Jun 8, 2017

A New One


I've not met this lady, but we've been chatting online for a short bit and I think she's the real thing.  And she talks about real things too.

I've linked to her site on my "Places I Go" list - click on the little stack of lines in the upper left of the main page. 

Intrigue At The Palace


On Friday, January 6, FBI Director James Comey met with President-elect Donald Trump. His task was awkward; he needed to inform Trump that the FBI’s counterterrorism unit was investigating claims that Russia had embarrassing blackmail material on the billionaire real estate developer.

Something in Trump’s reaction disturbed Comey. “I felt compelled to document my first conversation with the President-Elect in a memo,” he recalls in testimony prepared for the Senate Intelligence Committee. The compulsion to record the conversation was fierce and immediate; Comey didn’t even wait to get back to his hotel. “I began to type it on a laptop in an FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower the moment I walked out of the meeting.” From then on, Comey began documenting all his meetings with Trump. “This had not been my practice in the past,” he says.

On January 27, Comey again found himself in a strange situation with the president, caught by surprise when a dinner invitation that originally included his family turned into Comey having dinner with Trump, alone, in the White House’s Green Room. Trump immediately asked if Comey wanted to remain in his job, and said many other people would want it — a request Comey found strange, as Trump had already asked him to stay on as FBI director, and Comey had already accepted.

“My instincts told me that the one-on-one setting, and the pretense that this was our first discussion about my position, meant the dinner was, at least in part, an effort to have me ask for my job and create some sort of patronage relationship,” Comey says. Trump would soon make that perfectly clear. “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty,” the president told his FBI director.

In subsequent meetings, Trump would ask Comey to “lift the cloud” Russia was casting over his presidency, to announce publicly that Trump was not being investigated, and to squelch the investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn’s activities. In their final conversation, Trump asked for Comey’s cooperation, saying, “I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know.” Comey says he did not know what “that thing” was. Shortly thereafter, Comey was fired.

Everybody's expecting a big show today when Comey testifies, but the smart money seems to be on Big-Nothing-Burger.  Why does the guy telegraph his moves by releasing a kind of script before he shows up?  He doesn't think anybody's going to confine themselves just to the points he outlined, does he?  But then again, it's not likely for him to drop the big one in open session. But then again again, this guy has pulled some pretty horrendous shit in the not too distant past.  

And wouldn't it be nice if one of the Press Poodles could manage to ask the question - Is any of this to be considered "usual and customary"?

So anyway, we see what we see today. And what we do know to be "usual and customary" is that we can count on the Poodles to sell us gigundous piles of car insurance and boner pills. This is USAmerica Inc - it's what we do.


Manage the expectations, and keep pushing Congress to do something honorable.

Jun 7, 2017

It's A Ladder, Einstein

Today's Quote

"Ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have."
--James Baldwin

Today's Tweet


Jun 6, 2017

The Unraveling


Wanna know what's really weird?  In working so hard to consolidate power and to achieve that ever-elusive Unitary Executive, 45* is actually in the process of stripping The Executive Branch of all the power gains it's made in the last 35 years.


A top Justice Department official under President George W. Bush, Jack Goldsmith, unleashed a 17-entry Tweetstorm arguing that Trump’s ongoing attacks on his own lawyers and his apparent effort to disclaim responsibility for reissuing his “watered down” order are further eroding judicial deference for the executive branch.

“Given POTUS’s instability, it is not just courts that have reason to relax the presumption of regularity for this Prez,” wrote Goldsmith, now a professor at Harvard Law School. “We all have reason to do so about everything the Executive branch does that touches, however lightly, the President....One thing DT behavior entails...is many losses in court and not just on the immigration EOs....Everything else Executive would normally win—reversing Clean Power Plan, terminating treaty, new regs, etc.—will be much, much harder.”

Leaves me to wonder - when the GOP begins the inevitable Trump Rehab Project (and you bloody well know they will), just how trippy-flippy will it get trying to rationalize giving Trump credit for "Rebalancing The System Of Checks And Balances In Order To Save The Republic"?

Yeah, well - ya heard it here first.

Ain't No Drip Drip Drip


NYT:

An intelligence contractor was charged with sending a classified report about Russia’s interference in the 2016 election to the news media, the Justice Department announced Monday, the first criminal leak case under President Trump.

The case showed the department’s willingness to crack down on leaks, as Mr. Trump has called for in complaining that they are undermining his administration. His grievances have contributed to a sometimes tense relationship with the intelligence agencies he now oversees.

The Justice Department announced the case against the contractor, Reality Leigh Winner, 25, about an hour after the national-security news outlet The Intercept published the apparent document, a May 5 intelligence reportfrom the National Security Agency.

The report described two cyberattacks by Russia’s military intelligence unit, the G.R.U. — one in August against a company that sells voter registration-related software and another, a few days before the election, against 122 local election officials.


These leaks lately are not bad things. And (like the most recent one from NSA) they're coming from patriots not criminals.

Of course, I don't know anything about Ms Winner, but I think I can draw a line between her and (eg) Ed Snowden, and make a pretty good case to the effect that Ms Winner did it trying to help us, while Snowden and Assange did it trying to help Vlad Putin, and to line their own pockets.

People like Ms Winner are putting themselves at great personal risk to get info out to us that we need to see.

They can't push that info up thru channels because they know the White House gang will do anything to keep us from knowing what kinda shit they (and their Russian buddies) were up to during the election process last year. 

And since there's practically no one in Congress who isn't scrambling to cash in on Trump's trouble in one way or another (or just to cover his own ass), about the only way they can get the truth out to us is to break the law.

This looks to be in the finest American traditions of civil disobedience. These people are fucking heroes.

Wanna know how I'm more or less sure of what I just said?  I feel pretty confident believing the leakers are heroes because 45* and his gang are adamant about calling them traitors.

Daddy State Basics:
  1. Every Accusation is a Confession.
  2. Every boast is an Admission of Inadequacy and/or an attempt to take credit for someone else's work.
  3. Every warning of some tragic event that's coming our way is a Statement of Intent - either they're currently, actively, and directly causing the tragedy, or they're planning to cause it in order to punish us if we don't go along with whatever shitty policy they're proposing.
  4. Every day is upside-down-n-backwards day in the Daddy State.

Keith

Vox Explains

Jun 5, 2017

Lying Liars


WaPo calls 'em out (from 5-24-17)

The Congressional Budget Office will release its score of the GOP health-care bill today, and whatever the details, it will confirm once again that the Republican plan would cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicaid, leaving many millions uncovered. This, plus continued discussion of President Trump’s budget — which would heap a whole array of other cuts on top of that — will demonstrate that Trump is fully committed to a truly transformative downsizing of social programs that help lower-income people, packaged with an enormous tax cut for the rich.

But the evidence is mounting that Trump’s economic blueprint — whatever considerable harm it would do to people who didn’t vote for Trump — is also likely to hurt untold numbers of people who did vote for him.

Trump’s budget would transform the structure of Medicaid and cut spending on the program by hundreds of billions of dollars on top ofthe GOP health-care plan’s hundreds of billions in cuts to the Medicaid expansion over 10 years. This would chop down the program by nearly half. It’s hard to know how many Trump voters would be hit by these cuts, but judging by Kaiser’s polling, we’re talking about a lot of them.


--and--

The White House has an explanation for Trump’s reversal on Medicaid. Asked by John Harwood to explain the flip, budget director Mick Mulvaney claimed the promise was supplanted by Trump’s promise to repeal and replace Obamacare. This is nonsense: As Brian Beutler explains, Mulvaney “layered a lie of his own on top of Trump’s,” because Trump’s budget cuts to Medicaid “go hundreds of billions of dollars beyond phasing out Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.”

I’d go further still:
There are numerous Trump lies being forced out into the open right now. Trump claimed he would not touch Medicaid and simultaneously that he’d repeal Obamacare and replace it with something better for all. It was a lie for Trump to claim he wouldn’t touch Medicaid; it was a lie to suggest preserving Medicaid and repealing Obamacare were compatible; it was a lie to claim that his repeal-and-replace plan would result in better coverage for everybody. If anything, the White House’s justifications only throw the scale and audacity of these intertwined scams, lies and betrayals into even sharper relief.