Showing posts with label search for truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label search for truth. Show all posts

Sep 9, 2024

Searchable Sick Fucks



Here’s what Americans want to kill, according to Google

A deep dive into Google Search data led us on a somewhat disturbing journey into the American psyche.


If you’re the tiniest bit curious about your fellow humans, we bet that when you type the first part of a phrase into Google, you can’t resist waiting a millisecond see what suggestions appear in the all-seeing search box. It’s usually goofy, confusing or sad. But every once in a while, Google Search shakes your soul.

A couple of months back, amid a now-forgotten search, we paused on “how to …” and the search box completed with “how to kill cicadas.”

What?! Who sees the raw, pre-Columbian abundance of a cicada brood emergence — they were popping up across much of the country at the time — and thinks, “These clumsy, screamy little weirdos deserve to die?” By the time you see them, the periodic ones probably only have a few days or weeks left to live. What the heck is the hurry?

We feared it may speak to something deeper in the American psyche: the impulse among many folks, when confronted with an unfamiliar animal or insect on their property, to evoke a bastardization of the already questionable castle doctrine and kill it where it stands.

To find out, we combed Google Trends and pulled down hundreds of files on two decades of U.S. search habits, seeking an unfiltered glimpse into what Americans are trying to kill.

Google makes its trends data accessible and easy to use. It’s the lowest-hanging fruit in data journalism and the source behind a lot of screwy rankings. But done right, it allows us to peek at impulses that folks aren’t willing to air in public. Always optimistic, we hoped the results of this dive into America’s id would be fun and harmless.

Occasionally, it was. A great many Americans, especially in rural areas, want to know “how to kill time.” Our passion for distraction climbed during pandemic lockdowns and was slow to subside.

But many searches weren’t so benign. Fair warning: This column’s discussion of Google searches gets progressively more awful. So if that’s the kind of thing that would ruin your day, feel free to bail out now.

We’ll start with bugs. The ongoing insect apocalypse does not seem to have registered with homeowners. Insects — and insectlike entities, since Google searchers aren’t always clear on their taxonomy — are one of the few things Americans want to kill even more than time.

By our count, bugs make up more than half of the top 100 entities we’re trying to kill. The rankings aren’t precise, as folks sometimes split their vote between multiple phrases, such as “how to kill centipede,” “how to kill a centipede” and “how to kill centipedes.” But for the most part, we were struck by how consistently Americans described their targets.

Ants, fleas and flies top the insect list. Each of the three has enjoyed some time at the top, but it really depends on when and where you’re searching. Anger against ants hits its apex in May and June. Our wrath shifts to fleas and flies as summer drags on.

What really drew us, though, was the geography. Did you know America’s got a Flea Belt, centered around the South and Appalachia? Someone from Mississippi or West Virginia is more than 10 times as likely to search for “how to kill fleas” than their buddy in the Mountain West.

Folks focus on killing flies in northern states while they aim for ants in the southern half of the country, an area which not coincidentally overlaps with the range of the invasive and unpleasant fire ant.

Cicadas rank mercifully low, in part because they don’t emerge on our radar all that often. But you don’t have to look far to see folks trying to kill benign or even beneficial bugs. Those of us who lie awake mourning the loss of pollinators will be alarmed to see “bees,” “carpenter bees” and “ground bees” on the list. Each have their own large section of the country that wants them dead.

Searches for killing plants don’t inspire the same gut-level horror. The top targets either sound too vague to parse — such as grass, mold or “a tree” — or are invasive species such as ivy or crabgrass. But they all make for magnificent maps, as our rooted rivals vary substantially by region.

We tackle thistle in the plains and prairies; bittersweet in the Northeast; blackberry bushes in the Northwest; Johnson grass and kudzu in the South; something or someone called “creeping Charlie” in the Midwest; and, of course, “goat heads” in Idaho, where we don’t seem to be making much headway despite decades of tireless pull-on-sight efforts from their archnemesis, one Bill Van Dam.

Searches for killing animals, on the other hand, take a dark turn. We can understand why New Englanders Google how to kill a lobster. And we discounted how to kill mockingbirds for obvious novel-related reasons. But we’ll never forgive the folks, many of them in South and Sun Belt, who are googling how to kill lizards or frogs. We have a hard time conjuring up a situation in which a squishy amphibian or retiring reptile has committed a capital offense.

The generous interpretation would be that folks are targeting problematic species — some areas have encouraged hunting invasive frogs and lizards. They could also be harvesting animals for food, as with the aforementioned aquatic arthropods, or fish or chickens. But that breaks down when you learn the most searched for “how to kill” animals are, by far, cats or dogs.

Veterans of any of a multitude of tear-jerking children’s novels can dream up charitable interpretations of those searches. But those charitable interpretations are called into question by the fact that searches for how to kill a dog or cat closely parallel, in both time and geography, searches for “how to get rid of a dog” and “how to get rid of a cat.”

Sadly, it turns out the most popular how-to-kill search of all time is “how to kill yourself.” (We’re as distressed by this as you are.) Such searches bear little relationship to suicide rates from 2004 to 2020 as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. But the blessedly less popular “how to kill myself” shows a stronger correlation.

The almost-good news is this: The long run of “yourself” as the most popular of the “how to kill” searches may be coming to an end. It’s recently been passed by searches for “how to kill time” and, more notably, searches for “how to kill someone.” The latter term surged to new heights as we locked down to stop the spread of the coronavirus, and kept climbing.

A wiser, less data-dependent columnist might spin this as a symbol of where we’re at as a country. Anger and stress we once directed toward ourselves now gets aimed at others. But absent proof, we have to wonder if it’s just a quirk of the data. A Google spokesperson pointed out searches for both terms are relatively infrequent, so we fear they may be affected by changes in how the search engine processes data, or by Americans changing the way we search in response to a meme or some other shift in popular culture.

After all, charting actual CDC death data doesn’t produce a tidy reproduction of the Google searches. Even as searches for “how to kill yourself” have fallen, the rate of suicide has remained tragically steady. And after a sharp pandemic spike, the rate at which Americans kill each other has fallen since 2021.

Sep 8, 2019

"Alternative Facts"

The Daddy State will change the meaning of words to suit their immediate needs.

They denounce Historical Fact as Political Correctness, while demanding that we accept their demagoguery as truth.


WaPo:

CHARLOTTESVILLE — A Monticello tour guide was explaining how enslaved people built, planted and tended a terrace of vegetables at Thomas Jefferson’s estate earlier this summer when a woman interrupted to share her annoyance.

“Why are you talking about that?” she demanded, according to Gary Sandling, vice president of Monticello’s visitor programs and services. “You should be talking about the plants."

At Monticello, George Washington’s Mount Vernon and other plantations across the South, an effort is underway to deal more honestly with the brutal institution that the Founding Fathers relied on to build their homes and their wealth: slavery.

Four hundred years after the first enslaved Africans arrived in the English colony of Virginia, some sites are also connecting that ugly past to modern-day racism and inequality.

Here's the thing - nobody owes you a customized version of history. If you need it to be scrubbed clean so it fits with your narrow viewpoint, go to Disneyland. The rest of us know enough to prefer learning about real things in real ways.
Weirdly, if you spend enough time online, you'll encounter oddball web skulkers barking about some of the weirdest shit you ever heard, swearing to its authenticity, and proclaiming it as the truth that everybody is just too blind to see - specifically citing its wacky oddball-ness as proof of its veracity.  As if the more incredible something is, the more believable it has to be.


Sep 24, 2018

A Question

Mollie Tibbetts was murdered by an "illegal" and Cult45 started jumping and and down screaming, and otherwise losing their shit over it.

"Immigrant" Celia Barquin Arozamena is murdered by a white American-born guy, and  -


So, my question(s): 

Are we looking for balance here? 

Are we seeing something from the Press Poodles that points a finger at GOP cherry-picking? 

And if either or both of those is the case, what's the fuckin' difference?

Welcome to (hopefully) the height of The Propaganda War.

For what it's worth:

Jan 23, 2017

The Balls

In 1993, the Clintons attended 14 inaugural balls.

Laura & W went to 8 of 'em in 2001.

And the Obamas had 10 in 2009.

Trump had 2, and they were lightly attended - Trump's 2 itty-bitty sad little balls.

*Is any of this true? Who gives a fuck - this is the Post-Truth World of Alt-Fact.
It's not a question of True vs False. The only thing that matters now is what you choose to believe at any given moment.
And that's how the bad guys get power; and how they stay in power.

Jan 1, 2017

Pick A Side

In today's little fit of nostalgia, I'll say that we used to have movies for grownups where the lines were drawn pretty clearly. I'm not saying there's always a perfect dichotomy, but most of the time, there's a fairly obvious distinction between what's right and what's not, and art should illustrate those values for us - or at least reflect the values we manifest in living our everyday lives.

At some point you have to be able to step back and take a look at your own position. An art-form is supposed to help us with this self-examination thing, but it seems like something's shifted, and we've been pushed off kilter.

When I look back on some of the great movies that helped us figure ourselves out, and I start to wonder about overlaying those lessons onto our ideological alignments today, I can't help but think an awful lotta people would find themselves on the wrong side.

12 Angry Men




Seven Days In May



It's A Wonderful Life



Executive Suite


I promise this is not just me wanting to go back to some simpler time - there's no such thing in the first place. 

But what I'm always going to be harping on is that we have to be committed to believing as many true things as possible and not believing as many false things as possible. And we have to keep learning and relearning the skills we need to know the difference.

Dec 29, 2016

Once More From The Top

Test for truth:
The presence of Confirming Evidence
--and--
The absence of Conflicting Evidence

Test for bullshit:
The absence of Confirming Evidence
--or--
The presence of Conflicting Evidence

Dec 22, 2015

Happy Whatever Doesn't Offend You

... or does... or something else entirely.  We do get to choose.


The world starts to die every year at the beginning of Summer, and the world starts to come back to life every year at the end of Autumn. Just get past the bottom and you're on your way back up again.

Apr 20, 2015

Found My Guy

If Hillary wins the nomination, I'll shove a coupla pounds of Limburger in each nostril and vote for the Queen of Triangulated Favor Trading, but then again, I may hafta write in Martin O'Malley.

Starting at about 4:00, he gets to the heart of the problems with the GOP's "economic policy", and the payoff is right at 4:30.


This guy'd best be more careful with that whole truth-telling shit.  That's not the kinda thing these Press Poodles are equipped to handle.

(from the NPR website)
hat tip = JR

And one last thing, NPR - that headline you guys put up on the piece - O'Malley: America's Economy Needs 'Sensible Rebalancing,' Not 'Pitchforks' - that's a lie, fellas.  That's not what he said, and that's not what he meant.  And now ya know one more reason so many thousands of us stopped sending in our nickels and dimes.

Jan 16, 2014

You Are Not So Smart

Another one I stumbled across yesterday:

The Narrative Bias --David McRaney


You Are Not So Smart is a blog I started to explore self delusion. Like lots of people, I used to forward sensational news stories without skepticism and think I was a smarty pants just because I did a little internet research. Little did I know about confirmation bias and self-enhancing fallacies, and once I did, I felt very, very stupid. I still feel that way, but now I can make you feel that way too.
Here is how the blog started: One week, I saw both the Derren Brown person swap and the Invisible Gorilla videos on YouTube, and they blew my mind. Also, at that time, I was marathoning Penn and Teller’s Bullshit! on DVD. I felt like there was a common thread in all of that, something about how flawed perception and reasoning goes unnoticed because we are all so unwittingly overconfident. It reminded me of the experiments that seemed to stir up the most conversation in class when I was taking lots of college psychology courses, and it all just clicked. That would make a cool blog.