Jan 7, 2016
Jan 6, 2016
Today's Tweet
BREAKING: Republicans Pass Repeal That Strips Healthcare From Millions GOP Voters https://t.co/dWfqgGzk2U #Obamacare pic.twitter.com/lFBS4zZIBO
— The Baxter Bean (@TheBaxterBean) January 6, 2016
Today's Snark
Give a Republican a fish, and he'll tell you a story about his long hard struggle to become a great fisherman.
Offer to teach a Republican to fish, and he'll denounce you as a socialist.
hat tip = The Daily Shit or maybe it was LOLGOP - I get confused sometimes.
Today's DumFux News
Trying hard not to dismiss this as just a buncha cold spirit-sucking empty-hearted teeny-bop cunts at the mean girls table.
Politics-as-usual?
Or maybe massive unresolved daddy issues? That could easily be the case with Meghan McCain I guess.
When you slag a guy for tearing up a little while he's trying to get us to do something about too many dead kids - when you feel the need to stonewall against any effort to keep kids from being killed - you have no soul and no honor.
And it's not just because you have no soul and no honor. As it turns out, it's also because the boss can't afford anything to be done about the problem. And that's what I think is driving such cunt-ish behavior on air.
If you wanna know what's up with any problem here in USAmerica Inc, you have to look at who's currently benefiting from the problem, and/or who stands to profit from any proposed solution for that problem.
And more importantly, since we're talkin' politics now, you have to understand that solutions for these problems are not actually allowed - REPEATING: solutions are not allowed. There's too much money and too many careers of too many very powerful people at stake.
It doesn't matter what we're scrappin' about - it can be Abortion or Guns or Taxes or Poverty or Schools or Prisons or any other 'problem'. As long as we're fighting, we're fueling the revenue streams that keep the fat cats fat.
The people who're making the decisions on what we see and hear over the air or on cable; what we read online; what emails we receive asking for another 3 bucks to help in the fight for blah blah blah - these are either currently wealthy powerful people, or they're people looking to become wealthy and powerful by monetizing the fight for whatever.
Mike's First Law of Career Self-Nurturing: Anybody with any prospect of enjoying even a relatively low degree of success will never ever EVER try to work himself out of that job.
We have a News Industry that went from Public Service to Cost Center to Profit Center to Money Mill - there is no content available on Fox or MSNBC or WashPo or your local FARMNet station that isn't programmed to push somebody's buttons and move them to send a generous donation to their newfound favorite cause.
Seems like the only thing we manufacture in this country anymore is this bullshit high-school-fuck-around drama. But hey - business is booming, so it's all good.
My POTUS
Because there's no contradiction in having a hard head and a soft heart.
I'm not a fan - Obama's done some things I strongly oppose, and he's left some things undone I wish he'd tried a lot harder to get done. But that's just how this shit works. And the guy's still pretty fuckin' amazing.
Jan 5, 2016
The Farce Awakens
"... we're not about fear; we're not about force; we're not about intimidation ..."
That's why your action is considered an "armed occupation of federal property"? And you brought all the guns because you have no intention of threatening violence or making a show of force?
OK.
BTW - Messianic much, Mr Bundy?
Here's the thing, schmuck - maybe you and the Goober Squad could just go the fuck home and let the good folks in Harney County decide what's best for the good folks in Harney County. Could we try that?
An Acculturated Callousness
In WWI, civilian casualties accounted for about 10% of the total. By the time we got around to invading Iraq almost 100 years later, that number had climbed to 90%.
It's pretty simple really. First, it's a transaction - there's lotsa people, so we can spend them - the cost of war.
Second, in spite of our efforts to impose "Rules Of War", WWII made it very clear that nothing much had actually changed at all.
Counter Force = kill their soldiers; destroy their weapons and equipment
Counter Value = destroy roads and bridges and factories and farms
Counter Collateral = kill their people - the ones who become the soldiers, build the roads and grow the food.
Whoever loses the least gets to call themselves the winners, and put the other guys on trial for "war crimes".
All of that gets real clear about 42 minutes into this film:
It's pretty simple really. First, it's a transaction - there's lotsa people, so we can spend them - the cost of war.
Second, in spite of our efforts to impose "Rules Of War", WWII made it very clear that nothing much had actually changed at all.
Counter Force = kill their soldiers; destroy their weapons and equipment
Counter Value = destroy roads and bridges and factories and farms
Counter Collateral = kill their people - the ones who become the soldiers, build the roads and grow the food.
Whoever loses the least gets to call themselves the winners, and put the other guys on trial for "war crimes".
All of that gets real clear about 42 minutes into this film:
Forgive The Oxymoron
EJ Dionne points out "conservative thinking":
"Forgive me for noting that conservatives seem to believe that the rich will work harder if we give them more, and the poor will work harder if we give them less."Here's your visual on that one:
Jan 4, 2016
Give The Lady A Hand
I'm not looking forward to having to vote for Hillary. I'm down with Bernie and I'll stay with him for as long as I can, but if / when the time comes, I'm not gonna behave like some crackpot wingnut. We get plenty of that nonsense from the GOP. This is not the movies; we don't always get everything we want; sometimes we have to go with the least bad option; etc etc etc
And please don't give me the crap about "having to choose between the lesser of two evils". When faced with that choice, isn't it really kind of an imperative to make every effort to support the lesser of the two evils in an attempt to keep the greater of those two evils out of power?
Or are you just too fucking stoopid to grasp the basic concept of Greater vs Lesser?
I very much want Bernie to win it all.
But what I think is actually more important than that is to make sure the Repubs don't win much of anything.
So anyway, Hillary did a townhall thing - always a risk - and of course she got a troll in the audience who stood and heckled her for something, and she nailed the reply:
And please don't give me the crap about "having to choose between the lesser of two evils". When faced with that choice, isn't it really kind of an imperative to make every effort to support the lesser of the two evils in an attempt to keep the greater of those two evils out of power?
Or are you just too fucking stoopid to grasp the basic concept of Greater vs Lesser?
I very much want Bernie to win it all.
But what I think is actually more important than that is to make sure the Repubs don't win much of anything.
So anyway, Hillary did a townhall thing - always a risk - and of course she got a troll in the audience who stood and heckled her for something, and she nailed the reply:
“You are very rude and I’m not never ever going to call on you. Thank you.”And in response to the inevitable "what about Bill" question:
"He's not running for President, I am. And as his wife I've moved on; shouldn't you?"She'll hit back; she's starting to get that part of her playbook in place. And she deserves props for that.
This Is Just Too Good
From HuffPo:
The gunmen who have seized a federal building in Oregon claim they're patriots.
But on social media, many are calling the self-styled "militia" terrorists -- and mocking the group that has taken over the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters with derisive nicknames.
Whomever came up with #YallQaeda to describe the Oregon militia, I take my hat off to you. And then put it back on and take it off again.
— Colin Miner (@cominer) January 3, 2016
The emergence of #VanillaISIS in Oregon sparks fears of radicalizing disaffected hipsters in Portland.
— Khaled Bey (@KhaledBeydoun) January 4, 2016
You know you're a badass Tea Party patriot when your militia takes over an unprotected bird sanctuary
— Stonekettle (@Stonekettle) January 3, 2016
Still others have taken to using terms such as #YokelHaram and #al-Shabubba, and say the group is waging #YeeHawd.Get all the latest on Y'allQaeda and Vanilla ISIS at Mock Paper Scissors
Jan 3, 2016
Today's Tweet
Breaking : A member of #YallQaeda leaks his photo out to the public #OregonUnderAttack pic.twitter.com/SwKJLCx596
— Packers (10-5) (@whovian15) January 4, 2016
BTW - "YallQaeda" is courtesy of Mock Paper Scissors
The Bundy Redux
Civil Disobedience being in the eye of the beholder, I'm not at all sure what it is specifically, but there's a fair degree of certainty that what's going on in Oregon ain't it.
militarized law enforcement responses almost always bad idea, but we only raise this point when it's about criminal right wingers
— Atrios (@Atrios) January 3, 2016
Trying hard not to say, "It's time to regulate the fuck outa that militia."
https://t.co/n018rc9ENf
— Mike Roberts (@EvilleMike) January 3, 2016
There's so much happening, and so many flips and turns, and so much that's gone before that leads up to this, it's hard to find the room to step back far enough to get the whole picture.
One of the big things is that outfits like The Bundy Gang have been playing this "I'm not gonna be da gubmint's bitch" game for a very long time. Well sorry-not-sorry, guys, but you're not the government's bitch. You're Sheldon Adelson's bitch. You're Charlie Koch's bitch. You're Roger Ailes's bitch. You've been lied to and manipulated into being pissed off at all the wrong people. Which makes you a very useful bitch for anybody with a sizable media budget, who plays on your need for martyrdom and pity in order to hide his own power-grabbing agenda. In the old story, you're Guy of Gisborne to Rush Limbaugh's Prince John. Not to put too fine a point on it for ya, Sparky, but you're on the wrong fucking side. Again.
So anyway -
Nobody ever taught these moochers about The Tragedy Of The Commons. They see "open land" that belongs to all Americans; they need to expand their operation to make it pay for an expanding clan of (eg) Bundy kids; and so they believe in their hearts that they can just take what they need because all that land is right there and they feel entitled to it.
And none of that ever registers as ironic in their pea-pickin' little brain pans. And if you try to teach them a little sumpthin' about how they have to share - or at least they have to pay for what they get - they go into that cornered-animal crouch and start whining about being the victims of Oppressive Gubmint again.
These guys seem never to have matured past being hormone-poisoned teenagers. They're subsumed by that deadly combination of ignorance and adolescent bravado which makes it impossible for them to know their conclusion can't be true when they start from a false premise.
--BTW: that last bit is Ayn Rand. You remember Ayn Rand - the patron saint of your Radically Libertarian Douchenozzlery, right, Sparky? Yeah, no - it never sounds like you remember shit about it even if you ever fucking read any of it.
Don't worry
Even as we speak the media is sending their best thesauruses to Oregon to find other words than "terrorists."
#OregonUnderAttack
— Steve Marmel (@Marmel) January 3, 2016
I remember watching some Western on TV and the typical barroom brawl breaks out, and I asked my dad why everybody gets in on the fight when it was just a beef between two guys. He told me something like - some jokers got nuthin' better to do than hang around waitin' for an excuse to punch somebody.
So now we wait.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)