Jun 14, 2023

Ukraine


Retired 3-star Ben Hodges seems like such a straight-shooter.

"It (defending Ukraine) matters, not because we love the people, but because of where it sits on the map. If we think strategically about the Black Sea Region, we'll be a lot more clever with our interactions with our Turkish ally..." and we can better understand the importance of other countries like Georgia and Romania, etc.

For myself, I do have an emotional connection with Ukraine because I have a familial connection there. And while I don't know any indigenous Ukrainians, I definitely feel a pretty strong bond, which goes along with, and strengthens my support for the strategic aspects of this big fuckin' mess that Putin's ego has blundered us all into.



Слава Україні

🌎🌏🌍 ❤️ 🇺🇦

Jun 13, 2023

Today's Tweet


Imagine the savings to be had by locking all the crooks in a bathroom somewhere.

Better Is Better

It's still not enough, but whatever Biden's team is doing seems to be working OK so far. 

We've got the right guy in the White House, he's workin' hard, and he's got it headed in the right direction. Let's try not to fuck it up.



Inflation eased further in May but remains above normal levels

The latest inflation snapshot comes as the Federal Reserve is expected to leave rates untouched at this week’s policy meeting


Inflation eased further in May, but it’s still unclear whether the economy can slow just enough without causing pain to families and businesses already squeezed by high costs for groceries or rent.

A report out Tuesday from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed inflation eased for the 11th straight month in May. Prices rose 4 percent in comparison with last year, the smallest 12-month increase since March 2021, and an improvement from the 4.9 percent annual rate noted in April. Prices also rose 0.1 percent in May compared with the previous month.

Those figures show significant progress since the summer, when prices soared to 40-year highs and the consumer price index peaked at 9.1 percent on a year-over-year basis. But inflation is still above normal levels, and a looming question is whether large price increases will become a permanent feature of the economy — or whether more economic pain is necessary for policymakers to root out persistent inflation.

“The bigger question for inflation is: Where is it going? Where does it settle out?” said Peter Boockvar, the chief investment officer at the Bleakley Financial Group. “Are we just going to go back to this 1-to-2 percent inflation trend that we got so used to? Or is there something so structural that after the spike, after the comedown, are we going to settle at 3 [percent]?”

He added: “That plays into: How high do rates stay, and for how long?”

People are spending less on hotels, flights and restaurants

Major stock indexes flashed green Tuesday morning. Shortly after the open, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 109.7 points, or 0.32 percent. The S&P 500 index rose 0.49 percent, and the Nasdaq 0.69 percent.

Housing costs continue to be a major driver of overall inflation. Rent rose 0.5 percent in May over the month before, only a minor improvement from a 0.6 percent increase in April. Rental costs are still up 8.7 percent over last year.

Costs for used cars and trucks also increased 4.4 percent in May in comparison with April, as they did the month before. Wholesale costs for used cars have been rising, and those increases are showing up in retail prices.

A narrower measure of prices that strips out more-volatile categories including food and energy rose 0.4 percent in May, as it did in April and March. Normally, “core inflation” may rise by between 0.1 and 0.2 percent. Fed officials are especially focused on this particular measure since it helps them gauge the underlying sources of inflation that can become the most persistent.

Prices for a range of “core” goods rose yet again in May. Wendy Edelberg, director of the Hamilton Project and a former chief economist at the Congressional Budget Office, said the continued price increases show people are still spending — but that could force the Fed to slow the economy more, even if central bankers skip a rate hike this week.

“If we have any hope of getting inflation down, goods prices have to fall, just outright fall,” Edelberg said. “I expected that to happen many months ago. We had a couple of months of good news on that front, but then real consumer spending remained really strong to my surprise, and perhaps to retailers’ surprise.”

Encouraging signs were sprinkled throughout the report, too. The category for household furnishings fell 0.6 percent over the month, marking that index’s first decline since June 2021 and its largest one-month decline since August 2009. Airfares also decreased 3 percent over the month after a 2.6 percent decline in April.

To get inflation under control, the Federal Reserve has raised its benchmark interest rate at a breakneck pace since March 2022. Those moves have brought the central bank rate, the federal funds rate, to between 5 and 5.25 percent — the highest level in 16 years. The goal is for steep borrowing costs to curb demand for all kinds of lending and investments, including mortgages and auto loans, so that demand for new houses or cars can fall into better balance with supply.

In Charleston, S.C., managers at Neal Brothers aren’t expecting supply chains, prices or the overall economy to go back to the way they were. The export, packing and distribution services company instead is focused on adjusting to the “new normal” on anything from diesel to liquid propane to timber, said vice president Harry Griffin.

Griffin also worries that the Fed’s fight to rein prices in will hamper his business, too. Neal Brothers stores building materials and other goods that will eventually be used by contractors constructing new homes. If the home building industry seizes up entirely and people stop building, that could hit Griffin’s bottom line.

“As long as these interest rates stay really high, it could affect the home building industry long-term, and that may keep importers from importing as much lumber products in as they have been,” Griffin said. “It’s all connected.”

Much of the economy, though, has remained resilient throughout the Fed’s aggressive fight against inflation. Employers added 339,000 jobs in May, marking the 29th straight month of strong job growth. The country does not appear to be barreling toward a recession. And while there are signs that Americans are spending less on restaurants, hotels and airlines, that could help the Fed’s attempts to curb prices in service industries, which have been especially susceptible to labor shortages.

President Biden touted the report, pointing to steps his administration has taken to tackle the cost of gas, prescription drugs and health insurance premiums.

“At the same time, the unemployment rate has remained below 4 percent for the longest stretch in more than 50 years, helping to support wage gains over the last year, even after accounting for inflation,” Biden said in a statement. “More Americans are in the workforce than in decades.”

For much of the past 15 months, the Fed has rushed to catch up to inflation, often hiking the federal funds rate in big jumps. And it has always signaled that more work remains to be done. But when central bankers gather for their June policy meeting Tuesday and Wednesday, their agenda will be somewhat different.

The widely held expectation is that policymakers will leave rates unchanged this week to give themselves some time to see how the past year’s increases are filtering through the economy. Rate increases operate with a lag, and many economists argue that the drop in inflation over the past year has been driven largely by improvements in supply chains, gas prices returning to normal and the economic aftershocks of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine gradually fading away. That could mean the full toll of higher rates has yet to be felt.

Still, there are many sources of inflation that haven’t been tamed by the Fed’s moves. The housing market slowed as mortgage rates soared. But rent, which makes up a large share of the consumer price index, continues to be a major driver of overall inflation. Rent isn’t expected to simmer down until the volume of housing available significantly increases or until cooling in the rest of the housing market trickles down to leases. No one knows when that will happen.

Officials have not definitively said they have entirely finished raising rates, and incoming data on inflation, jobs and consumer spending will help them decide whether to make further increases in the coming months. Also significant will be information on banking lending, which has moderated since a recent shock to the financial system made lenders more skittish about issuing credit.

“A decision to hold our policy rate constant at a coming meeting should not be interpreted to mean that we have reached the peak rate for this cycle,” Fed governor Philip Jefferson said in a recent speech. “Indeed, skipping a rate hike at a coming meeting would allow the committee to see more data before making decisions about the extent of additional policy firming.” (Jefferson’s remarks carry added weight since he was nominated to the Fed’s No. 2 role last month.)

In Baltimore, Postman Plus Perry Hall is getting hits from all sides. The pack-and-ship store has seen costs of 250-foot rolls of bubble wrap nearly double. Transportation and shipping costs go up every few months, even since gas prices simmered down from the summer’s peaks. All of the store’s employees start at $15 already, but the hot labor market means they could earn higher pay elsewhere.

Owner Sharon Greenbeck has tried to absorb as much of the cost as possible. But looking at her small business, Greenbeck said it’s nearing time for her to pass higher prices on to her customers. She worries about how they will react. Already, customers raise an eyebrow if they want to send gifts to friends and the shipping ends up costing as much as the gifts. Greenbeck said she has even seen inflation encroach on the “little things.” For instance, the rubber ducks she would have in stock for children have doubled in price.

“I sell less because people say, ‘Oh, I’m not spending $2 on a duck,’” Greenbeck said. “So then my merchandise sits. It’s an ugly cycle.”


Today's Today


Donald Trump will be arraigned on a boatload of federal felony charges today, and I have to go out on a limb right here and say I don't expect the kind of MAGA shittiness that lots of people (ie: Press Poodles) have been angsting about.

With almost a thousand arrests, trials, &/or convictions stemming from that mess on Jan6, I have to believe the chill is on. For some, doing time in a federal lock-up reinforces their belief that they're being victimized by 'da gubmint', but for most, it tends to focus your mind on how stupidly you've behaved as you begin to realize that Trump is the one who made you a victim in order to serve his own venal ambitions.

That's not to say some of those idiots aren't planning some more shit - there's always enough assholes around who get themselves, and each other, whipped into a rich creamy lather and decide they need to go fuck something up. I'm just saying government has responded the way I expect government to respond, in getting organized and doing what they can to meet the threat.

BTW, there have been times I've hated the feds for getting organized and moving against people like me when I thought I was doing things what normal citizens are supposed to do.

But this is not the same. There is no equivalence on this.

I was politicking against Bush43 and his fucked up war in Iraq; I was doing nothing like plotting violent action; and while there were some shitty things being done to peaceful protesters, most of our worst paranoia was unfounded. (most)

Now we've got non-peaceful protesters, who are plotting violence, and a government taking mostly appropriate action. (mostly appropriate - never ever put your full trust in people who wield governmental power)

So anyway, Trump will be arraigned today and it'll be a big Circus Of The Stoopid, and some of the more rabid of the MAGA rubes will tumble and stumble and rock the jungle - and nothing will happen except that a crooked ex-POTUS will continue his long slow fall that's been coming since the King Of The Tiny Dick Flimflammers was born.

Today's Pix

Some of these are a bit dated - I've been remiss in my blogging duties.

click
⬇️

























Jun 12, 2023

SCOTUS


Anybody thinking John G Roberts would actually stick to "calling balls-n-strikes" - as he told us in his confirmation hearings - should've left that one go with the Shelby decision.

He completely blew the call on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; he got booed for it something awful, and tried to explain it with one the most tone-deaf eye-gouging opinions ever, and now he's tacked over in a whole different direction because (IMHO) he and his handlers can see the fact that the plutocracy agenda he's helping to promulgate is way more out of whack than they figured.

I'll take the "win", but holy fuck, Batman - are you really trying to tell me there's nothing of value in 

Another smart guy doing stoopid things, still believing the Daddy State always knows best, but realizing that sometimes the shit work needs to be done where nobody can see it quite so well.

Jennifer Rubin nails it.


Roberts isn’t an institutionalist. He’s a weather vane.

The Supreme Court’s ruling in Allen v. Milligan, holding that Alabama’s redistricting map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, shocked the legal world. This was the same court that eviscerated Section 2 in Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, creating a “guideline” that would make most states’ plans impervious to challenge. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., who held in the 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder that “things have changed dramatically” in the decades since the Voting Rights Act, wrote the majority opinion.

My how things have changed.

In striking down the preclearance process in Shelby, Roberts insisted that “no one can fairly say that it shows anything approaching the ‘pervasive,’ ‘flagrant,’ ‘widespread,’ and ‘rampant’ discrimination that faced Congress in 1965, and that clearly distinguished the covered jurisdictions from the rest of the Nation at that time.” Now, he staunchly defended a district-court ruling striking down districts gerrymandered to the detriment of Blacks and sang the praises of Section 2.

Roberts warned the risk of inequality “is greatest ‘where minority and majority voters consistently prefer different candidates’ and where minority voters are submerged in a majority voting population that ‘regularly defeat[s]’ their choices. … A district is not equally open, in other words, when minority voters face — unlike their majority peers — bloc voting along racial lines, arising against the backdrop of substantial racial discrimination within the State, that renders a minority vote unequal to a vote by a nonminority voter.”

The turnaround is even more dramatic when one considers that Roberts’s conservative colleagues, including Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, stayed the district court’s ruling, a move that allowed Alabama (and other states) to proceed with discriminatory maps that could well have tilted the House to Republicans in 2022.

Roberts’s defenders might argue that he reads each case on its merits. But others have postulated that Roberts and the other conservative justices are setting us up for decisions in Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, cases in which, civil rights groups fear, the court will invalidate race-conscious affirmative action programs. Still others surmise that Roberts has heard the rising anger at the court on everything from Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization to Justice Clarence Thomas’s financial reporting scandal; the “institutionalist” Roberts, they posit, wants to soothe the public by showing he’s not a partisan hack, enlisting Kavanaugh, who concurred, to calm the waters.

If it is the latter, then this would hardly be the first time Roberts turned on a dime, not as a matter of jurisprudential analysis but apparently for political reasons — to assuage the public, which he knew would erupt if the court issued a radical decision out of step with public opinion. Recall his switch in position on the Affordable Care Act.

As detailed in “The Chief: The Life and Turbulent Times of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.” by Joan Biskupic and in other reporting, Roberts was initially part of a 5-4 majority in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius to strike down the law. But Roberts got cold feet. After assigning the majority to himself, he groped around for a way to preserve the law and avoid public outrage that would likely have erupted had the court struck down then-President Barack Obama’s greatest legislative achievement and the first national health-care plan for healthy, working-age adults. The resulting opinion, widely criticized as logically attenuated and downright weird, preserved the statute based on Congress’s taxing power. This was not jurisprudence but politics, as Roberts put his finger to the wind.

In Dobbs, Roberts struggled to avoid the political backlash he saw coming. In oral argument and in his concurrence, Roberts struggled to come up with a political compromise. Could the court protect abortions before 16 weeks? The legal grounds for such a compromise were shaky at best. His desperate effort to save the court from itself amounted to a failed attempt to bargain colleagues down from a risky, radical position. He was unsuccessful, but he surely saw the result: a political backlash of such force that it swamped the expected midterm red wave and drove the court’s approval to historic lows.

If political opinion “tester” explains Roberts’s past compromises and the shift from Shelby to Milligan, he should be viewed not so much as an institutionalist (who would protect the jurisprudential integrity of the court and insist on abiding by the highest ethical standards) but as an unprincipled politician, trying to prevent his radical colleagues from sinking the court and the Republican Party when he suspects blowback to decisions from the court’s right-wing majority.

In that sense, Roberts has become the worst sort of results-oriented judge. Rather than legal consistency, respect for precedent or even a judicial philosophy, he’s become the quintessential weather vane. How much can the public tolerate? How far must he let his conservative colleagues drift before the court falls into political oblivion?

Roberts’s transformation from the umpire calling balls and strikes to the stadium manager (how do we excite the fans but keep them from rioting?) underscores the need for a complete restructuring of the court. If the court’s decisions are now the result of radical ideology tempered only by Roberts’s political barometer, then it cannot be considered a court at all. It’s a purely political body. A political response — expanding the court — would be in order. At the very least, the justices should serve limited terms.

Though Section 2 has gotten a reprieve from the court, Roberts has given the game away. The court has not solved its credibility problem. To the contrary, it has made it worse.

Jun 11, 2023

Listen To The Indictment


Ali Velshi reads the Trump indictment. Very interesting, and easy to understand.

Today's Meme



Quick reminder:
If your position is that kids should be beaten because you were beaten and you turned out OK, then I've got news for ya, bubba - you did not turn out OK.


As The Worm Turns

And it begins to come into full flower. The need for building lifeboats is seeping into the MAGA hive brain.

The 'elite' that the rubes have been taught to loathe are busily deflecting in order to take the thing in a slightly different direction. They're now telling the unwashed Republican masses that they've been betrayed, which is pretty easy to do because they've been conditioned to see themselves as victims all along - it's one of the main tools authoritarians use to manipulate people.

Jun 10, 2023

Got It All In

The big move home to Colorado proceeds apace.

My youngest helped me pack all my shit in Charlottesville - helped me drive out here too - and his big brother helped me move it all from the PODS thingie into what seems like a very tiny apartment. (it's not all that bad, but I'm still going to call it Hovel III - it's got some issues)

Anyway, it's all inside, and now I'm attempting to disprove one of the basic tenets of physical science, ie: You can't reduce volume by rearranging mass.


I got the internet and the TV up and runnin' tho' - I'll call that a partial win.

So now that I've been thru a dozen or so items on a punch list that shouldn't be my fuckin' job, all I have to do is to figure out if I can do something about the Smoker Stench in a 50-year-old apartment that seems not to have had its duct work cleaned for at least half that time.

Yeehaw and away we go.