Nov 9, 2017

Today's Tweet



"...solve for middle income..."

Malarkey - the only thing they're trying to solve is the problem of getting us to say "thanks for the hat" while they shit on our heads.

 

Could Be A Lot

I'm wondering how significant it is when the opening bit at CMA is a nice big slam on 45*.

Nov 8, 2017

Today's Quote (paraphrased)


Wanting to live in a better neighborhood shouldn't mean you have move.

Nothing Fails Like Prayer - Thank God

Praise Mammon from whom all blessings flow
Praise him, all victims here below
Praise him, Congress - who love him best
Praise money and power - and fuck the rest

About Last Night



A few hi-lites



 

 

 

 

 

 


Nov 6, 2017

About That Tax Thing

Robert Reich, the experiment, and why good ol' Keynesian economics is what we need to get back to.




Nov 5, 2017

An Audience Of One

45*'s inner circle will never stop pimping the lies, and ensures 45* will never stop believing he has the support of the majority.

And of course, that's the biggest problem with all the constant propagandizing - the danger that you start believing your own bullshit.  I'm pretty sure we passed that point quite a while back with this guy.

So, he will never see this - not in this form anyway:





Officials reportedly said her speech was the most registered event of the three-day assembly, but that tight security had meant not everyone had been able to enter the hall before the doors were closed for the duration of the speeches by Abe and Trump.

However, the Guardian arrived at the hall 10 minutes before the event began and witnessed no long lines of people waiting to get in. Another attendee who entered as the doors were closing said just a handful of people were milling around outside.

Post Truth Personified

...but I'm not going to pretend the kind of bullshit coming from the White House is new in any way.  Maybe the sheer mass of the bullshit is something we haven't seen before, but we can't afford to start thinking this is normal.


NYT, Frank Bruni:

It hit me this week, around the time when Sarah Huckabee Sanders was blithely seconding Chief of Staff John Kelly’s Civil War revisionism, that I missed Sean Spicer.

I missed the panic in his eyes, which signaled a scintilla of awareness that he was peddling hooey. I missed the squeak in his voice, which suggested perhaps the tiniest smidgen of shame.

He never seemed to me entirely at home in his domicile of deception; she dwells without evident compunction in a gaudier fairyland of grander fictions. There’s no panic. No squeak. Just that repulsed expression, as if a foul odor had wafted in and she knew — just knew — that the culprit was CNN.

True, she hasn’t told a lie as tidy as Spicer’s ludicrousness about Donald Trump’s inauguration crowds. But her briefings are breathtaking — certainly this week’s were. For some 20 minutes every afternoon, down is up, paralysis is progress, enmity is harmony, stupid is smart, villain is victim, disgrace is honor, plutocracy is populism and Hillary Clinton colluded with Russia if anyone would summon the nerve to investigate her (because, you know, that never, ever happens). I watch and listen with sheer awe.

With despair, too, because Sanders doesn’t draw nearly the censure or ridicule that Spicer did, and the reason isn’t her. It’s us. More precisely, it’s what Trump and his presidency have done to us. Little more than nine months in, we’ve surrendered any expectation of honesty. We’re inured.

Nov 4, 2017

Today's Pix

 click on a pic to start the show














Bruce Bartlett

Farmers' Advance, Bruce Bartlett:

I know something about this subject. Forty years ago, while working for New York Rep. Jack Kemp, I helped originate the Republican obsession with slashing taxes that came to be called “supply-side economics.” While I believe this theory played a useful role in economic theory and policy in the late 1970s and early 1980s, it has long outlived its usefulness and is now nothing but dogma completely divorced from reality.

It will be hard for many to believe, but once upon a time, Republicans genuinely cared about the budget deficit. From Dwight Eisenhower to George H.W. Bush, many of them were actually willing to raise taxes and oppose tax cuts to reduce it. And that includes Ronald Reagan, who cut taxes in 1981 but then supported 11 tax increases to offset a ballooning deficit.

And here's the crux of it all - this is what the GOP is all about.

The 1978 passage of California 's Proposition 13, which slashed the state’s property taxes, was critical in convincing Republicans that tax-cutting was more popular than deficit reduction. But to maintain some semblance of consistency, Republican intellectuals such as Irving Kristol and Alan Greenspan developed a theory called “starve-the-beast,” which says that spending will only be cut when tax cuts increase the deficit so much that there is no alternative.

If my goal is to dismantle the "welfare state" - to kill all that FDR Socialism Stuff - then the policy agenda pursued by Repubs for the last 60 years is almost exactly how I'd do it.

The short version is that we must be punished for not having the foresight to be born into better circumstances.

Short example: There will be about 5000 American deaths this year that will result in any kind of tax liability under the Estate Tax laws.

5000 out of about 2,600,000 in an "average year".

Less than 2% will pay anything in taxes on the wealth they inherit - and they pay taxes only on the amount in excess of $10,000,000.

If my estate is $50 million, then my poor pitiful survivors will have to figure out how to squeak by on a share of about $35,000,000.

I have no sympathy for legacy pukes who complain about paying the taxes that keep them from being roasted alive by the people who do the work and pay them rent.