Showing posts with label markets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label markets. Show all posts

Mar 13, 2026

Today's SNAFU

Markets hate uncertainty.



Panic-stricken markets are losing faith in Donald Trump

The president’s contradictory statements on the Iran war have sent trading into chaos


In roughly 14 years of trading oil, including during the pandemic when crude prices briefly went negative, Greg Newman has never seen a market like this.

“It’s almost a broken market. People don’t know what to do,” the chief executive of Onyx Commodities says.

Onyx employs 60 traders across London, Dubai and Singapore who buy and sell oil contracts covering things such as crude oil and jet fuel. They trade with everyone from oil producers to trading houses and hedge funds, helping the market flow.

Knowing which way prices are going is a key part of the job: buy high and sell low and you’ll soon be out of business.

Yet working out where oil will go as war rages in the Middle East has proved unusually difficult.

Past crises also saw wild swings in the price of oil but the big physical trading houses, which have vast control over oil flows and the hedge funds that have become increasingly prominent players were still largely in control.

This time, it’s different. The reason? Donald Trump, the US president.

Oil has been sensitive to Trump’s comments about the US war in Iran. Yet his view of it seems to change hour by hour.

As oil futures began to trade in Asia on Sunday night, prices surged close to $120 a barrel as the US president said expensive fuel was a “small price to pay” for world peace.

Yet by Monday afternoon, Trump was saying the war in Iran was “very complete, pretty much”, sending crude prices plummeting to below $90. It was the biggest daily swing in dollar terms on record.

Hours later, Trump threatened to hit Iran “20 times harder” if they blocked oil flows, prompting another rise in prices.

The course of the war matters hugely to oil prices. Around a fifth of the world’s supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow Gulf waterway shut by Iran since the conflict began.

The International Energy Agency has said the disruption is the biggest shock to supply in history.

Trump’s stream of often contradictory statements on the future of the war has left oil prices on a roller-coaster ride.

“This week, everyone in the industry feels like we’re in a washing machine on spin mode,” says Pierre Chapuis, the head of petroleum and green fuels trading at Axpo, Switzerland’s largest energy company. “You come home and put the TV on, and you watch live news. We’re constantly glued to our phones.”

He adds: “I was talking with some colleagues on the desk. We have the feeling that we’re binge-watching Netflix. You want to know what’s happening next.

“You know it is coming in imminently, and it will be unexpected. Eventually, you say it cannot be true, but it is. That’s a bit the way that we’re following the news [from the White House].”

‘Headlines remain unreliable’

The Trump administration has shown an extreme willingness to put downward pressure on the cost of oil, with rumours that the treasury department was even considering actively trading oil futures contracts in an effort to tame prices.

The president’s public statements on the war often appear to be part of that campaign, with Trump trying to talk down the price even as ships burn in the waters off Iran.

Yet the increasingly contradictory nature of his statements has left many questioning whether they can trust the messaging coming from the administration.

Prices whipsawed earlier in the week after Chris Wright, Trump’s energy secretary, posted on X that the US navy was escorting an oil tanker through the Strait of Hormuz, before promptly deleting the message.

The White House denied any escort shortly after and said the incident was an error. Yet, it didn’t stop Iran’s foreign minister from accusing the Trump administration of deliberate market manipulation.

“US officials are posting fake news to manipulate markets,” Seyed Abbas Araghchi posted on X. “It won’t protect them from inflationary tsunami they’ve imposed on Americans.”

Paul Gooden, the head of global natural resources at asset manager Ninety One, says a “PR battle” is raging over oil. While Trump insists prices will soon “drop very rapidly”, Iran is telling the world to brace for $200 a barrel.

“Headlines remain unreliable,” Tamas Varga, an analyst at PVM Oil Associates, part of the world’s largest energy and commodities broker, says. “Headlines remain very difficult to try to translate or interpret, but their impact ever since the Iranian crisis broke out is much larger than before.”

A trader at a London firm puts it more succinctly: “If you’re trading just on [headlines], you’re just gonna get f-----.”

Some of the world’s largest hedge funds and trading houses have found themselves caught offside. One hedge fund run by Caxton Associates reportedly lost at least $600m (£449m) in this month’s market upheaval.

Trafigura, one of the four largest commodity trading firms in the world, secured an extra $3bn banking facility to defend against any possible margin calls.

Hedge fund Citadel’s flagship Wellington fund lost 2pc last week, while Balyasny Asset Management dropped by 3.5pc. Two of its senior energy traders, Toby Sheppard and Max Iakovlev, left the firm last week, according to Bloomberg. A reason wasn’t given.

“They don’t know what’s going to happen, certainly minute to minute, but even day to day,” Newman says, referring to the hedge funds and trading houses. “So even they’re getting called out. Whereas clearly some people do know what’s going on. Political information and timely information is evidently everything.”

Some observers think they have the answer. Adam Kobeissi, a US analyst who runs an investment newsletter, claims to have identified Trump’s “conflict playbook”. It begins with intense pressure to strike a deal before rapid escalation and then de-escalation.

“One of the most overlooked elements of this strategy is the degree to which financial markets themselves become part of the negotiation environment,” the Kobeissi Letter, his X account, wrote earlier this month. “President Trump has consistently demonstrated awareness of equity market performance, energy prices, and inflation expectations as components of broader political optics.”

The US president’s sensitivity to markets led to speculation that “Taco” Trump could be returning earlier this week when he called a press conference in the wake of oil’s surge to $120. The “Taco” nickname – Trump always chickens out – came after he backed away from the worst of his trade war following a vicious market reaction.

Yet this time, Trump is trying to have his cake and eat it too. Asked at the Monday press conference whether the war was escalating or “very complete” as Trump had suggested, he replied: “You could say both.”

The result is confusion and significant volatility in oil.

‘Too much volatility is a killer’

Chapuis has traded oil for two decades. This week has been the most “intense” moment of his career.

“You’re so focused. We even forget about lunches and meetings,” he says.

The situation is far more complicated than previous periods of turmoil, such as the pandemic or Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

“This time, it’s so complex,” Chapuis says. “You have the Middle East, Israel, the States, then you have Europe that might step into it. Then you have Hormuz, then you have some fields that are shutting down.”

He adds: “We never had an environment that was as concentrated in terms of so many different events all over and all at once as what we have at the moment.”

He and his team buy and sell future contracts rather than physical oil barrels, providing producers, refiners and retailers with an ability to hedge against the risk of price swings.

Normally, having some movement in prices helps traders make money. But too much, and it can turn existential.

“Too much volatility is a killer. [It] can destroy the market,” says Chapuis.

When prices swing by as much as 30pc, it can trigger margin calls where banks that have lent people money to trade with ask for more capital to back up the position. Traders unable to do so risk getting wiped out, creating yet more volatility.

“The market volatility that we see right now is very unhealthy, especially when you’re talking about headline-driven swings that are confusing every market player,” Chapuis says.

“You have some funds that are used to manoeuvre more steady environments. And then all of a sudden, a black swan like this one happens, and it is very difficult for them then to manage it.”

Rumours are circulating in the City about entire teams being sacked on the spot after incurring big losses.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that price setters are struggling to provide accurate benchmarks for some of the world’s major oil grades. S&P Global Energy, better known as Platts, was forced to revise its methodology for its key Dubai oil price earlier this month after energy shipments through the Strait of Hormuz were brought to a halt.

The uncertainty has led some traders to draw back from the market, leading prices to become increasingly untethered from reality.

“You just see people just trying to get the bare minimum done,” Newman at Onyx Commodities in London says. “It’s gotten to the point where it’s not healthy for this market.”

Chapuis believes there is no point trying to chase Trump’s statements, given how contradictory they can be.

Instead, he relies on a network of analysts monitoring the situation in the Middle East and Iran around the clock. Then Chapuis and his team make calls and try to stick to them.

“You need to be very, very strict and disciplined. You need to go into a trade with a clear plan and stops,” he says.

That’s easier said than done. One oil trader who has been in the market for more than a decade says every moment away from his screens has become “pure stress and anxiety”.

“You don’t have any confidence that [Trump] knows what he wants to do,” he says.

The last two Sundays have seen him trade at his desk at his home in Kent when the oil markets open at 11pm, getting only a few hours’ sleep between 2am and 6am before trading throughout each weekday.

“It’s hard to trade with any confidence and have any strong belief in your trade because it can just change on the flip of a dime,” the oil trader adds.


Every time things appear calmer, something else happens. Often, it’s a message on Truth Social from the president.


Mar 5, 2026

More Uh-Oh




UBS downgrades the U.S. stock market. Here’s what has the investment bank worried
  • UBS downgraded U.S. equities, saying factors that powered years of outperformance are starting to fade.
  • The dollar risk is a central concern as the firm sees “asymmetric structural downside risks” to the greenback.
  • Another pillar of U.S. stock strength — corporate buybacks — is also losing its edge, the bank said.
UBS’ top equity strategist dialed back his view on U.S. stocks, citing mounting risks from a weakening dollar, stretched valuations and policy turbulence in Washington.

Andrew Garthwaite, head of global equity strategy at the investment bank, downgraded American equities to “benchmark” in a fully invested global equity portfolio, arguing that the factors that powered years of outperformance are starting to fade.

The dollar risk is a central concern, Garthwaite wrote. UBS forecasts the euro climbing to $1.22 by the end of the first quarter and sees “asymmetric structural downside risks” to the greenback. Historically, when the dollar’s trade-weighted index falls 10%, U.S. equities underperform by roughly 4% in unhedged terms, according to the bank.

Foreign markets are trouncing the U.S. this year as a weaker dollar and cheaper valuations draw capital overseas. The MSCI World ex-US index has gained about 8% in 2026, compared with the little changed performance for the S&P 500. 
Japan’s Nikkei 225 has rallied 17% year to date, while the Stoxx Europe 600 is up 7%, underscoring a sharp rotation away from American equities. U.S. stocks struggled again Friday as investors fretted over the potential downsides of the artificial intelligence build-out and persistent inflation at home.

Another pillar of U.S. stock strength — corporate buybacks — is also losing its edge, the bank said. The buyback yield in the U.S. is now only roughly on par with global peers, eroding what had been a key support for earnings per share growth and investor flows, UBS said. The combined shareholder yield from dividends and buybacks in the U.S. is now about half that of Europe, the bank said.

“The buybacks yield is no longer exceptional and this had been an important driver of funds flow, EPS and valuation,” Garthwaite wrote.

Valuations add to the unease. UBS calculates that the sector-adjusted price-earnings ratio for U.S. stocks is 35% above international peers, versus an average premium of about 4% since 2010. Roughly 60% of sectors trade not only at higher multiples than their global counterparts but also above their own historical premium, the strategist wrote.

Policy volatility under President Donald Trump is another headwind. This year has brought shifts in tariff policy, proposals to cap credit card interest rates, potential limits on private equity investment in housing, renewed scrutiny of drug pricing, and suggestions to curb dividends and buybacks for defense companies, UBS said.

Still, the noted strategist stopped short of turning outright bearish. Garthwaite said the U.S. economy and equities tend to benefit more than peers when markets are in the early phases of a potential bubble. The bank also expects artificial intelligence adoption to outpace most other major regions, with the possible exception of China, helping sustain earnings growth across key industries.

UBS strategist Sean Simonds set a year-end target of 7,500 for the S&P 500, compared with an average forecast of 7,629 among 14 top strategists, according to CNBC Pro’s strategist survey.

everything Trump touches
turns to shit

Feb 25, 2026

The A.I. bubble


There's an AI bubble growing by leaps and bounds. And while it may not crash and take whole sectors of the economy down with it, there will be a "correction" at some time.

If anybody knows how I might be able to short the thing, please let me know. The crash is more-or-less widely expected by about January 2027.


What they're saying about an AI bubble impacting credit markets

Credit investors have reportedly become increasingly concerned about the potential impact of an AI bubble on credit markets.

Bank of America (BAC) said Monday its January client survey showed that 23% viewed the emergence of an AI bubble as their No. 1 concern, up from 9% in its December survey, according to Bloomberg.

Here's what other bankers and analysts have been saying about the AI bubble threat.


Jamie Dimon, CEO, JPMorgan Chase (JPM):
“There’s always a surprise in a credit cycle,” Dimon said Monday, according to CNBC. “The surprise has often been which industry [is impacted]…you didn’t expect utilities and phone companies in ’08, ’09, and this time around, it might be software, because of AI.”

Dimon added he was concerned about a cycle at some point, which could result in a wave of borrower defaults.
“There will be a cycle one day … I don’t know what confluence of events will cause that cycle. My anxiety is high over it,” Dimon said. “I’m not assuaged by the fact that asset prices are high. In fact, I think that adds to the risk.”

Damir Tokic, Seeking Alpha analyst:
"In my opinion, the AI bubble burst with the Oracle (ORCL) earnings report on September 10th, 2025—that's when ORCL stock price spiked, reversed, and crashed," wrote Tokic earlier this month. "The first phase of the AI bubble burst was essentially a burst of the credit-driven infrastructure bubble—with Oracle as the poster child."

Tokic goes on to argue that the second phase of the AI bubble burst was the selloff in software stocks, which he expects to be followed by a broader decline.
"It's Phase Three that will cause a recession with the bubble burst—that's when the stock market will likely 'crash' like in 2000 and 2008. Phase Three will likely start when the unemployment rate starts rising, specifically due to AI-related job losses—and this will start happening over the next 6 months. In the meantime, markets will likely be volatile," Tokic added.

High Yield Investor, Seeking Alpha analyst:
"While mega-cap tech and software have been phenomenal investments in recent years, the market appears to be growing nervous about AI exposing and bursting bubbles in both, as software stands to be disrupted by AI, and mega-cap tech is sinking hundreds of billions of dollars into AI CapEx that may not deliver significant enough returns to justify the spending, thereby destroying shareholder capital," High Yield Investor wrote on Feb. 19.

"Instead, we think that conservatively positioned and heavily discounted software lenders, as well as dividend-paying AI infrastructure companies, are the best risk-adjusted ways to play this dual bubble-bursting threat," they added.