human programming is a matter of family, education, & experience
psychoanalysis & law enforcement make up the debugging effort
Jul 26, 2021
Today's Tweet
There must be 248 jillion memes and metaphors to choose from on this one.
oh my god I feel so much for this stick bug pic.twitter.com/TBactIFf91
— fangmeli (@pangmeli) July 25, 2021
COVID-19 Update
Yesterday, July 25th, 2021
6,900 people were killed by COVID-19
99.7 % of them were not vaccinated
World
New Cases: 428,279 (⬆︎ .22%)
New Deaths: 6,900 (⬆︎ .17%)
USA
New Cases: 13,818 (⬆︎ .04%)
New Deaths: 49 (⬆︎ .008%)
USA Vaccination Scorecard
At Least One Dose: 188.5 million (56.8%)
Fully Vaxxed: 163.0 million (49.1%)
So now it becomes a battle between the normal people and the deadhead idiots - same ol' same ol'.
Fortunately - for now - I think our side is starting to win.
I think people just want to get on with their lives, and more of us are starting to understand that that doesn't happen as long as we've got a 30% chunk of the population behaving like spoiled children melting down in the checkout line because mommy won't spend the grocery budget on chocolate milk and Ding Dongs.
Jul 25, 2021
Wrangling
I'll start with the conclusion and work my way back:
Qevin McQarthy is bad at his job.
NBC News:
Liz Cheney's role on Jan. 6 committee grows after GOP pulls participation
Democrats working with the Wyoming representative have high praise for her work as the committee’s lone Republican.
In May, Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., was stripped of her role as the third-ranking Republican in the House by fellow party members who said they had tired of her frequent and vocal opposition to former President Donald Trump’s false claims of massive election fraud, as well as her vote to impeach him for inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
Just two months later, Cheney’s stature is rising again, this time as the lone Republican on the House select committee charged with investigating that Jan. 6 attack. While her participation has triggered more attacks from Trump and others within her own party, she’s drawing strong reviews from Democrats who praise her work ethic and contributions to the committee thus far.
After Cheney was appointed by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to the committee, her role was always meant to send a message of bipartisanship. But when House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., pulled his own Republican appointees this week, Cheney’s role as the sole GOP member has only grown, Democratic aides and lawmakers told NBC News.
She may not be alone for long — Pelosi said Sunday she will try to add another Trump critic, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., to the panel in an effort to bulk up Republican participation — but her role will still be distinct.
“She will definitely have an elevated role and an amplified voice,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the select committee, said in an interview.
He said Cheney speaks for millions of Americans, including Republicans, who are looking for answers to many lingering questions about Jan. 6. “She comes in with a lot of credibility and legitimacy,” he said.
Cheney remains a steadfast opponent of House Democrats on most fronts as well as a vocal and frequent critic of President Joe Biden’s policy agenda, including major issues of taxes, immigration, abortion, national security and government spending.
But she has joined the Democrats on the Jan. 6 committee seamlessly, those members say, gaining trust that is rarely found across the political aisle, especially after the attack on the Capitol. She attends Zoom and in-person preparation meetings and has displayed an impressive level of commitment, knowledge and a “ferocious” work ethic.
“If you close your eyes, in our meetings, our Zooms, you wouldn't be able to distinguish which voice she was,” committee member Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., said. “That's the truth. We're all talking about next steps and process and what we want to get out of this, and she's been a committed partner in that.”
The members have also been in regular contact through a group text established by the panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss. One Democratic member called her “brilliant.”
“In the meetings that we've had thus far, she is very determined to get to the truth, and operates in a very no-nonsense fashion,” Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said of Cheney.
She has joined the group for two meetings in Pelosi’s office and spoken with her on the phone at least once, when Pelosi offered her a position on the committee. Cheney accepted the position but told Pelosi she couldn’t go to the news conference announcing the picks because she had to take her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, to the doctor, a source familiar with the conversation said.
Before Jan. 6, it would have been unimaginable to think that the most powerful Democrat in Congress, known for her political prowess and progressive résumé, would tap a deeply conservative, politically astute and Teflon-tough Republican politician who also happens to be the daughter of a vice president that Democrats bitterly battled for decades.
But the interests of the two women have merged with their public insistence that vital questions about the attack on their place of work must still be answered.
That connection was strengthened this week when Cheney came to Pelosi’s defense after the speaker refused to accept two of McCarthy’s committee selections — Reps. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Jim Banks, R-Ind. — with Cheney insisting the investigation “must go forward” and declaring she is “absolutely dedicated and committed to making sure that this investigation holds those accountable who did this and ensures that it never happens again.”
“She resonated with Speaker Pelosi this week because both of them are, you know, women in a male-dominated profession who are not going to be pushed around,” Raskin said.
Pelosi’s rejection of the two Republicans is what led to McCarthy pulling all of his appointees, forgoing GOP representation, except for Cheney.
Pelosi even toasted Cheney. In one meeting with the committee members, Pelosi raised a glass of water, saying, “Let us salute Liz Cheney for her courage.”
Raskin, a constitutional lawyer and professor, and Cheney have vastly different perspectives about constitutional law and issues of war and the role of government. But they, too, have found common ground.
Raskin said that during a recent phone conversation between the two, Cheney asked him a question about First Amendment law on behalf of her son who is entering law school. Raskin, who lost his son, who was also in law school, to suicide this past winter, said he’s going to work on the answer this weekend and that the discussion touched him.
“I'm somebody who completely mixes my political life and commitments with my family life,” Raskin said. “Our kids have always been part of what we're doing, and I think that, you know, her kids are also very much on her mind and in her heart during this time.”
Her district went for Trump by almost 44 points, while Raskin’s district went for Biden by more than 40.
Cheney has already put her stamp on the committee. She has requested that a Republican adviser be hired and has requested former Virginia Rep. Denver Riggleman, a source familiar with the committee’s discussions said. Riggleman was defeated in a primary during the 2020 election cycle and has since gathered extensive research on extremism.
“I think she brings a very important perspective, and I think she brings a conservative stature and pedigree that will be valued,” Schiff said of Cheney.
Because the committee is still in the beginning stages, its members have not yet divvied up roles or assignments. But members point to her background in national security as an asset in helping understand domestic terrorism and extremism.
Unsurprisingly, Republican members have distanced themselves from her as an outlier in the GOP.
“I think she’s put herself on a little bit of an island,” Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, said of Cheney.
But living in House Republican exile seems to be her only punishment for the time being. McCarthy had earlier warned his members that anyone taking a select committee post from Pelosi could be putting their other committee assignments at risk. So far he has not acted on that threat.
Asked how Republicans should interact with Cheney, McCarthy said, “The way we interact with any Democrat in the process.”
Cheney’s participation is unlikely to win her further support among Republican voters. Trump has made his desire to see her defeated in a GOP primary clear, and at least a half-dozen Republicans in Wyoming have stated their intention to run. But she’s raised more than $3 million for her re-election bid since Jan. 6 and members of the committee say she seems undeterred.
“Liz Cheney feels the urgency of this task in her bones,” Raskin said. “She was there on Jan. 6, and she has not suppressed her memories of profound danger.”
So first, McQarthy goes after Cheney by helping the wingnuts vote her out of their conference leadership, which puts her in the position of being the only House Republican with any credibility to talk about honor, and standing for the constitution and the rule of law.
Oops 1
Then he whips his conference to vote against passing the resolution for a joint bicameral committee, which hands all the power to Pelosi.
Oops 2
Then he poison pills his guys for the House Select Committee that Pelosi is putting together - pretending he was just trying to send his best members - which, for now, leaves Cheney the only Republican in the room during the hearings, which promise to be fiery and damning (especially for anybody who chose not to be represented).
Oops 3.
And now Cheney is the only Republican with any real visibility who's talking about the actual policy choices and goals that the GOP has always held to. McQarthy put her up there, and that's basically him showing himself the door.
Oops 4 - and out.
Today's Reddit
Best thing I've seen a very long time - more lie this one please.
And what is it about Rand Paul and hair? You see the wig on that woman?
Today's Tweet
All the truth in one tweet
Kentucky Fried Chicken still ain't told you what the eleven herbs and spices are, but you still eat that shit. So why y'all getting all funny-style over getting vaccinated?
— Corey Richardson (@vexedinthecity) July 24, 2021
COVID-19 Update
Yesterday, July 24th, 2021
8,264 people were killed by COVID-19
99.75 % of them were not vaccinated
World
New Cases: 491,729 (⬆︎ .25%)
New Deaths: 8,264 (⬆︎ .20%)
USA
New Cases: 36,779 (⬆︎ .10%)
New Deaths: 151 (⬆︎ .02%)
USA Vaccination Scorecard
At Least One Dose: 188.0 million (56.6%)
Fully Vaxxed: 162.7 million (49.0%)
So, today I learned that yes indeed, there are Alpha, Beta, and Gamma variants to the current COVID-19 Alpha monster. I guess I assumed as much, since we're taking about Delta - I just didn't know it until today, when I read through this piece in WaPo:
The lambda variant of the novel coronavirus has received a flurry of news coverage since it was added to the World Health Organization variant watch list in June. Lambda swept through several South American countries earlier this year and has been detected in some U.S. states, including this week at a major hospital in Houston.
Infectious-disease experts in the United States aren’t sounding any alarms about lambda yet. Its progress here has been slow, with fewer than 700 cases identified since it emerged in the country months ago. Moreover, experts say the threat from lambda is insignificant next to the highly transmissible delta variant, which is spreading rapidly among unvaccinated people and causing hospitalizations to spike for the first time in months.
“It is not anywhere near as concerning as the delta variant,” said S. Wesley Long, medical director of diagnostic microbiology at Houston Methodist Hospital, which on Monday reported its first case of the lambda variant. “That’s the engine that’s going to be driving the surge in the U.S.”
Still, scientists are studying the lambda variant, which has shown signs of being more transmissible than milder versions of the coronavirus. Here’s what you need to know about it.
What is the lambda variant?
The lambda variant, also known as C.37, is an emerging version of the novel coronavirus that was first detected in Peru in August 2020. It has since spread rapidly in that country, where it now accounts for the vast majority of new cases.
At least 29 countries have reported lambda in recent months, most in relatively small numbers. Chile, Argentina and Ecuador have seen the most significant increases outside of Peru, according to the WHO.
The spread of lambda in South America led the WHO to designate it a “variant of interest” on June 14. That means scientists have identified genetic changes that could make it more dangerous than earlier versions of the virus.
According to experts, lambda has some of the same types of mutations observed in the alpha, beta and gamma variants that may increase transmission. It also has a mutation similar to one found in delta that may allow it to more easily infect lung cells.
But lambda isn’t yet considered a “variant of concern" by the WHO. The agency reserves that label for variants that have been shown more definitively to spread faster, make people sicker, or evade vaccines or treatments. That group includes the alpha, beta, gamma and delta variants.
How big of a concern is the lambda variant in the United States?
Experts are generally confident that the lambda variant won’t erupt in the United States the way it did in Peru, which already had the world’s highest covid-19 mortality.
Lambda has quietly circulated for months in the United States without taking off. By comparison, the delta variant was first identified in the United States in March and now accounts for more than 80 percent of new infections over the past two weeks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“What’s going on here in the U.S. is lambda is competing against the delta variant. And I think it’s losing the competition,” said Peter Stoilov, an associate professor of biochemistry at West Virginia University who studies the coronavirus variants. “The question is how competitive this variant is going to be. I don’t see it spreading anywhere near as fast as the delta.”
Experts also emphasized that the lambda variant was just one among many.
“It doesn’t really make the situation any worse,” said Nathaniel Landau, a microbiologist at New York University who studies the variants. “It’s just more of the same.”
How effective are vaccines against the lambda variant?
Even if the lambda variant were to surge in the United States, there’s good news: Two of the three federally approved coronavirus vaccines appear to work well against it.
A paper posted Monday by Landau and other researchers at NYU found that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines had no problem neutralizing lambda. The variant showed a slight resistance to the two mRNA vaccines, but the shots were still highly effective, according to the study, which has not yet undergone peer review.
“The vaccines induce such good antibodies that even if the virus is a little bit resistant, they are still quite sufficient to kill the virus,” Landau said.
The Johnson & Johnson vaccine, on the other hand, doesn’t offer the same defenses against lambda or delta, the researchers found.
Still, Landau was quick to point out that the Johnson & Johnson vaccine offered other benefits, including its ability to help the body’s T cells fight infection.
“There’s no reason to think that the T cell response isn’t as good,” he said. “It would still be there to block variant viruses.”
Experts stressed that vaccines were the most important tool for combating the coronavirus, regardless of the variant. Long, of Houston Methodist, said people now have a choice: either get vaccinated or, eventually, get infected.
“No matter what Greek letter comes along next, the vaccine is really our best defense,” Long said. “If anybody thinks they can hunker down and never get the virus, I think that’s a fantasy.”
Jul 24, 2021
Podcast
It's the Opposites Game.
In line with the basic tenet of authoritarians - lying about everything - no matter what it is or how trivial it seems - in order to condition us to accept having our reality dictated to us.
And,,,
Daddy State Awareness Rule 4
They change the meaning of words to suit their needs.
a) if it's false but it works in my favor, then it's true
b) if it's true but it works against me, then it's false
Mail a check payable to:
The Professional Left Podcast
PO Box 9133
Springfield, IL 62791-9133
Today's Reddit
Spotted at a depth of more than 2,500 feet by scientists aboard the Schmidt Ocean Institute’s research vessel Falkor in July 2021.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)