Dec 19, 2017

Fantasyland


I worked at Disney World a million years ago when it first opened. My shift would end an hour or so after the park had closed, and when the weather was nice, sometimes I'd walk down "Main Street", past the Hall Of Presidents. 

When it's dark out, and all the lights are still on, but there are no people and no sounds except your own footfalls, the word "spooky" comes to mind - which is nowhere near the best descriptor now that 45*'s in there.

This helps though:

PS) We need to take every opportunity to mock that prick while it's still legal.

Dec 18, 2017

What We've Always Suspected

...even known to a certain extent. Now we get further confirmation.

IBT headline:

Senator Bob Corker Said He Hasn’t Read The Tax Bill, Denies Changing His Vote In Exchange For Personal Tax Breaks


Josh Keefe and David Sirota:


In a series of rapid-fire telephone interviews, Corker asked IBT for a description of the provision, and then criticized it. But minutes later, he called back to walk back that criticism, saying he wanted to further study the issue, and that it was more complex than he initially understood it to be. Despite potentially holding the fate of the entire tax bill in his hands, Corker told IBT that he has only read a short summary of the $1.4 trillion legislation.

“I had like a two-page summary I went through with leadership,” said Corker. “I never saw the actual text.” Despite not reading the bill -- and having time to read it before the final vote scheduled for this week -- he reiterated his support for the bill to IBT, support he announced hours before bill’s full text was publicly released on Friday.

Corker called IBT to respond to a series of IBT investigative reports showing that he switched his vote to “yes” on the tax legislation, only after Republican leaders added in a provision reducing taxes on income from real-estate LLCs. Federal records reviewed by IBT show Corker, a commercial real estate mogul, made up to $7 million last year from such income. President Donald Trump's financial disclosures listed between $41 million and $68 million of the same income. 

After the report, Corker called IBT and asked for a detailed description of the provision, insisting he did not know about. After the provision was described, he said: “If I understand what [the provision] does, it sounds totally unnecessary and borderline ridiculous.”

A few minutes later, however, Corker called back, and tried to back off that criticism.



So, it seems we get to decide which is worse - Corker trading his vote for personal gain, or that he doesn't know what's in the bill he says he's going to vote for.


At first blush - What the fuck is wrong with these people!?!

The only ray of hope here is that maybe Corker (and Collins, et all) are just stringing them along(?), and they plan on torpedoing the bill, as well as their fucked up leadership, and and and.

Here's an idea, disgruntled Repubs - switch sides.  Or at least caucus with the Dems for a while.

Or better yet - if you're going to trade your votes, trade them for some Honest-to-Pete Campaign Finance Reform.

The problems associated with Corker being so totally in the dark about this legislation are not limited to Bob Corker. Nobody seems to know what's in these things anymore, especially when Repubs are running the joint.

And I think it's because Congress Critters are over-worked. Not over-worked because they spend so much time and energy getting prepped and up to speed on bills and resolutions and stuff (they obviously aren't), but because they have to expend the majority for their efforts on the phones trying to raise enough money to get re-elected. That's an old one, but I think we're seeing a shitload of confirming evidence.

They have to find ways to put more hours into the day.  So basically, they're outsourcing (this is also an oldie but a goodie).  They "hire" staffers from the Lobbying firms or from the industry groups themselves, and hand the project over to them while their office management team oversees the thing - Management Staffers, btw, also often hired from the business interests they're supposed to be policing.

So weirdly, 45* and Bannon are right in saying "The Swamp" and "Deep State", but they're pointing at the wrong people. The professionals doing the real work of governance aren't the problem. The real problem lies in the process whereby we put people in charge of the government who're trying really hard to drive the rank-n-file bureaucracy (the parts that actually work) into the same fucked up swamp as the White House and Congress.

And while I'm at it, Grover Norquist is right too - unfortunately, he's got way too many people supporting his efforts to drown the wrong goddamned thing in that bathtub.

Remember though - it ain't easy. It's complicated and twisted and confusing; and for every difficult gnarly problem there's a solution that's simple and elegant and wrong.

But if we start with the money, the rest of gets a little smoother.

Whooda Thunk It

Jeremy Scahill can be a bit of a sensationalist, but he's always been careful to back up his reporting with solid evidence.

That said, remember that people lie; and sometimes they lie for good reasons; and sometimes good reporters - and good government - get fooled.

The Nation:

Former Blackwater employee and an ex-US Marine who has worked as a security operative for the company have made a series of explosive allegations in sworn statements filed on August 3 in federal court in Virginia. The two men claim that the company’s owner, Erik Prince, may have murdered or facilitated the murder of individuals who were cooperating with federal authorities investigating the company. The former employee also alleges that Prince “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe,” and that Prince’s companies “encouraged and rewarded the destruction of Iraqi life.”

In their testimony, both men also allege that Blackwater was smuggling weapons into Iraq. One of the men alleges that Prince turned a profit by transporting “illegal” or “unlawful” weapons into the country on Prince’s private planes. They also charge that Prince and other Blackwater executives destroyed incriminating videos, emails and other documents and have intentionally deceived the US State Department and other federal agencies. The identities of the two individuals were sealed out of concerns for their safety.

We're in a very odd place right now. I'm not saying Erik Prince isn't the smarmy TheoCon asshole zealot he appears to be - I think he is.

I'm saying there are at least 4 probables here.
  1. This is an effort to discredit Blackwater because somebody's pushing back against Prince's continuing efforts to privatize US Military and Intel functions
  2. It could be a Counter-Ops False Flag thing where Blackwater funds an attack on itself, hoping to stir up lots of negativity, only to have it revealed that they didn't do the evil deed, which reverses the negative and gets lots of good sympathetic PR for them
  3. Opportunists looking for a payday
  4. Blackwater's guilty as fuck, and this is the only way we can think of to take them down that doesn't leave "the good guys" open to similar charges.
The oddness of this place has grown out of the "conservative" War On Facts that has intensified over the last 25 years to the point that we're in this weird deadlock because a boatload of us are stuck in a state of Radical Skepticism.

If you don't like the way it's going, just deny the facts. And if pressed, you can always pull an alternative "reality" straight outa your ass.



And yeah - it's all pretty fucked up, but that's not an excuse to do nothing.

Dec 16, 2017

Today's Tweet



Miss Lonelyheart waxes pathetic

 

Dec 15, 2017

Timing Is Everything



And watch your 6 - apparently nobody else will.

 

How Great I Art

Much appreciation to Albemarle Dems, and to whoever posted this from their Twitter feed.


...and to Walker Thornton for all she does for your favorite blogger.

It's Brookings

...and Brookings is "left leaning", but that don't make 'em wrong.

Like Colbert said: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

(I just wish this kind of stuff could come from an author with a name other than Looney, y'know?)

Anyway:

THE ISSUE: House and Senate Republicans are working on a tax bill that will overhaul several parts of the U.S. tax code. By introducing new complexities to the tax code, the new bill creates tax sheltering opportunities for many Americans, especially the wealthy and those with good financial advisers.

- the first 3 points -
  • By taxing wage income and business income at different levels, the bill adds complexity to the tax code and creates many new opportunities for more sophisticated and well-advised taxpayers to reduce their tax burdens.
  • One of the least desirable parts of the bill is a provision that allows pass-through business owners to deduct 23 percent of their income before they calculate their taxes. This would result in very large differences in the tax burden of taxpayers in very similar circumstances.
  • For example, if a plumber makes $60,000 a year as wages paid by an employer, he or she will pay 60 percent more in income taxes than if that plumber had been a sole proprietor or self-employed and takes advantage of the pass-through rate.
  • The most sophisticated taxpayers and the highest income taxpayers will have a multiplicity of choices about how to structure their income and businesses in order to reduce taxes the most.

But let's get really real - if these jokers wanted to cut taxes for working families, they'd be  doing exactly that.  It's not about "relief", and anybody living within driving distance of a smart phone knows that.

It's also not about simplifying the Tax Code - not when it installs new ways for Corporations to avoid paying their fair share, which only increases an already pretty severe slant against the Workin' Guy.

These jagoffs are setting a deficit time bomb that they'll be using as the excuse they need to dismantle the main economic safety features which, for a good 80 years, have proven essential to making sure we have a properly-functioning middle class.

Paul Ryan has already tipped his hand by saying 2018 is when they'll be taking a nice big whack at Medicare.

We'll see what happens with Ryan. Rumors about his probable departure have intensified of late, but that could easily be a shot at gaining a bit more leverage - dunno. There are so many flips and turns and double-, triple-, and fourple-crossing that goes on, it's not really possible to keep up.

As always, the sausage-making continues apace.

Today's Pix

Click on a pic
















Dec 14, 2017

Today's GIF

FCC spokes-critter answers the public outcry:

Sorry For The Delay

...but we were waiting for confirmation.

Here's another live shot of the skies over Alabama yesterday.

The Web


Ajit Pai is a lyin' sack of shit.  Net Neutrality is the deregulated internet. This jackass wants to deliver it into the hands of privateers and rent-seekers.


First - fuck you, Mr Pai. The web is absolutely vital to people who are just trying to get on in their everyday lives. (eg) It's nearly impossible now to apply for a job without internet access. Killing Net Neutrality translates into people having to pay for the privilege of looking for a job. Obviously, there's a cost to it now, but your "deregulation" opens it up to massive potential for abuse.

How do we know this "Plan To Restore Internet Freedom" is bogus? The name. When these assholes are selling something that's aimed at fucking us with our pants on, they give it a name that's exactly the opposite of what happens if they put it into practice.

The Clear Skies Act: allowed for massive increases in air pollutants.

The Clean Water Act: raised the allowable amounts of things like arsenic in drinking water. 

The Healthy Forests Initiative: opened protected Public Lands to logging - including clear-cutting in certain cases.

When we deregulated banking the 1st time in the 80s, we got the Savings & Loan crisis.

Deregulating the airlines - are there more air carriers now? Do they offer better service at a lower price?

How 'bout electric utilities? I seem to recall something called Enron.

Deregulating banks again in the 90s gave us a near-total collapse of the world economy, and a "recession" that we're still stuck in.

When 45* fucked up Bears Ears recently, his closing pitch was "protecting our precious resources".

We don't protect our resources by handing them over to private mining interests.

It's the game of opposites.

And by the way:

  • Uranium deposits in Utah (Bears Ears)
  • Pimping the Uranium One scandal
  • Hillary Clinton gave away 20% of our precious uranium supply!?!
  • We must do something to compensate
  • I know - we'll sell off some of the National Monuments for peanuts and let a few rich guys get a lot richer at tax-payer expense
  • Yeah - that's the ticket
As stoopid and incompetent as Cult45 is, there's a whole school of very adept sharks and flocks of talented vultures cashing in.

Dec 12, 2017

Today's Tweet



The ones who show up get to make the decisions.

So show up or shut up.



Turnout was not all that great, but it looks like Dems - especially WOC - made the difference.

Way To Go 'Bama

Looks like Doug Jones has pulled it off.


Alabama's Secretary of State is a guy named John Merrill. Mr Merrill goes to observe elections in Russia, and pronounces them 'free and fair'.

What the fuck is it with these assholes and Russia!?!

Anyway, the in-person voting was solid enough to make the absentees not such a big deal, but let's not forget or underestimate the GOP's capacity for rat-fucking.

It's Late

...but I'm hoping against hope that Doug Jones pulls it off.

Cuz too many of these fuckin' goobers really are just that stoopid.