here too, not the least of which is using a shutdown to kill some functions &/or agencies that "conservatives" really don't like.

The key for me here is that OMB is talking about firing people and not putting them on furlough.


White House to agencies: Prepare mass firing plans for a potential shutdown

In memo, the Trump administration says the Reduction-in-Force plans would go beyond standard shutdown furloughs.

The White House budget office is instructing federal agencies to prepare reduction-in-force plans for mass firings during a possible government shutdown, specifically targeting employees who work for programs that are not legally required to continue.

The Office of Management and Budget move to permanently reduce the government workforce if there is a shutdown, outlined in a memo shared with POLITICO ahead of release to agencies tonight, escalates the stakes of a potential shutdown next week.

In the memo, OMB told agencies to identify programs, projects and activities where discretionary funding will lapse on Oct. 1 and no alternative funding source is available. For those areas, OMB directed agencies to begin drafting RIF plans that would go beyond standard furloughs, permanently eliminating jobs in programs not consistent with President Donald Trump’s priorities in the event of a shutdown.

The move marks a significant break from how shutdowns have been handled in recent decades, when most furloughs were temporary and employees were brought back once Congress voted to reopen government and funding was restored. This time, OMB Director Russ Vought is using the threat of permanent job cuts as leverage, upping the ante in the standoff with Democrats in Congress over government spending.

“Programs that did not benefit from an infusion of mandatory appropriations will bear the brunt of a shutdown,” OMB wrote in the memo. Agencies were told to submit their proposed RIF plans to OMB and to issue notices to employees even if they would otherwise be excepted or furloughed during a lapse in funding.

Programs that will continue regardless of a shutdown include Social Security, Medicare, veterans benefits, military operations, law enforcement, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection and air traffic control, according to an OMB official granted anonymity to share information not yet public.

The guidance comes as Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill are locked in an impasse over funding, with just days before the fiscal year ends Sept. 30. The House passed a stopgap spending measure to float federal operations through Nov. 21, but Democrats in the Senate have refused to advance it, demanding that Republicans come to the table to negotiate a bipartisan package that could include an extension of expiring Affordable Care Act subsidies.

The OMB letter notes that if Congress successfully passes a clean stopgap bill prior to Sept. 30, the additional steps outlined in this email will not be necessary.

The memo appears to vindicate warnings issued by some Democrats — most prominently Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — during the last shutdown standoff in March. Schumer at the time moved to allow a GOP-written spending bill to pass, arguing that a shutdown would be a “gift” allowing Trump and his deputies “to destroy vital government services at a significantly faster rate than they can right now.”

Schumer says he has since revised that view, saying this month that the administration’s attacks on federal agencies “will get worse with or without [a shutdown], because Trump is lawless.”

He made a similar point Wednesday after POLITICO published details of the memo, calling it an “attempt at intimidation.”

“This is nothing new and has nothing to do with funding the government,” he said. “These unnecessary firings will either be overturned in court or the administration will end up hiring the workers back, just like they did as recently as today.”

But House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries struck a different note in an X post that appeared to take the threat seriously. He addressed it to voters in federal-worker-rich Virginia, who will soon elect a governor and other state officials.

“Their goal is to ruin your life and punish hardworking families already struggling with Trump Tariffs and inflation,” he said. “Remember in November.”

Sep 8, 2025

More Epstein Shit

If Trump says he knows everything about it, he knows nothing about it.

If Trump says he knows nothing about it, he knows plenty about it.

Uh-oh

KOAM-TV7 - Joplin MO

Mar-a-Lago Member Reportedly Made Crude Gag About Epstein Selling Trump a Woman for $22,500

A member of President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club joked about the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein selling Trump a “fully depreciated” woman for $22,500 in 2003, according to a new report.


On Monday, members of the House Oversight Committee received a copy of a birthday book that was put together for Epstein’s 50th birthday in 2003, including a bizarre birthday message Trump reportedly sent to Epstein – which the president has denied penning.

The birthday book also reportedly featured contributions from former President Bill Clinton and billionaire investor Leon Black, as well as a letter written by Mar-a-Lago member Joel Pashcow joking about Epstein selling Trump a woman.

“Jeffrey showing early talents with money + women! Sells ‘fully depreciated’ [redacted] to Donald Trump for $22,500,” read the letter published by the Wall Street Journal. “Showed early ‘people skills’ too. Even though I handled the deal I didn’t get any of the money on the girl!”

The letter included a photo of Epstein and others holding up a giant fake check purportedly from Trump to Epstein for $22,500.

While the woman’s name was redacted in the letter on Monday, she was reportedly someone whom Trump and Epstein “socialized with in the 1990s,” according to the Journal, which cited unnamed sources “familiar with the matter.”

A lawyer for the woman told the newspaper that their client had no prior knowledge of the letter and did not know Pashcow.

Trump is currently suing the Wall Street Journal for reporting on his alleged birthday letter to Epstein, claiming the document was a “FAKE.”

After the Journal published a photo of the letter on Monday, the White House insisted that Trump was not responsible for signing it or for drawing the figure of a naked lady.

Sep 3, 2025

An Open Threat

Trump's message to House Republicans:
"Helping Thomas Massie and Liberal Democrats with their attention-seeking, while the DOJ is fully supporting a more comprehensive file release effort from the Oversight Committee would be viewed as a very hostile act to the administration."


Aug 25, 2025

Today's Belle

The Press Poodles continue ducking the work.

Trump held a little presser in the oval today, and none of them asked one lousy question about the increasingly obvious stonewalling by Bondi and Patel.


Aug 23, 2025

Ghislaine Maxwell's Profferred Immunity Interview

Maxwell committed perjury during her trials. There's every reason to doubt everything she said during 6 hours of deposition.

(Total understanding on the TLDR - apologies for the totally shitty sound quality)

 

Aug 14, 2025

Epstein


Again - as bad as the pedophilia is, there's a probability greater than zero that the money shit could be that bad, and maybe even worse.


Part 1


Part 2

Aug 3, 2025

What Was Epstein


There's nothing basically wrong with a college dropout from Coney Island hustling all the way up to a townhouse in Manhattan, a place in Paris, an 8,000-acre ranch in New Mexico, and a coupla private islands in the Caribbean - plus airplanes and a helicopter and a whole fleet of cars.

It's the kind of story Americans love to hear - "local boy makes good". It makes us want to believe that maybe the big dream isn't dead after all.

But all of that rings dull and hollow with The Life And Times Of Jeffrey Epstein.

I think for the most part, he was a pimp. But I also think there may be quite a bit more to it than that.

As bad as the pedophile and trafficking shit is - and it's plenty bad - there's at least some probability that the stories about the money are going to be even bigger and worser.

This Patrick Boyle guy's new for me - he just popped up in my YouTube feed. And though his presentation's a bit dry, this piece is chock full of interesting goodies.

Jul 29, 2025

Epstein


As usual, the wrangling is in progress, and the delay is likely about making sure Trump's ass is covered while doing as much damage to the Democrats as possible, without making it look too obvious.

But this is Trump - they really don't care how ham-handed it is. This is going to continue to be a total clusterfuck.


We texted nearly 1,100 Americans about Trump and the Epstein files.

How closely are Americans following news about government files from the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, and what do they think about President Donald Trump’s handling of the issue? The Washington Post texted 1,089 people Monday to ask.

The Post’s poll found that most Americans are paying at least some attention to news about the Epstein files. Americans largely disapprove of how Trump is handling the issue, with most Democrats and independents disapproving and Republicans expressing a mix of approval and uncertainty. Most Americans strongly support releasing all files in the Epstein case and suspect the documents contain embarrassing information about Trump, Democrats and billionaires.



The poll found that about 1 in 4 U.S. adults (26 percent) are paying “a lot” of attention to news about the Epstein files, while another 38 percent are paying “some” attention. That is somewhat lower than attention to the Los Angeles protests of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in June, which 34 percent followed “a lot” in a similar poll that month.

Asked to describe why they are following Epstein news, people cited curiosity about whether public figures would be implicated, with some specifying Trump.


I’m curious, seems like a big story and seemingly important people could be implicated in it.
Ohio man, 45, independent

I want to find out who went to the island.
Nevada man, 61, MAGA Republican

I want to know what government officials, celebrities, and other public figures were at his island based on what we know about his case.
Indiana man, 27, independent

It is super suspicious that the Trump administration is now not releasing the files.
Oregon woman, 34, Democrat

Democrats are paying more attention than independents or Republicans, although majorities across party lines say they are paying at least some attention to the issue, including self-described MAGA Republicans who support the “Make American Great Again” movement.



Fewer than 2 in 10 Americans approve of the way Trump is handling issues related to the Epstein files while nearly 6 in 10 disapprove and more than 2 in 10 have no opinion. Asked to explain their answers, some said Trump was not being transparent, and others cited suspicions that Trump was hiding information.

Trump is not forthcoming with information. Seems a lot more likely as if he has something to hide.
Massachusetts man, 59, independent

He is avoiding what he promised to do: Release the files. He’s trying to cover up the truth.
New Jersey woman, 66, Democrat

I don’t really care about the Epstein files. I think it is an overblown conspiracy theory.
Tennessee woman, 68, MAGA Republican

He’s doing what he needs to do to get the results out.
North Carolina woman, 55, MAGA Republican

About 9 in 10 Democrats and more than 6 in 10 independents disapprove of Trump’s handling of the Epstein files. Republicans are divided, with 38 percent approving, 38 percent reporting “no opinion” and 24 percent disapproving. Just over 4 in 10 MAGA Republicans approve of Trump on the Epstein issue, while just under 2 in 10 disapprove and nearly 4 in 10 have no opinion.


Open-ended responses show some MAGA Republicans expressing faith that Trump will handle the issue properly — including some that expect he will release more information — while others said they are not following the issue closely.


An overwhelming majority of the public supports releasing all files from the Epstein case, including two-thirds who support this “strongly.”



The Post poll finds about 6 in 10 Americans think the Epstein files contain embarrassing information about Trump and nearly two-thirds say the same about Democrats. More than 8 in 10 suspect they contain embarrassing information about billionaires.


Majorities of Americans across party lines predict that there is embarrassing information about Democrats and billionaires in the Epstein files. When it comes to Trump, most Democrats and independents suspect there is embarrassing information about him in there, dropping to about 3 in 10 Republicans overall and 2 in 10 MAGA Republicans. Some 4 in 10 Republicans — including 44 percent of MAGA Republicans — say they are not sure if there is embarrassing information about Trump in the files.


About 1 in 7 Americans (15 percent) believe the medical examiner’s ruling that Epstein died by suicide, while almost three times as many believe Epstein was murdered (44 percent). A sizable 42 percent say they are unsure how he died.

Jul 28, 2025

Today's Keith

Trump the deal maker is making a deal to let a pedophile - a child rapist - off the hook.


"I'll give you a list."

Jul 27, 2025

It's Wide And Deep

Still wondering why Trump was determined to fuck with NPR?


Epstein's sex trafficking was aided by JPMorgan, a U.S. Virgin Islands lawsuit says

The government of the U.S. Virgin Islands alleges in a lawsuit filed this week that JPMorgan Chase "turned a blind eye" to evidence that disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein used the bank to facilitate sex-trafficking activities on Little St. James, the private island he owned in the territory until his 2019 suicide.

In a more than 100-page complaint filed by U.S.V.I. Attorney General Denise George in the Southern District of New York in Manhattan on Tuesday, the territory alleges that JPMorgan failed to report Epstein's suspicious activities and provided the financier with services reserved for high-wealth clients after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution in Palm Beach, Fla.

The complaint says the territory's Department of Justice investigation "revealed that JP Morgan knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully provided and pulled the levers through which recruiters and victims were paid and was indispensable to the operation and concealment of the Epstein trafficking enterprise."

It accused the bank of ignoring evidence for "more than a decade because of Epstein's own financial footprint, and because of the deals and clients that Epstein brought and promised to bring to the bank."

"These decisions were advocated and approved at the senior levels of JP Morgan," it said.

The bank allegedly "facilitated and concealed wire and cash transactions that raised suspicion of — and were in fact part of — a criminal enterprise whose currency was the sexual servitude of dozens of women and girls in and beyond the Virgin Islands," according to the complaint, which included several pages that were redacted in whole or in part.

It said that human trafficking "was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JP Morgan."

When NPR reached JPMorgan Chase, the bank declined to comment.

Tuesday's legal action comes just weeks after the U.S.V.I. announced a $105 million settlement with Epstein's estate, meant in part to claw back "more than $80 million in economic development tax benefits that Epstein and his co-defendants fraudulently obtained to fuel his criminal enterprise," the attorney general's office said in a Dec. 1 statement.

Additionally, the settlement calls for the territory to receive half of the proceeds from the sale of Little St. James island "on which Epstein resided and on which many of his crimes occurred."

After a family had reported that Epstein had sexually abused her 14-year-old daughter in 2005, police in Palm Beach opened an investigation that led to a guilty plea three years later. Under the terms of the deal with the state of Florida, Epstein served 13 months in a work-release program, was forced to pay restitution to the victims and register as a sex offender.

Epstein was again arrested on similar charges in New York in 2019, but killed himself in federal prison while awaiting trial.

Deutsche Bank was investigated in 202o by New York state authorities for failing to report suspicious activity in Epstein's account despite knowing of his criminal history. The bank later agreed to pay a $150 million penalty.

Keep In Mind

Ghislaine Maxwell isn't the focus right now. She's a fucking monster who's in prison where she belongs.

The point now is to see if we need to send Trump and other predators to keep her company.


Jul 25, 2025

The Epstein Mess

Why anyone believes anything that falls out of Donald Trump's big orange tater trap is beyond me.

I just don't fuckin' get it.