Oct 2, 2023

That Sound You Hear

... is Vladimir Putin, David Koch, Bob Mercer, and every fucking plutocrat and wannabe dictator laughing out loud.

So where's the reporting, Press Poodles? Matt Gaetz doesn't pull this shit on his own. Matt Gaetz is a half-assed legacy frat puke who couldn't put his own finger up his own ass if you gave him GPS and a guide book.

Are you trying to tell me Matt Gaetz is about to bring down the whole of American democracy all by his little ol' lonesome?

Matt fucking Gaetz?

Like fuck he is.



Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) introduced a resolution Monday evening to remove Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) from his seat, triggering an expected intraparty clash and setting up a showdown for the House to decide whether to depose McCarthy likely within 48 hours.

Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.
Gaetz and a handful of hard-right Republicans have repeatedly threatened to go after McCarthy’s speakership if he relied on Democratic votes to pass any spending legislation, which happened Saturday after McCarthy could not get a majority of Republicans to support various proposals to fund the government with only GOP votes. Using a motion to vacate, a single person can force the House to consider removing the speaker. McCarthy agreed to lowering the threshold for bringing the motion to win over enough support to become speaker in January.

“It is going to be difficult for my Republican friends to keep calling President Biden feeble while he continues to take Speaker McCarthy’s lunch money,” Gaetz said. "Members of the Republican Party might vote differently on a motion to vacate if they heard what the speaker had to share with us about his secret side deal with Joe Biden on Ukraine. I’ll be listening. Stay tuned.”

But it’s not clear Gaetz has 218 votes needed to remove McCarthy without himself relying on Democratic votes. If successful, the motion would not remove McCarthy from the House, but from his leadership position alone. If McCarthy is successfully removed, both Democrats and Republicans worry they will be in a speakership election fight that could drag on for days, blunting progress on passing full year appropriation bills before government funding runs out in mid-November.

The pursuit to depose McCarthy as speaker has alarmed many House Republicans, possibly setting up an internal civil war between staunch allies of McCarthy and those who have pressured him repeatedly with a variety of, at times unrealistic, demands. The effort also likely would force McCarthy and his allies to strategize with Democrats, further irritating the hard-right, because the minority party will play a determinative role in whether McCarthy can hold onto his leadership seat.

House Democrats have begun to discuss how they would handle a potential challenge to McCarthy’s speakership. House Minority Whip Rep. Katherine M. Clark (Mass.), in a note to Democrats Sunday told them to be ready for a motion to oust McCarthy as speaker “at any time, including Monday.” She did not indicate any preference in how to vote, adding that “we will have a Caucus wide discussion on how to address the motion to best meet the needs of the American people.”

The point of the exercise here (for Republicans) is to create chaos in order to demonstrate the shortcomings of democracy, which in turn shows a need for a "strong hand to stabilize the government".

"A nation of 300 million is ungovernable under the old way of doing things. We must be strong enough to forge ahead and establish a new order..."

That's a quote I made up. But it's not something we haven't heard before in one iteration or another.

What He Says He'll Do

... is almost always exactly what he doesn't do.

But this guy is mad - in both the emotional and psychiatric senses.


This is not the kind of comic relief "unhinged" that pundits love to throw around, leaving everybody a plausible way to rationalize that he's just being a little nutty - he doesn't really mean that - c'mon, that's the thing he does to keep the rubes all amped up. It's part of his act.

No. Stop it. Even if it is just that thing he does, this fucker's audience is taking it all very seriously.

Trump Fraud Trial

It would seem that Trump is coaching his lawyers to make presentations like they're on TV - like it doesn't really matter what you say as long as you look good saying it, and that what you say makes Trump look good.

Habba is very good at the PR-kinda "law, where she makes assertions in declarative terms and in a way that (I guess) is supposed to evoke a favorable response(?)

And that's right up Trump's alley. He lives in a fantasy world where he can just speak his desires into existence, and he expects his lawyers to follow his lead.

(paraphrasing)
"Just say what I tell you to say, and let my Social Media Ratfuckers do the rest."



The tenor of the trial changed during Trump’s lawyers’ opening statements.

In their respective opening statements, the attorney general’s office and lawyers for Donald J. Trump spoke past each other: While the attorney general’s lawyer focused on the specific mechanics by which properties were valued — and why — Mr. Trump’s lawyers continued to argue that, overall, there had been nothing wrong with the former president’s financial statements.

Kevin Wallace, a lawyer for the attorney general’s office, told the courtroom that employees of Mr. Trump had reverse-engineered the value of individual assets — properties like Trump Tower and 40 Wall Street — to arrive at the former president’s desired net worth. He played a clip of Michael D. Cohen, Mr. Trump’s former fixer, explaining the process, prompting the former president to cross his arms and shake his head, scowling.

But Christopher M. Kise, a lawyer for Mr. Trump, responded in his opening that there was no objective value of the assets and that differing valuations were standard in real estate.

“There was no nefarious intent, it simply reflects the change in a complex, sophisticated real estate development corporation,” he said of the way Mr. Trump’s company represented the assets’ value.

Though Mr. Trump’s lawyers began their opening arguments with a dry presentation, the tenor of the trial changed after a lawyer for Mr. Trump, Alina Habba, gave what she said was an extemporaneous presentation in which she attacked Ms. James as politically motivated and again declared that her client’s business partners had made money from the deals. Mr. Trump watched intently, occasionally nodding in agreement.

That kicked off a sequence in which Justice Arthur F. Engoron went back and forth with Ms. Habba and the other defense lawyers, Mr. Kise and Clifford S. Robert, correcting what he thought were legal errors from their presentations.

Oct 1, 2023

Today's Tweext


Practice practice practice

Today's Anti-MAGA


Texas Paul

Marge The Impaler Greene is not a nice person.

Sep 30, 2023

Big Doin's Down Georgia Way


There has to be some probability that this Scott Hall character is kind of a keystone - that if he's rolled over on Powell, then a significant section of the coup plot (that hasn't gotten a lot of play) will come to light, which could easily lead to a cascade of damning revelations about how wide and deep this fucked up mess really is.
  • Georgia
  • Michigan
  • Wisconsin
  • Pennsylvania
  • Arizona
  • Nevada
  • New Mexico
If we get lots of shit hitting lots of fans, then I have to hope that more than just the politicians and operatives get spattered. Somebody had to bankroll the thing, and there has to be any number of wealthy wannabe-plutocrats who should not be left unspattered.


Sep 29, 2023

Random Quote(s)


I'm almost done with "The Second" - which is the kind of real history that assholes like Ron DeSantis won't allow to be taught.

And guess what - not teaching kids the real history of USAmerica Inc is not a new thing.

I think I may have cause to raise a class action suit against the Jefferson County School System of the 60s and 70s. Which I thought did pretty fucking great by me - and they didn't. Not by a long shot.

None of this was taught in any of the many American History classes I took - and I had every right to expect that my teachers would let me know about it.

I will never not be pissed off about this.

"It is impossible to be unarmed when your blackness is the weapon that they fear."

It's A Wonderment


Melania wants a new contract. So how's the smart money betting on this thing?

Does she and her legal gang see something coming down the road that makes them believe she needs to get a better while she still can?

Is it the mercenary shit we've always thought it was?

Sure hope she's good and careful around staircases and windows and stuff.


Why Melania Trump may want to revisit her prenup with Donald Trump
  • Melania Trump is reportedly renegotiating the terms of her prenuptial agreement with Donald Trump, per Page Six.
  • The former first lady previously revisited the terms in 2017, according to a biography.
  • Lawyers told Insider renegotiating may be smart amid the legal troubles Donald Trump faces.
Melania Trump spent the first few months of her husband's presidency in New York renegotiating the terms of their prenuptial agreement, Mary Jordan, a Washington Post reporter wrote in her book, "The Art of Her Deal: The Untold Story of Melania Trump."

Now, as Donald Trump maintains his position as the top GOP contender for the 2024 Republican nomination, all the while besieged by a mountain of growing legal troubles, Melania Trump could be wise to revisit those terms yet again, two lawyers told Insider.

A dishy report from Page Six on Thursday said that the former first lady has already done just that, citing two anonymous sources who told the outlet Melania Trump "quietly" renegotiated the terms of a new "postnup" agreement with her husband over the last year.

Insider was unable to independently confirm the report. Representatives for Donald Trump and several acquaintances of Melania Trump did not immediately respond to Insider's requests for comment.

Renegotiating a prenup isn't solely reserved for couples experiencing marital woes, attorneys told Insider. Reevaluating the legal agreement is common among those who anticipate future financial turbulence, as well.

Trump is facing four criminal indictments and a civil action in Manhattan, in which a judge ordered that the Trump Organization's New York corporate charters be revoked.

"She may well want additional protections for herself and her son," said Bill Beslow, a high-powered New York City divorce lawyer who represented Marla Maples in her 1999 split from Trump.

Beslow could not confirm any details of the current Trump couple's prenup, but said generally, protecting your stake in the marital assets is important, he said, "if you think the whole roof may fall in on you."

Melania Trump may also want to take advantage of the leverage she has at this moment, according to Beslow, whose clients include Demi Moore, Nicole Kidman, Al Pacino, Linda Evangelista, and Mia Farrow.

"She may be saying 'this is what you need to do, if you want me on your side, if you want me on the campaign trail, if you want me in the courtroom,'" he said.

"And he may need her not to do certain things," Beslow added. "What's that worth for him, for example, for her not to write a book?"

Melania Trump has thus far removed herself from her husband's 2024 presidential campaign, forgoing public appearances alongside Donald Trump on both the trail and in court.

As Donald Trump's litany of legal troubles mount, so too do his likely legal fees, Neama Rahmani, president of West Coast Trial Lawyers, told Insider.

"There's a possibility that when it's all said and done, Trump isn't going to be in a good financial state," Rahmani told Insider.

"She may be trying to protect herself," he added.

Beslow, however, cautioned against jumping to the conclusion that a prenup-renegotiation means the Trump marriage is on the rocks.

Spouses in high-power, high-asset marriages do renegotiate their prenups for benign reasons — such as a gesture of generosity, he said.

But more nefarious motivations can also come into play. A prenup can be changed to keep marital property out of the hands of creditors.

"The spouse who is having financial difficulties, or facing financial difficulties, may want to transfer assets out of his or her name," Beslow said.

"That would be all with the view toward avoiding the seizure of those assets," he added.

Regardless of what happens come 2024, Melania Trump is wise to renegotiate the agreement now, Rahmani said.

"To the extent that you can get money from the marriage now, before his creditors get to him, that's something you should consider," he said.

Today's Reddit


Jasmine Crockett is a fire-breather.
Omg wow this
byu/Rollyman1 inNewsAroundYou

Secrets


SEASON 2 EPISODE 45: COUNTDOWN WITH KEITH OLBERMANN

9 of the secret documents Trump stole - and had stashed in the shitter at Mar-A-Lardass - are considered so super secret that they can't be kept in any SCIF outside DC.

Why isn't that prick in prison right fucking now?


TRUMP MAKES ANTISEMITIC THREAT TO "STRIKE GLOBALISTS" - 9.29.30

A-Block (1:44) SPECIAL COMMENT:
"Join the ultimate strike against the globalist class," Trump shouted at his crowd in Michigan. And of course that is a double dogwhistle because to antisemites like Trump, "Globalist" means Jews, but also has a CLEAN meaning: dealing with the interconnections of the modern world, internationally. And he got away with “strike” there because he was nominally addressing the labor action by the United Auto Workers. Of course if you think he was telling his cult of thugs to take labor action against those dealing with the interconnections of the modern world, congratulations on awakening from your nine-year coma. Trump began to covertly attack Jewish people as soon as his presidential campaign began, he threatened globalists at the United Nations, this is nothing new.

But the use of the term “ultimate strike” should set off any remaining alarm bells that have not been ringing continuously all this time. This is not a complicated calculation: if Trump determined that he could get elected by beginning a full-fledged attack on Jewish people, Jewish influence, he’d do it. When we speak of him as having the soul of a mass murderer, that’s what we mean. People do not have any actual VALUE to him. Re-enact the holocaust in whole or in part? To get re-elected? To stay out of jail? Of course he’d do that. And to any group you could name. If he became convinced that he could regain the White House by rounding up and killing all the… left-handed people, he’d do it.

There is also more to the attack on the news media for "country-threatening treason." The former editor of The Washington Post confirms are worst fears. When Trump and Kushner demanded they meet to discuss how they could 'make it up' to Trump for reporting on Russia, the executives went as summoned, and negotiated. There is the danger in how the media has treated Trump and will treat him: it's all a negotiation for him, and it's all a negotiation for them.

Speaking of which, Melania has reportedly re-done her pre-nup. Which Tee Box did she get in the new deal? And as House Republicans prepare to sack Kevin McCarthy and replace him with Tom Emmer, who best represented their hilarious 'Impeachment Inquiry' launch? Jonathan Turkey saying he didn't see any evidence worthy of an impeachment? Or Congressman Chuck Edwards, who couldn't pronounce any of the names or words in the sentence they gave him to read - particularly: "Oligarch."

B-Block (25:22) THE WORST PERSONS IN THE WORLD:
Stew Peters and guest demand execution of Taylor Swift and Travis Kielce for vaccine advocacy. Hey, Matt Gaetz? Why the long face? And Curt Schilling - Scumbag - reveals a former teammate is fighting cancer even though the former teammate wanted to keep it private. (30:42) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL, PART 1: Saturday is Stevie Day. You've heard this story before? Well here's your chance to hear it again. A boy and his first dog (ok, the boy was 53).

C-Block (46:17) THINGS I PROMISED NOT TO TELL, PART 2:
Stevie makes her cameo.