"Journalism"

And again - why are we allowing all the real journalism to happen on 1/2 hour cable shows?

I wouldn't mind one little bit if we broke up the Media Mega-Giants, but I'm not advocating for a plan to then prop them up as viable outlets. Business is business, and you can't mandate profitability.

This will probably be a fairly long slow process of evolving into a workable model, but it occurs to me that along with all the scary shit about Report-o-Bots and Digital Content Generators, one thing we could get from the techno-wizardry is some kind of a built-in Fact Check mechanism.  Right now, I can high-lite a word or a string of text (on my Mac), right-click on it and look it up in the dictionary, or Google it, or go to Wikipedia or whatever - the point being in this case that the same technology that gets us a problem can be used to help us solve that problem.

In the meantime, we need to keep on keepin' on by learning more about applied skepticism and critical thinking.  

Because, even tho there are a few signs of improvement, this shit will prob'ly just get weirder before it starts to get anywhere close to relaxed and groovy.

Press Poodle of the future

Something We Should Know

It's just about being made to think Da Gubmint is taking it away from me and giving it to somebody I think doesn't deserve it.  

We don't know shit and what makes that a bad thing is that we don't even wanna know that we don't know it.

Fareed Explains

Clearing It Up

(This is a bit of a redux)

Hillary "lied" like everybody "lies" - sometimes you say things that you meant one way and people hear them a completely different way.

And always always always remember that every agency in every department in every government at every level is both a constituency itself, and/or it's either prospecting for or looking to maintain a constituency for itself.  You're a client being served, or you're in service to a client, or you're both at the same time. Everybody. Everywhere.

James Comey came up thru the Bush DoJ (he was assigned to take over the investigation of Bill's pardon of Mark Rich), and is no fan of the Clintons.

But he knows enough to be more or less a straight shooter, and he's got some chops as a Bankster Buster even tho' he's been on the inside at Lockheed, Bridgewater, and HSBC.

A bit of an odd duck, and worth watching.

Anyway, he was obviously a little peeved at the whole spectacle, having the look of a guy who couldn't quite stomach all the political bullshit.  Or maybe he was just disappointed that Cartwright asked the right questions, leaving the Repubs with basically a handful of nuthin'.

We can still find reasons to hate on Hillary if we wanna, but we should prob'ly let go of that one.

Today's Pix

Here's The Plan

1. Drug Trump
2. Put him in a "Truman Show" White House
3. Wake him up
4. Tell him he won
5. Sell subscriptions
6. Retire National Debt in about 2 years

hat tip = Twitter dude, @harryallen

Today's Tweet

The best letter to the editor in today's @TB_Times. pic.twitter.com/E60kou9BXw

— Mark Puente (@MarkPuente) August 7, 2016

Today's List

 In case you needed a score card.

173 Things Donald Trump Has Said and Done That Make Him Unfit to Be President

Disclaimer: Trump contradicts himself a lot. Not all of the policy positions listed here reflect his current thinking on a given subject. You’ll have to decide for yourself whether you find that reassuring.

Update, Aug. 1, 2016: We originally listed 141 items here. But Trump doesn’t stop saying and doing unpresidential things, so we’ll continue to update the list through Election Day. New items will appear at the top of the list under “Recent Trump Moments” for a while, until they are replaced by fresher instances of self-disqualification.

Here's the list (so far) - at Slate

Fellow Travelers

I worry a little sometimes about how "the looney lefties" line up with a lot of what I'm lined up with politically - not because they're bad people and I hate making common cause with a buncha hippies, but because I'm not all in; I go out of my way not to be in lockstep with anybody; I just don't believe the "way they believe" - whatever the hell any of that means at any given moment.

Anyhoo

That said, there is something to the bit about how "you will know them by their fellows".  You are not your friends, but there are reasons people gather together and one of the big ones is that they reflect at least some of each other's values.

So when you're talking about a Donald Trump, you can't ignore the simple fact that real live White Nationalist fuckwads are lining up behind him, itching for a nice fat slice of that power pie.  We can know a little something about him by the people he attracts to his cause. 

“We have a wonderful OPPORTUNITY here folks, that may never come again, at the RIGHT time,” he stated. “Donald Trump’s campaign statements, if nothing else, have SHOWN that ‘our views’ are NOT so ‘unpopular’ as the Political Correctness crowd have told everyone they are!”

The dead give-away is when somebody's making a political statement and refers to any other American as "the enemy".  There are limits, guys.  And we've been past those limits before.  And going past those limits has always meant unjustly bad things for righteously decent people. Just sayin' - don't be like those assholes over there.

So they're all the same? It doesn't matter? You're just picking one corporatized automaton over another? Bullshit.

But in the end - seriously - who would you rather hang out with?  Which of these fellows would you rather be known by?

Today's Tweeted GIF

.@HuffPostComedy

Debate Triple Jump #TrumpOlympics pic.twitter.com/9Pb5lU5dwc

— Mr. Jameson Neat (@MrJamesonNeat) August 2, 2016