Showing posts with label reddit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reddit. Show all posts

Oct 28, 2024

Today's Reddit


Hopefully, everybody's heard about it by now, but I feel the need to document it for myself.

Yes - they're bigoted exclusionist assholes, and they're not even trying to hide it now.

They've gone from dog whistle to klaxon to fog horn to skywriting and fireworks. What more do we need?
Tony Hinchcliffe at the Trump rally today in New York City, he plays it off as a joke but it’s what they all want to hear
byu/Odlavso inPublicFreakout

Aug 11, 2024

What They Want


These people aren't concerned, and raising the alarm. They're not just worried that something bad will happen.

They're hoping for it. They're willing to take part in it, and to help start it.

"Are you concerned if Trump loses, that there will be another Jan. 6?".."No..""I think there will be civil war"
byu/ombx inPublicFreakout

Feb 7, 2024

Today's Reddit


The history is that it'll eventually wither and die, but not before lots and lots of people get hurt and killed. And there's always been a necessity for people to sacrifice themselves in the fight against this crap.

If there's a "positive" to any of this, it's the question of veracity. Trying not to be either cynical or naive, I still think the probability is fairly high that most of these idiots are pulling these stunts, and coming out with all this badass rhetoric because they know if they play to the idiot voters who say this is what they want, they can get a pretty decent government gig out of it.

Jan 26, 2024

Today's Reddit


Meanwhile, over at r/Conservative (AKA: Reddit Law School), the deep-thinking scholars are deeply thinking.

Jury rules Trump must pay $83,000,000 in damages for defaming E. Jean Carroll

OP·4 hr. ago
Beltway Republican

A New York jury, of course they’d make him pay that loon. She could be a literal pigeon and they’d rule against Trump.

186
User avatar
level 2
·4 hr. ago
Constitutional Originalist

The court has fined him. They won't make him pay anything. It will never survive appeal. He'll end up suing her for court costs and he'll win, just like he did against the porn star.

133
User avatar
level 2

This is absolutely dead on appeal. Biased as hell jury.

58
User avatar
level 2

She could be a literal pigeon

TBF, that's a tiny distinction, she is a loon.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/766067/anderson-cooper-cuts-to-commercial-after-trump-accuser-e-jean-carroll-calls-rape-sexy/

Same as the Kavanaugh accusers. Zero evidence, just a claim, and one brought to court at times calculated to do as much political harm as possible.

Also, that this can happen in civil courts at all is an abomination.

They have a lower threshold of evidence, but it is not supposed to be absolutely zero. It is a travesty, as is people acting like it is a criminal conviction.

Clown world.

28
User avatar
level 1
·45 min. ago
Conservative

I mean, no evidence that he assaulted her and they found him guilty. Then they found him liable for damages and set the amount insanely high. Surely anyone who's not a deranged Trump hater can see this is all punitive from judges who are putting politics first?

41
User avatar
level 2
·9 min. ago
Jeffersonian

It is, but the issue was Trump’s defense or lack thereof. In the original trial he didn’t give a testimony, it was just his disposition. And his argument that he didn’t rape her was “he didn’t find her attractive”. Jean Carroll’s attorney’s pointed out he confused his ex-wife with Jean Carroll and he considers her ex-wife attractive. So trump entire defense was immediately destroyed. It’s essentially a he said, she said issue, and while both said some pretty questionable things, both Trump and his attorney clearly fumbled the trial.

Vote
User avatar
level 2
·12 min. ago
Conservative

All his other trials are gonna go the same way too. Politics have replaced justice in our courts.

0
User avatar
level 1
·4 hr. ago
Small Government

Trump raped me in 1973. Never mind the fact that I was born in 1986, facts clearly don’t matter. Here is how I see it playing out:

Me: Trump raped me in 1973.

Trump: I wouldn’t rape JTuck, he’s disgusting and a man.

Me: defamation!!!!!! And he assumed my gender!!!!

Court: here is $83m of Trump’s money.

155
User avatar
level 2
·2 hr. ago
Conservative

1973? Are you sure you want to get that specific?

30
User avatar
level 1
·2 hr. ago
Trump 2024

This is such a joke. And what a comically large number. Might as well of said “Trump owes a gajillion dollars”. And there’s no proof this even happened….

54
User avatar
level 2
·40 min. ago
Conservative Jedi Knight

Alex Jones knows something about comically large numbers when it comes to litigations

2
User avatar
level 1
·4 hr. ago
TRUMP 2024

83M for someone no ones ever heard of. Hope she doesn't get a dime of it.

64
User avatar
level 2
·3 hr. ago
Conservative

Someone who on an interview said "Rape is sexy"

35
User avatar
level 1

What makes zero sense to me is that they are making him pay this for saying she's lying about him raping her.

Something she cannot prove happened.

22
User avatar
level 1

Who?

8
User avatar
level 2
·3 hr. ago
Canadian Conservative
User avatar
level 1

So I can just say anyone raped me and if they deny it I can sue for defamation?

Or is it only if I say a conservative raped me in NYC?

4
User avatar
level 1
·3 hr. ago
Constitutional Conservative
User avatar
level 1
·1 hr. ago
Moderate Conservative

Trump seems like the best possible choice for the Republican party !

2
User avatar
level 2

As a moderate/center left republican, i agree!

-1
User avatar
level 1
·3 hr. ago·edited 2 hr. ago
Trump Conservative
User avatar
level 1
·37 min. ago
Moderate Conservative

What a joke. Zero evidence and it’s obvious this woman is a loon. I’m not a fan of Trump, but this was a total sham cooked up by democrats. They don’t even try to hide it at all.