George Santos ends comeback bid for Congress after raising no money
byu/Original_Dogmeat innottheonion
Showing posts with label reddit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reddit. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Today's Reddit
Social media is chock-full of good news tonight.
Monday, April 22, 2024
Pushback
Christian pastor has had enough of politics being brought into the church
byu/Romano16 inPublicFreakout
Sunday, April 21, 2024
Today's Reddit
If I had the money, this would be on every highway in every red state.
Trump killed border security
byu/santuccie indemocrats
Monday, March 04, 2024
Thursday, February 15, 2024
Wednesday, February 07, 2024
Today's Reddit
If there's a "positive" to any of this, it's the question of veracity. Trying not to be either cynical or naive, I still think the probability is fairly high that most of these idiots are pulling these stunts, and coming out with all this badass rhetoric because they know if they play to the idiot voters who say this is what they want, they can get a pretty decent government gig out of it.
They can pretend to be Ron Swanson for a while.
MAGA Nazi Karen burns LGBTQ books with a flamethrower in her campaign ad, running for GOP Secretary of State of Missouri
byu/GrizzlyBearAttack inPublicFreakout
Monday, January 29, 2024
Friday, January 26, 2024
Today's Reddit
Meanwhile, over at r/Conservative (AKA: Reddit Law School), the deep-thinking scholars are deeply thinking.
Jury rules Trump must pay $83,000,000 in damages for defaming E. Jean Carroll
level 2
The court has fined him. They won't make him pay anything. It will never survive appeal. He'll end up suing her for court costs and he'll win, just like he did against the porn star.
133
level 2
She could be a literal pigeon
TBF, that's a tiny distinction, she is a loon.
Same as the Kavanaugh accusers. Zero evidence, just a claim, and one brought to court at times calculated to do as much political harm as possible.
Also, that this can happen in civil courts at all is an abomination.
They have a lower threshold of evidence, but it is not supposed to be absolutely zero. It is a travesty, as is people acting like it is a criminal conviction.
Clown world.
28
level 1
I mean, no evidence that he assaulted her and they found him guilty. Then they found him liable for damages and set the amount insanely high. Surely anyone who's not a deranged Trump hater can see this is all punitive from judges who are putting politics first?
41
level 2
It is, but the issue was Trump’s defense or lack thereof. In the original trial he didn’t give a testimony, it was just his disposition. And his argument that he didn’t rape her was “he didn’t find her attractive”. Jean Carroll’s attorney’s pointed out he confused his ex-wife with Jean Carroll and he considers her ex-wife attractive. So trump entire defense was immediately destroyed. It’s essentially a he said, she said issue, and while both said some pretty questionable things, both Trump and his attorney clearly fumbled the trial.
Vote
level 2
All his other trials are gonna go the same way too. Politics have replaced justice in our courts.
0
level 1
Trump raped me in 1973. Never mind the fact that I was born in 1986, facts clearly don’t matter. Here is how I see it playing out:
Me: Trump raped me in 1973.
Trump: I wouldn’t rape JTuck, he’s disgusting and a man.
Me: defamation!!!!!! And he assumed my gender!!!!
Court: here is $83m of Trump’s money.
155
level 2
Alex Jones knows something about comically large numbers when it comes to litigations
2
level 1
What makes zero sense to me is that they are making him pay this for saying she's lying about him raping her.
Something she cannot prove happened.
22
level 2
level 1
So I can just say anyone raped me and if they deny it I can sue for defamation?
Or is it only if I say a conservative raped me in NYC?
4
level 1
level 1
What a joke. Zero evidence and it’s obvious this woman is a loon. I’m not a fan of Trump, but this was a total sham cooked up by democrats. They don’t even try to hide it at all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)